<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<blog-post>
  <author-id type="integer">7526</author-id>
  <blog-comments-count type="integer">0</blog-comments-count>
  <blog-post-status-id type="integer">3</blog-post-status-id>
  <body-format>econsultancy_xml</body-format>
  <body-formatted>
  &lt;p&gt;Now Jake Winebaum and Sky Dayton are reportedly auctioning the site.&lt;/p&gt;
  &lt;p&gt;The estimated price tag would be around 53 times the original sale price and three and a half times its annual earnings.&lt;/p&gt;
  &lt;p&gt;Business.com, which nowadays helps companies find products and services and which last year launched a how-to site called &lt;a href="http://www.work.com"&gt;Work.com&lt;/a&gt;, said its traffic grew 50% in the first quarter of the year.&lt;/p&gt;
  &lt;p&gt;The domain name is likely to be one of the snappiest and easiest to remember on the net. &lt;/p&gt;
  &lt;p&gt;The Journal reckons possible buyers include the New York Times Company and its own Dow Jones parent.&lt;/p&gt;
</body-formatted>
  <body-unformatted>&lt;FormattedContent xmlns="http://www.e-consultancy.com/schema/formattedContent/"&gt;
  &lt;Paragraph&gt;Now Jake Winebaum and Sky Dayton are reportedly auctioning the site.&lt;/Paragraph&gt;
  &lt;Paragraph&gt;The estimated price tag would be around 53 times the original sale price and three and a half times its annual earnings.&lt;/Paragraph&gt;
  &lt;Paragraph&gt;Business.com, which nowadays helps companies find products and services and which last year launched a how-to site called &lt;Link URL="http://www.work.com" Window="New"&gt;Work.com&lt;/Link&gt;, said its traffic grew 50% in the first quarter of the year.&lt;/Paragraph&gt;
  &lt;Paragraph&gt;The domain name is likely to be one of the snappiest and easiest to remember on the net. &lt;/Paragraph&gt;
  &lt;Paragraph&gt;The Journal reckons possible buyers include the New York Times Company and its own Dow Jones parent.&lt;/Paragraph&gt;
&lt;/FormattedContent&gt;</body-unformatted>
  <created-at type="datetime">2007-06-25T09:03:00+01:00</created-at>
  <enabled-blog-comments-count type="integer">0</enabled-blog-comments-count>
  <expertise-level-id type="integer">1</expertise-level-id>
  <extract-format>econsultancy_xml</extract-format>
  <extract-formatted>
  &lt;p&gt;
    &lt;strong&gt;Domain name &lt;a href="http://www.business.com"&gt;Business.com&lt;/a&gt; could sell for between $300m and $400m this year, according to a &lt;a href="http://online.wsj.com/article/SB118248076104444461-search.html?KEYWORDS=business.com&amp;amp;COLLECTION=wsjie/6month"&gt;report&lt;/a&gt; in the Wall Street Journal.&lt;/strong&gt;
  &lt;/p&gt;
  &lt;p&gt;The name went for a then record $7.5m when it was bought by two entrepreneurs at the height of the dotcom boom in 1999.&lt;/p&gt;
</extract-formatted>
  <extract-unformatted>&lt;FormattedContent xmlns="http://www.e-consultancy.com/schema/formattedContent/"&gt;
  &lt;Paragraph&gt;
    &lt;Emphasis&gt;Domain name &lt;Link URL="http://www.business.com" Window="New"&gt;Business.com&lt;/Link&gt; could sell for between $300m and $400m this year, according to a &lt;Link URL="http://online.wsj.com/article/SB118248076104444461-search.html?KEYWORDS=business.com&amp;amp;COLLECTION=wsjie/6month" Window="New"&gt;report&lt;/Link&gt; in the Wall Street Journal.&lt;/Emphasis&gt;
  &lt;/Paragraph&gt;
  &lt;Paragraph&gt;The name went for a then record $7.5m when it was bought by two entrepreneurs at the height of the dotcom boom in 1999.&lt;/Paragraph&gt;
&lt;/FormattedContent&gt;</extract-unformatted>
  <featured type="boolean">false</featured>
  <id type="integer">1397</id>
  <learn-more-formatted nil="true"></learn-more-formatted>
  <learn-more-unformatted nil="true"></learn-more-unformatted>
  <legacy-article-id type="integer">363638</legacy-article-id>
  <name>Business.com could sell again for new record</name>
  <private type="boolean">false</private>
  <published-at type="datetime">2007-06-25T09:44:00+01:00</published-at>
  <slug>business-com-could-sell-again-for-new-record</slug>
  <tweetbacks-updated-at type="datetime">2009-04-28T22:52:23+01:00</tweetbacks-updated-at>
  <unpublished-at type="datetime" nil="true"></unpublished-at>
  <updated-at type="datetime">2009-04-28T22:52:23+01:00</updated-at>
  <views-count type="integer">347</views-count>
</blog-post>
