<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<blog-post>
  <author-id type="integer">68581</author-id>
  <blog-comments-count type="integer">5</blog-comments-count>
  <blog-post-status-id type="integer">3</blog-post-status-id>
  <body-format>econsultancy_xml</body-format>
  <body-formatted>
  &lt;p&gt;Matt Cutts and other Google employees quickly explained that the rumours were false but the issue raised some interesting points.&lt;/p&gt;
  &lt;p&gt;John Mu, a Google employee, &lt;a href="http://groups.google.com/group/Google_Webmaster_Help-Indexing/browse_thread/thread/644d43e62840ed88/3526b8e4a69dbf1e?lnk=raot"&gt;stated&lt;/a&gt; that:&lt;/p&gt;
  &lt;blockquote&gt;
    &lt;p&gt;
      &lt;em&gt;"I would not worry too much about a blog post that doesn't seem to exist. That said, keep in mind that PageRank is roughly based on the quantity and quality of the links pointing to a page. Traffic from self-created bookmarks does not really play a role in that, at least not directly. &lt;/em&gt;
    &lt;/p&gt;
    &lt;p&gt;
      &lt;em&gt;"If you have great, unique and compelling content then chances are that people will want to refer their friends to it, no matter if they&#160;originally found the link to your site on a social bookmarking site or through word of mouth."&lt;/em&gt;
    &lt;/p&gt;
  &lt;/blockquote&gt;
  &lt;p&gt;The key is that Google wants to count natural links that are editorially given.&#160;It doesn't want to count links that site owners create themselves. &lt;/p&gt;
  &lt;p&gt;If you bookmark your site on Digg or del.icio.us and you are the only person that votes for it then there is no reason the link should help you.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Ideally Google would only count links that became popular or even discount all social bookmarking links altogether.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;My takeaway from this is that social bookmarking is a means to get links from blogs - you shouldn't be relying on links from the bookmarking sites themselves.&lt;/p&gt;
</body-formatted>
  <body-unformatted>&lt;FormattedContent xmlns="http://www.e-consultancy.com/schema/formattedContent/"&gt;
  &lt;Paragraph&gt;Matt Cutts and other Google employees quickly explained that the rumours were false but the issue raised some interesting points.&lt;/Paragraph&gt;
  &lt;Paragraph&gt;John Mu, a Google employee, &lt;Link URL="http://groups.google.com/group/Google_Webmaster_Help-Indexing/browse_thread/thread/644d43e62840ed88/3526b8e4a69dbf1e?lnk=raot" Window="Self"&gt;stated&lt;/Link&gt; that:&lt;/Paragraph&gt;
  &lt;Block&gt;
    &lt;Paragraph&gt;
      &lt;Quote&gt;"I would not worry too much about a blog post that doesn't seem to exist. That said, keep in mind that PageRank is roughly based on the quantity and quality of the links pointing to a page. Traffic from self-created bookmarks does not really play a role in that, at least not directly. &lt;/Quote&gt;
    &lt;/Paragraph&gt;
    &lt;Paragraph&gt;
      &lt;Quote&gt;"If you have great, unique and compelling content then chances are that people will want to refer their friends to it, no matter if they&#160;originally found the link to your site on a social bookmarking site or through word of mouth."&lt;/Quote&gt;
    &lt;/Paragraph&gt;
  &lt;/Block&gt;
  &lt;Paragraph&gt;The key is that Google wants to count natural links that are editorially given.&#160;It doesn't want to count links that site owners create themselves. &lt;/Paragraph&gt;
  &lt;Paragraph&gt;If you bookmark your site on Digg or del.icio.us and you are the only person that votes for it then there is no reason the link should help you.&lt;LineBreak /&gt;&lt;LineBreak /&gt;Ideally Google would only count links that became popular or even discount all social bookmarking links altogether.&lt;LineBreak /&gt;&lt;LineBreak /&gt;My takeaway from this is that social bookmarking is a means to get links from blogs - you shouldn't be relying on links from the bookmarking sites themselves.&lt;/Paragraph&gt;
&lt;/FormattedContent&gt;</body-unformatted>
  <created-at type="datetime">2008-03-19T14:18:00+00:00</created-at>
  <enabled-blog-comments-count type="integer">4</enabled-blog-comments-count>
  <expertise-level-id type="integer">1</expertise-level-id>
  <extract-format>econsultancy_xml</extract-format>
  <extract-formatted>
  &lt;p&gt;
    &lt;strong&gt;The SEO community was the victim of an interesting hoax this week when a blogger&lt;/strong&gt;
    &lt;a href="http://startupearth.com/2008/03/07/google-to-punish-pagerank-for-digg-stories/"&gt;
      &lt;strong&gt;claimed&lt;/strong&gt;
    &lt;/a&gt;
    &lt;strong&gt;that Google was about to punish sites that relied on social bookmarking to build links.&lt;/strong&gt;
  &lt;/p&gt;
</extract-formatted>
  <extract-unformatted>&lt;FormattedContent xmlns="http://www.e-consultancy.com/schema/formattedContent/"&gt;
  &lt;Paragraph&gt;
    &lt;Emphasis&gt;The SEO community was the victim of an interesting hoax this week when a blogger&lt;/Emphasis&gt;
    &lt;Link URL="http://startupearth.com/2008/03/07/google-to-punish-pagerank-for-digg-stories/" Window="Self"&gt;
      &lt;Emphasis&gt;claimed&lt;/Emphasis&gt;
    &lt;/Link&gt;
    &lt;Emphasis&gt;that Google was about to punish sites that relied on social bookmarking to build links.&lt;/Emphasis&gt;
  &lt;/Paragraph&gt;
&lt;/FormattedContent&gt;</extract-unformatted>
  <featured type="boolean">false</featured>
  <id type="integer">2293</id>
  <learn-more-formatted nil="true"></learn-more-formatted>
  <learn-more-unformatted nil="true"></learn-more-unformatted>
  <legacy-article-id type="integer">365294</legacy-article-id>
  <name>Google and social bookmarking</name>
  <private type="boolean">false</private>
  <published-at type="datetime">2008-03-19T15:00:00+00:00</published-at>
  <slug>google-and-social-bookmarking</slug>
  <tweetbacks-updated-at type="datetime">2009-04-28T23:07:19+01:00</tweetbacks-updated-at>
  <unpublished-at type="datetime" nil="true"></unpublished-at>
  <updated-at type="datetime">2009-04-28T23:07:19+01:00</updated-at>
  <views-count type="integer">423</views-count>
</blog-post>
