<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<blog-post>
  <author-id type="integer">3554</author-id>
  <blog-comments-count type="integer">1</blog-comments-count>
  <blog-post-status-id type="integer">3</blog-post-status-id>
  <body-format>econsultancy_xml</body-format>
  <body-formatted>
  &lt;p&gt;The tale begins in October 2005, when Peter Calveley from New Zealand &lt;a href="http://igdmlgd.blogspot.com/2005_10_01_igdmlgd_archive.html"&gt;ordered a book from Amazon, which never turned up&lt;/a&gt; (it was actually ordered from Amazon's Marketplace, not even Amazon itself - but that's another issue!).&lt;/p&gt;
  &lt;p&gt;
    &lt;a href="http://igdmlgd.blogspot.com/2005_11_01_igdmlgd_archive.html"&gt;One month later&lt;/a&gt;, Peter decided to let loose the wrath of &lt;a href="http://www.waitangi.com/warfare/utu.html"&gt;Utu&lt;/a&gt; upon the mightly Amazon - Utu is a traditional Maoiri 'obligation to undertake payment upon others for a wrongdoing'. And his chosen form of payment was to inform the US Patent Office that Amazon's famous patent for 1-click payment was in fact covering essentially the same idea as a patent filed 18 months earlier.&lt;/p&gt;
  &lt;p&gt;As if to test Peter's resolve, the US Patent Office replied with a request for $2,520 - the cost of a full patent re-examination.&#160;Undeterred,&#160;he posted a&#160;request for donations, added a&#160;Paypal button&#160;to his blog site&#160;and two months later the fee was in the post.&lt;/p&gt;
  &lt;p&gt;Fast forward to May 2006 and the &lt;a href="http://igdmlgd.blogspot.com/2006_05_01_igdmlgd_archive.html"&gt;request for re-examination is granted by the Patent Office&lt;/a&gt;. According to &lt;a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Patent_infringement"&gt;Wikipedia&lt;/a&gt;&#160;a typical patent infringement case in the US costs $1-3M in legal fees - not sure if this&#160;counts as an 'infringement'&#160;case but one thing for sure, it's going to cost them a lot more than a replacement book and an apologetic phone call.&lt;/p&gt;
</body-formatted>
  <body-unformatted>&lt;FormattedContent xmlns="http://www.e-consultancy.com/schema/formattedContent/"&gt;
  &lt;Paragraph&gt;The tale begins in October 2005, when Peter Calveley from New Zealand &lt;Link URL="http://igdmlgd.blogspot.com/2005_10_01_igdmlgd_archive.html" Window="New"&gt;ordered a book from Amazon, which never turned up&lt;/Link&gt; (it was actually ordered from Amazon's Marketplace, not even Amazon itself - but that's another issue!).&lt;/Paragraph&gt;
  &lt;Paragraph&gt;
    &lt;Link URL="http://igdmlgd.blogspot.com/2005_11_01_igdmlgd_archive.html" Window="New"&gt;One month later&lt;/Link&gt;, Peter decided to let loose the wrath of &lt;Link URL="http://www.waitangi.com/warfare/utu.html" Window="New"&gt;Utu&lt;/Link&gt; upon the mightly Amazon - Utu is a traditional Maoiri 'obligation to undertake payment upon others for a wrongdoing'. And his chosen form of payment was to inform the US Patent Office that Amazon's famous patent for 1-click payment was in fact covering essentially the same idea as a patent filed 18 months earlier.&lt;/Paragraph&gt;
  &lt;Paragraph&gt;As if to test Peter's resolve, the US Patent Office replied with a request for $2,520 - the cost of a full patent re-examination.&#160;Undeterred,&#160;he posted a&#160;request for donations, added a&#160;Paypal button&#160;to his blog site&#160;and two months later the fee was in the post.&lt;/Paragraph&gt;
  &lt;Paragraph&gt;Fast forward to May 2006 and the &lt;Link URL="http://igdmlgd.blogspot.com/2006_05_01_igdmlgd_archive.html" Window="New"&gt;request for re-examination is granted by the Patent Office&lt;/Link&gt;. According to &lt;Link URL="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Patent_infringement" Window="New"&gt;Wikipedia&lt;/Link&gt;&#160;a typical patent infringement case in the US costs $1-3M in legal fees - not sure if this&#160;counts as an 'infringement'&#160;case but one thing for sure, it's going to cost them a lot more than a replacement book and an apologetic phone call.&lt;/Paragraph&gt;
&lt;/FormattedContent&gt;</body-unformatted>
  <created-at type="datetime">2006-06-06T14:22:00+01:00</created-at>
  <enabled-blog-comments-count type="integer">0</enabled-blog-comments-count>
  <expertise-level-id type="integer">1</expertise-level-id>
  <extract-format>econsultancy_xml</extract-format>
  <extract-formatted>
  &lt;p&gt;One lost book, one disgruntled customer and a potential million dollar legal fee for Amazon - it's the latest in a series of morality tales showing&#160;how e-commerce companies can be hit where it hurts most due to bad customer experience.&lt;/p&gt;
</extract-formatted>
  <extract-unformatted>&lt;FormattedContent xmlns="http://www.e-consultancy.com/schema/formattedContent/"&gt;
  &lt;Paragraph&gt;One lost book, one disgruntled customer and a potential million dollar legal fee for Amazon - it's the latest in a series of morality tales showing&#160;how e-commerce companies can be hit where it hurts most due to bad customer experience.&lt;/Paragraph&gt;
&lt;/FormattedContent&gt;</extract-unformatted>
  <featured type="boolean">false</featured>
  <id type="integer">7</id>
  <learn-more-formatted>&lt;p&gt;Refer also to Econsultancy's &lt;strong&gt;&lt;a href="http://econsultancy.com/reports/user-experience-buyers-guide"&gt;User Experience Buyer's Guide&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/strong&gt; and &lt;strong&gt;&lt;a href="http://econsultancy.com/reports/effective-web-design-best-practice-guide"&gt;Effective Web Design Guide&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/strong&gt; for more information about best practice in these areas.&lt;/p&gt;</learn-more-formatted>
  <learn-more-unformatted>&lt;p&gt;Refer also to Econsultancy's &lt;strong&gt;&lt;a href="http://econsultancy.com/reports/user-experience-buyers-guide"&gt;User Experience Buyer's Guide&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/strong&gt; and &lt;strong&gt;&lt;a href="http://econsultancy.com/reports/effective-web-design-best-practice-guide"&gt;Effective Web Design Guide&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/strong&gt; for more information about best practice in these areas.&lt;/p&gt;</learn-more-unformatted>
  <legacy-article-id type="integer">361209</legacy-article-id>
  <name>Counting the cost of bad customer experience</name>
  <private type="boolean">false</private>
  <published-at type="datetime">2006-06-09T10:14:00+01:00</published-at>
  <slug>counting-the-cost-of-bad-customer-experience</slug>
  <tweetbacks-updated-at type="datetime">2009-04-28T22:29:26+01:00</tweetbacks-updated-at>
  <unpublished-at type="datetime" nil="true"></unpublished-at>
  <updated-at type="datetime">2009-10-13T08:28:56+01:00</updated-at>
  <views-count type="integer">584</views-count>
</blog-post>
