<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<blog-post>
  <author-id type="integer">42244</author-id>
  <blog-comments-count type="integer">0</blog-comments-count>
  <blog-post-status-id type="integer">3</blog-post-status-id>
  <body-format>econsultancy_xml</body-format>
  <body-formatted>
  &lt;p&gt;IBM's &lt;a href="http://03.ibm.com/industries/media/doc/content/resource/thought/2819300111.html"&gt;'End of advertising'&lt;/a&gt; survey was completed by 2,400 consumers and 80 ad execs. The lead findings were neither here nor there: 40% of respondents found online video ads more annoying than any other format. And roughly the same amount found them less annoying. &lt;/p&gt;
  &lt;p&gt;Similar studies have found that most people aren't too fond of&#160;&lt;a href="/blog/453-users-turned-off-by-in-stream-video-ads"&gt;in-stream ads&lt;/a&gt;.&#160;By contrast, less-intrusive video ad formats like placements and text links weren't so loathed. &lt;/p&gt;
  &lt;p&gt;All of this is something that the video sites are considering carefully; the balance between user experience and revenue. Most people will tolerate a certain level of advertising in return for free content,&#160;provided they are kept short, especially pre-roll ads. &lt;/p&gt;
  &lt;p&gt;Meanwhile, a recent Advertising.com report found that&#160;&lt;a href="/blog/1680-advertisers-face-video-balancing-act"&gt;63% of consumers preferred shorter ads&lt;/a&gt;. A YouGov study backs this up: 93% of UK web users are prepared to view pre-rolls so long as they are no longer than 15 seconds. &lt;/p&gt;
  &lt;p&gt;There are of course other ad options available, which users may prefer to in-stream ads. Google/YouTube has rolled out an overlay&#160;format - it covers 20% of the screen and allows the viewer to choose whether or not to watch the ad in full. &lt;/p&gt;
  &lt;p&gt;Meanwhile,&#160;InSkin Media&#160;recently &lt;a href="/blog/1904-inskin-media-s-unobtrusive-video-ad-format"&gt;announced a new video ad format&lt;/a&gt; that wraps around the video, though it remains to be seen whether or not this will annoy viewers.&#160;&#160;&lt;/p&gt;
  &lt;p&gt;
    &lt;strong&gt;Related stories:&lt;/strong&gt;
    &lt;br /&gt;
    &lt;a href="/blog/1664-google-launches-in-video-ads-on-youtube"&gt;Google launches in-video ads on YouTube&lt;/a&gt;
  &lt;/p&gt;
</body-formatted>
  <body-unformatted>&lt;FormattedContent xmlns="http://www.e-consultancy.com/schema/formattedContent/"&gt;
  &lt;Paragraph&gt;IBM's &lt;Link URL="http://03.ibm.com/industries/media/doc/content/resource/thought/2819300111.html" Window="Self"&gt;'End of advertising'&lt;/Link&gt; survey was completed by 2,400 consumers and 80 ad execs. The lead findings were neither here nor there: 40% of respondents found online video ads more annoying than any other format. And roughly the same amount found them less annoying. &lt;/Paragraph&gt;
  &lt;Paragraph&gt;Similar studies have found that most people aren't too fond of&#160;&lt;Link URL="/blog/453-users-turned-off-by-in-stream-video-ads" Window="Self"&gt;in-stream ads&lt;/Link&gt;.&#160;By contrast, less-intrusive video ad formats like placements and text links weren't so loathed. &lt;/Paragraph&gt;
  &lt;Paragraph&gt;All of this is something that the video sites are considering carefully; the balance between user experience and revenue. Most people will tolerate a certain level of advertising in return for free content,&#160;provided they are kept short, especially pre-roll ads. &lt;/Paragraph&gt;
  &lt;Paragraph&gt;Meanwhile, a recent Advertising.com report found that&#160;&lt;Link URL="/blog/1680-advertisers-face-video-balancing-act" Window="Self"&gt;63% of consumers preferred shorter ads&lt;/Link&gt;. A YouGov study backs this up: 93% of UK web users are prepared to view pre-rolls so long as they are no longer than 15 seconds. &lt;/Paragraph&gt;
  &lt;Paragraph&gt;There are of course other ad options available, which users may prefer to in-stream ads. Google/YouTube has rolled out an overlay&#160;format - it covers 20% of the screen and allows the viewer to choose whether or not to watch the ad in full. &lt;/Paragraph&gt;
  &lt;Paragraph&gt;Meanwhile,&#160;InSkin Media&#160;recently &lt;Link URL="/blog/1904-inskin-media-s-unobtrusive-video-ad-format" Window="Self"&gt;announced a new video ad format&lt;/Link&gt; that wraps around the video, though it remains to be seen whether or not this will annoy viewers.&#160;&#160;&lt;/Paragraph&gt;
  &lt;Paragraph&gt;
    &lt;Emphasis&gt;Related stories:&lt;/Emphasis&gt;
    &lt;LineBreak /&gt;
    &lt;Link URL="/blog/1664-google-launches-in-video-ads-on-youtube" Window="Self"&gt;Google launches in-video ads on YouTube&lt;/Link&gt;
  &lt;/Paragraph&gt;
&lt;/FormattedContent&gt;</body-unformatted>
  <created-at type="datetime">2007-11-12T11:55:00+00:00</created-at>
  <enabled-blog-comments-count type="integer">0</enabled-blog-comments-count>
  <expertise-level-id type="integer">1</expertise-level-id>
  <extract-format>econsultancy_xml</extract-format>
  <extract-formatted>
  &lt;p&gt;
    &lt;strong&gt;YouTube and its challengers may be able to earn subscription revenues, if the findings of a new IBM report are accurate.&lt;/strong&gt;
  &lt;/p&gt;
  &lt;p&gt;The study found that the TiVo generation is officially online, with 11% of respondents happy to pay '&lt;em&gt;a little' &lt;/em&gt;to remove all advertising from videos. &lt;/p&gt;
  &lt;p&gt;
    &lt;em&gt;Consider the numbers: &lt;/em&gt;Google-owned YouTube pulls in something like 50m unique users a month; let's assume it can charge 'a little', a couple of dollars a month maybe - let's round it up to $24.99 a year for&#160;a 'premium user' service. Now let's&#160;assume that 11% of users sign up. That's a revenue&#160;stream worth $137m annually...&lt;/p&gt;
</extract-formatted>
  <extract-unformatted>&lt;FormattedContent xmlns="http://www.e-consultancy.com/schema/formattedContent/"&gt;
  &lt;Paragraph&gt;
    &lt;Emphasis&gt;YouTube and its challengers may be able to earn subscription revenues, if the findings of a new IBM report are accurate.&lt;/Emphasis&gt;
  &lt;/Paragraph&gt;
  &lt;Paragraph&gt;The study found that the TiVo generation is officially online, with 11% of respondents happy to pay '&lt;Quote&gt;a little' &lt;/Quote&gt;to remove all advertising from videos. &lt;/Paragraph&gt;
  &lt;Paragraph&gt;
    &lt;Quote&gt;Consider the numbers: &lt;/Quote&gt;Google-owned YouTube pulls in something like 50m unique users a month; let's assume it can charge 'a little', a couple of dollars a month maybe - let's round it up to $24.99 a year for&#160;a 'premium user' service. Now let's&#160;assume that 11% of users sign up. That's a revenue&#160;stream worth $137m annually...&lt;/Paragraph&gt;
&lt;/FormattedContent&gt;</extract-unformatted>
  <featured type="boolean">false</featured>
  <id type="integer">1931</id>
  <learn-more-formatted>&lt;p&gt;For stats relating to online video, see Econsultancy's &lt;strong&gt;&lt;a href="http://econsultancy.com/reports/technology-adoption-statistics"&gt;Technology Adoption Statistics Compendium&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/strong&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;</learn-more-formatted>
  <learn-more-unformatted>&lt;p&gt;For stats relating to online video, see Econsultancy's &lt;strong&gt;&lt;a href="http://econsultancy.com/reports/technology-adoption-statistics"&gt;Technology Adoption Statistics Compendium&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/strong&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;</learn-more-unformatted>
  <legacy-article-id type="integer">364572</legacy-article-id>
  <name>One in 10 will pay to remove YouTube ads</name>
  <private type="boolean">false</private>
  <published-at type="datetime">2007-11-12T17:15:00+00:00</published-at>
  <slug>one-in-10-will-pay-to-remove-youtube-ads</slug>
  <tweetbacks-updated-at type="datetime">2009-04-30T06:36:42+01:00</tweetbacks-updated-at>
  <unpublished-at type="datetime" nil="true"></unpublished-at>
  <updated-at type="datetime">2009-10-13T09:24:46+01:00</updated-at>
  <views-count type="integer">981</views-count>
</blog-post>
