<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<blog-post>
  <author-id type="integer">42244</author-id>
  <blog-comments-count type="integer">0</blog-comments-count>
  <blog-post-status-id type="integer">3</blog-post-status-id>
  <body-format>econsultancy_xml</body-format>
  <body-formatted>
  &lt;p&gt;Online ad revenues for US newspapers have been increasing for the past three years, with &lt;a href="/blog/1272-us-newspaper-online-ad-revenues-increase"&gt;Q3 ad revenues up 22.3% on 2006&lt;/a&gt;. &lt;/p&gt;
  &lt;p&gt;Many&#160;former proponents of the subscription model, including the New York Times, have&#160;therefore&#160;come round to the idea of free access, calculating that they can make more money by ditching their charges. &lt;/p&gt;
  &lt;p&gt;But last month, &lt;a href="/blog/1797-ft-com-changes-its-subscription-model"&gt;FT.com&#160;opted for a&#160;hybrid approach&lt;/a&gt;, letting&#160;readers&#160;access 30 articles per month free of charge. &lt;/p&gt;
  &lt;p&gt;The WSJ&#160;has also just struck a deal&#160;with social news site Digg, so perhaps Murdoch's lit a fire under some people over there since the takeover. The newspaper has &lt;a href="http://blog.digg.com/?p=98"&gt;started to add Digg buttons to stories&lt;/a&gt; and will make articles submitted to the social news site free to view. Radical stuff.&lt;/p&gt;
  &lt;p&gt;
    &lt;strong&gt;Related stories:&lt;/strong&gt;
    &lt;br /&gt;
    &lt;a href="/blog/1909-web-users-prefer-ads-to-charges"&gt;Web users 'prefer ads to charges'&lt;/a&gt;&#160;&#160; &lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href="/blog/1764-newspapers-face-up-to-online-conundrum"&gt;Newspapers face up to online conundrum&lt;/a&gt;&#160;&lt;/p&gt;
</body-formatted>
  <body-unformatted>&lt;FormattedContent xmlns="http://www.e-consultancy.com/schema/formattedContent/"&gt;
  &lt;Paragraph&gt;Online ad revenues for US newspapers have been increasing for the past three years, with &lt;Link URL="/blog/1272-us-newspaper-online-ad-revenues-increase" Window="Self"&gt;Q3 ad revenues up 22.3% on 2006&lt;/Link&gt;. &lt;/Paragraph&gt;
  &lt;Paragraph&gt;Many&#160;former proponents of the subscription model, including the New York Times, have&#160;therefore&#160;come round to the idea of free access, calculating that they can make more money by ditching their charges. &lt;/Paragraph&gt;
  &lt;Paragraph&gt;But last month, &lt;Link URL="/blog/1797-ft-com-changes-its-subscription-model" Window="Self"&gt;FT.com&#160;opted for a&#160;hybrid approach&lt;/Link&gt;, letting&#160;readers&#160;access 30 articles per month free of charge. &lt;/Paragraph&gt;
  &lt;Paragraph&gt;The WSJ&#160;has also just struck a deal&#160;with social news site Digg, so perhaps Murdoch's lit a fire under some people over there since the takeover. The newspaper has &lt;Link URL="http://blog.digg.com/?p=98" Window="Self"&gt;started to add Digg buttons to stories&lt;/Link&gt; and will make articles submitted to the social news site free to view. Radical stuff.&lt;/Paragraph&gt;
  &lt;Paragraph&gt;
    &lt;Emphasis&gt;Related stories:&lt;/Emphasis&gt;
    &lt;LineBreak /&gt;
    &lt;Link URL="/blog/1909-web-users-prefer-ads-to-charges" Window="Self"&gt;Web users 'prefer ads to charges'&lt;/Link&gt;&#160;&#160; &lt;LineBreak /&gt;&lt;Link URL="/blog/1764-newspapers-face-up-to-online-conundrum" Window="Self"&gt;Newspapers face up to online conundrum&lt;/Link&gt;&#160;&lt;/Paragraph&gt;
&lt;/FormattedContent&gt;</body-unformatted>
  <created-at type="datetime">2007-11-14T12:51:00+00:00</created-at>
  <enabled-blog-comments-count type="integer">0</enabled-blog-comments-count>
  <expertise-level-id type="integer">1</expertise-level-id>
  <extract-format>econsultancy_xml</extract-format>
  <extract-formatted>
  &lt;p&gt;
    &lt;strong&gt;Rupert Murdoch has said he is planning to make the Wall Street Journal free to access on the web, following its recent purchase by News Corp.&lt;/strong&gt;&#160;&lt;/p&gt;
  &lt;p&gt;The &lt;a href="http://online.wsj.com/public/us"&gt;paper&lt;/a&gt;, one of the few that still charges subscriptions, earns around $50m per&#160;year from 1m users but hopes to&#160;generate more cash by increasing its traffic. &lt;/p&gt;
  &lt;p&gt;Speaking in Australia, Murdoch said: &lt;/p&gt;
  &lt;blockquote&gt;
    &lt;p&gt;
      &lt;em&gt;"We are studying it and we expect to make that free, and instead of having 1m (subscribers), having at least 10m to 15m in every corner of the earth."&lt;/em&gt;
    &lt;/p&gt;
  &lt;/blockquote&gt;
</extract-formatted>
  <extract-unformatted>&lt;FormattedContent xmlns="http://www.e-consultancy.com/schema/formattedContent/"&gt;
  &lt;Paragraph&gt;
    &lt;Emphasis&gt;Rupert Murdoch has said he is planning to make the Wall Street Journal free to access on the web, following its recent purchase by News Corp.&lt;/Emphasis&gt;&#160;&lt;/Paragraph&gt;
  &lt;Paragraph&gt;The &lt;Link URL="http://online.wsj.com/public/us" Window="Self"&gt;paper&lt;/Link&gt;, one of the few that still charges subscriptions, earns around $50m per&#160;year from 1m users but hopes to&#160;generate more cash by increasing its traffic. &lt;/Paragraph&gt;
  &lt;Paragraph&gt;Speaking in Australia, Murdoch said: &lt;/Paragraph&gt;
  &lt;Block&gt;
    &lt;Paragraph&gt;
      &lt;Quote&gt;"We are studying it and we expect to make that free, and instead of having 1m (subscribers), having at least 10m to 15m in every corner of the earth."&lt;/Quote&gt;
    &lt;/Paragraph&gt;
  &lt;/Block&gt;
&lt;/FormattedContent&gt;</extract-unformatted>
  <featured type="boolean">false</featured>
  <id type="integer">1942</id>
  <learn-more-formatted nil="true"></learn-more-formatted>
  <learn-more-unformatted nil="true"></learn-more-unformatted>
  <legacy-article-id type="integer">364590</legacy-article-id>
  <name>Murdoch to make WSJ content free</name>
  <private type="boolean">false</private>
  <published-at type="datetime">2007-11-14T13:59:00+00:00</published-at>
  <slug>murdoch-to-make-wsj-content-free</slug>
  <tweetbacks-updated-at type="datetime">2009-04-28T23:01:31+01:00</tweetbacks-updated-at>
  <unpublished-at type="datetime" nil="true"></unpublished-at>
  <updated-at type="datetime">2009-04-28T23:01:31+01:00</updated-at>
  <views-count type="integer">156</views-count>
</blog-post>
