<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<blog-post>
  <author-id type="integer">42244</author-id>
  <blog-comments-count type="integer">2</blog-comments-count>
  <blog-post-status-id type="integer">3</blog-post-status-id>
  <body-format>econsultancy_xml</body-format>
  <body-formatted>
  &lt;p&gt;
    &lt;a href="/blog/1270-cbs-buys-london-based-last-fm-for-280m"&gt;Last.fm, acquired by CBS for $280m recently&lt;/a&gt;, managed to grow its business on a fraction of the $50m raised by Slacker -&#160;around &#163;2.5m in VC funding - so why does Slacker need so much? &lt;/p&gt;
  &lt;p&gt;Well, the answer seems to be that &lt;a href="http://www.slacker.com/"&gt;Slacker&lt;/a&gt;, as well as creating a social music recommendation service and&#160;desktop application&#160;a la &lt;a href="http://www.last.fm/"&gt;Last.fm&lt;/a&gt; and &lt;a href="http://www.pandora.com/"&gt;Pandora&lt;/a&gt;, the company also plans a &lt;a href="/blog/920-slacker-launches-web-radio-service"&gt;portable music player&lt;/a&gt; and needs the cash for product development. &lt;/p&gt;
  &lt;p&gt;The portable player will allow users to listen to&#160;their Slacker radio on the move, and communicates with Slacker's servers to keep playlists up to date. &lt;/p&gt;
  &lt;p&gt;Is challenging Apple / Creative / Sony a wise move? Wouldn't it make more sense to create a downloadable app for mobile handsets?&lt;/p&gt;
  &lt;p&gt;This feels like a dangerous move from Slacker, or at least one that will surely haemorrhage lots of cash in the research / product development phase, not to mention the millions they'll need to spend to market the device.&lt;/p&gt;
  &lt;p&gt;Maybe there's no money in internet radio?&lt;/p&gt;
</body-formatted>
  <body-unformatted>&lt;FormattedContent xmlns="http://www.e-consultancy.com/schema/formattedContent/"&gt;
  &lt;Paragraph&gt;
    &lt;Link URL="/blog/1270-cbs-buys-london-based-last-fm-for-280m" Window="New"&gt;Last.fm, acquired by CBS for $280m recently&lt;/Link&gt;, managed to grow its business on a fraction of the $50m raised by Slacker -&#160;around &#163;2.5m in VC funding - so why does Slacker need so much? &lt;/Paragraph&gt;
  &lt;Paragraph&gt;Well, the answer seems to be that &lt;Link URL="http://www.slacker.com/" Window="New"&gt;Slacker&lt;/Link&gt;, as well as creating a social music recommendation service and&#160;desktop application&#160;a la &lt;Link URL="http://www.last.fm/" Window="New"&gt;Last.fm&lt;/Link&gt; and &lt;Link URL="http://www.pandora.com/" Window="New"&gt;Pandora&lt;/Link&gt;, the company also plans a &lt;Link URL="/blog/920-slacker-launches-web-radio-service" Window="New"&gt;portable music player&lt;/Link&gt; and needs the cash for product development. &lt;/Paragraph&gt;
  &lt;Paragraph&gt;The portable player will allow users to listen to&#160;their Slacker radio on the move, and communicates with Slacker's servers to keep playlists up to date. &lt;/Paragraph&gt;
  &lt;Paragraph&gt;Is challenging Apple / Creative / Sony a wise move? Wouldn't it make more sense to create a downloadable app for mobile handsets?&lt;/Paragraph&gt;
  &lt;Paragraph&gt;This feels like a dangerous move from Slacker, or at least one that will surely haemorrhage lots of cash in the research / product development phase, not to mention the millions they'll need to spend to market the device.&lt;/Paragraph&gt;
  &lt;Paragraph&gt;Maybe there's no money in internet radio?&lt;/Paragraph&gt;
&lt;/FormattedContent&gt;</body-unformatted>
  <created-at type="datetime">2007-06-04T11:43:00+01:00</created-at>
  <enabled-blog-comments-count type="integer">0</enabled-blog-comments-count>
  <expertise-level-id type="integer">1</expertise-level-id>
  <extract-format>econsultancy_xml</extract-format>
  <extract-formatted>
  &lt;p&gt;
    &lt;strong&gt;Slacker, a recently launched web radio service, has raised $40m (&#163;20m) in a second round of funding, to add to the&#160;$14.5m (&#163;7.3m)&#160;raised in a Series A round of funding earlier this year. &lt;/strong&gt;
  &lt;/p&gt;
  &lt;p&gt;According to &lt;a href="http://www.pehub.com/wordpress/?p=1059"&gt;peHUB&lt;/a&gt;, Centennial Ventures and Rho Ventures were new investors, while Austin Ventures, Mission Ventures and Sevin Rosen Funds, which had participated in the first round, invested again. &lt;/p&gt;
  &lt;p&gt;And it turns out that Slacker has some serious non-web ambitions...&lt;/p&gt;
</extract-formatted>
  <extract-unformatted>&lt;FormattedContent xmlns="http://www.e-consultancy.com/schema/formattedContent/"&gt;
  &lt;Paragraph&gt;
    &lt;Emphasis&gt;Slacker, a recently launched web radio service, has raised $40m (&#163;20m) in a second round of funding, to add to the&#160;$14.5m (&#163;7.3m)&#160;raised in a Series A round of funding earlier this year. &lt;/Emphasis&gt;
  &lt;/Paragraph&gt;
  &lt;Paragraph&gt;According to &lt;Link URL="http://www.pehub.com/wordpress/?p=1059" Window="New"&gt;peHUB&lt;/Link&gt;, Centennial Ventures and Rho Ventures were new investors, while Austin Ventures, Mission Ventures and Sevin Rosen Funds, which had participated in the first round, invested again. &lt;/Paragraph&gt;
  &lt;Paragraph&gt;And it turns out that Slacker has some serious non-web ambitions...&lt;/Paragraph&gt;
&lt;/FormattedContent&gt;</extract-unformatted>
  <featured type="boolean">false</featured>
  <id type="integer">1297</id>
  <learn-more-formatted nil="true"></learn-more-formatted>
  <learn-more-unformatted nil="true"></learn-more-unformatted>
  <legacy-article-id type="integer">363472</legacy-article-id>
  <name>Web radio firm Slacker raises $40m in funding</name>
  <private type="boolean">false</private>
  <published-at type="datetime">2007-06-04T15:37:00+01:00</published-at>
  <slug>web-radio-firm-slacker-raises-40m-in-funding</slug>
  <tweetbacks-updated-at type="datetime">2009-04-28T22:50:45+01:00</tweetbacks-updated-at>
  <unpublished-at type="datetime" nil="true"></unpublished-at>
  <updated-at type="datetime">2009-04-28T22:50:45+01:00</updated-at>
  <views-count type="integer">432</views-count>
</blog-post>
