172

html

A few caveats before we dive in: <ol> <li>I only really talk about Google in terms of search engines as it is so dominant and this is particularly true for us.</li> <li>When I talk about search ‘rankings’, what I really mean is the volume of organically referred search traffic. Ranking obsession is dangerous and increasingly pointless as everyone sees their own personalised results. So ‘ranking’ I use really as a proxy for search-referred site visits.</li> <li>I’m not a great believer in PageRank in as far as you can have a high PageRank and not get rankings and vice versa. So when I talk about PageRank here I mean in the vaguest possible sense of ‘reputation’ or ‘credibility’ or ‘authority’.</li> <li>I’m also pretty sceptical about anything that Google shows in the main search engine as being anything other than vaguely indicative e.g. the site: or link: commands don’t give data that is even nearly accurate or complete.</li> </ol> Background to Site Changes The reasons for completely updating the site are explained in my <a href="http://econsultancy.com/blog/3074-ashley-friedlein-talks-about-the-new-econsultancy-site">interview about the new Econsultancy site</a>. Further details are given in our press release <a href="http://econsultancy.com/press-releases/4007-econsultancy-invests-500-000-into-new-website">Econsultancy invests $500,000 into new website</a>. On the domain change from <a href="http://www.e-consultancy.com/">http://www.e-consultancy.com</a> to <a href="http://econsultancy.com/">http://econsultancy.com</a> I’ve also posted a reply to a question on this in our forum: “<a href="http://econsultancy.com/forums/best-practice/why-did-econsultancy-drop-the-www">Why did Econsultancy drop the www?</a>”. What did we do from an SEO point of view for the site migration? The short version of ‘what we did’ from an SEO migration point of view was only two things: Firstly, we used <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/HTTP_301">301 Moved Permanently redirects</a> for all old pages which had corresponding pages on the new site. We did this by exporting all the links (80,000+) that Google told us about via <a href="http://www.google.com/webmasters/tools/">Google Webmaster Tools</a>’ “Links > Pages with external links” and writing a script to do all the redirects where there were database IDs for the old and corresponding new content, making the mapping and redirects quite straight forwards even at this volume. Then we did non-database-d content (e.g. flat HTML pages, including the ‘About’ sections, key section pages etc.) ‘manually’. Secondly, we verified the new site within Google Webmaster Tools so that we could keep an eye on how it was being crawled and so on. We also set the geographic target audience to ‘United States’ here given our business and content is increasingly there. Previously this wasn’t set to anything. We didn’t contact Google in any way (I don’t think you can?), and we didn’t do anything in phases – more of a Big Bang approach! What has happened to our natural Search Referrals since the new site launch? The graph below, showing, in Google Analytics, the number of non-paid visits referred by Google since the launch, tells the story best. We had a brief honeymoon period where we got ‘double rankings’ where the old site and the corresponding page on the new site *both* ranked well on Google meaning our page coverage was outstanding. On the old site we used to get around 3,500 visits a day referred by Google natural search – here we peaked at over 4,000. And then things went a bit quiet... It was Christmas so this is not atypical. But it hasn’t picked up since. Following are some more details broken down by time period following the relaunch. <img alt="Econsultancy Google Referrals" height="175" src="http://farm4.static.flickr.com/3488/3253405538_dc46da21bd_o.jpg" style="border: 1px solid black; margin-left: 0px; margin-right: 0px;" width="480" /> Weeks 1-2 following site relaunch <ul> <li>Rankings / Referred Natural Search Traffic: This went up in the first week (as you can see from graph above) as we ‘double-ranked’ for both the old site and the corresponding page on the new site giving us great page coverage. It then fell away – not unusual given it was Christmas / New Year which is historically very quiet for us.</li> <li>Indexation / De-indexation: The old site was still all showing in Google and in Webmaster tools. The new site was being indexed however – around 20% had been indexed by the end of the second week.</li> <li> External Page Links: We were getting links to the new site (around 50 a day) but these weren’t visible in Google Webmaster Tools. Legacy links still showed as pointing to the old domain.</li> <li>PageRank: Nothing showing on the new site. </li> <li>Other e.g. Site links, Google News, Google Alerts, Images etc.: Our Sitelinks (the sub-links to site sections shown in the search results) disappeared. And our Google News Feed was broken so we contacted Google News to get this fixed. Likewise Google Alerts for our domain dried up.</li> </ul> Weeks 3-4 following site relaunch <ul> <li>Rankings / Referred Natural Search Traffic: No improvement in search traffic as per graph above. And the referrals we do get are almost all searches on our brand name or for ‘long tail’ keywords for newly created content which has new links since the launch i.e. the legacy content doesn’t appear to be ranking any more.</li> <li>Indexation / De-indexation: The old site now had only 7,590 pages showing in the index (using <a href="http://www.google.co.uk/search?hl=en&rlz=1C1GGLS_en-GBGB291GB303&q=site:www.e-consultancy.com&btnG=Search&meta=">site:www.e-consultancy.com</a>) when it had been over 40,000 before the changeover. So the de-indexing was happening very fast. The indexation of the new site was also up to over 20,000 pages, around one third of the actual number of pages (using <a href="http://www.google.co.uk/search?hl=en&rlz=1C1GGLS_en-GBGB291GB303&q=site:econsultancy.com&btnG=Search&meta=">site:econsultancy.com</a>).</li> <li>External Page Links: New links were showing up in Google Webmaster Tools to the new site. Legacy links to the old site no longer showed up as pointing to the old domain, however neither did they show up as pointing (via 301 redirects) to the new site. They seemed to have ‘disappeared’.</li> <li>PageRank: Now showing on the new site. All the key section pages (<a href="http://econsultancy.com/reports">Reports</a>, <a href="http://econsultancy.com/training">Training</a>, <a href="http://econsultancy.com/events">Events</a>, <a href="http://econsultancy.com/jobs">Jobs</a>, <a href="http://econsultancy.com/directories">Directories</a>, <a href="http://econsultancy.com/blog">Blog</a>, <a href="http://econsultancy.com/forums">Forums</a>) maintained their PageRank, or it improved. The Blog has the highest PageRank (due, no doubt to the large number of inbound links) at 6. Strangely, however, our homepage’s PageRank had dropped from 5 to 3. This might be because our new homepage, for non-logged in visitors like the Googlebot, has less dynamic content on it so fewer links and less frequently updated content?</li> <li>Other e.g. Site links, Google News, Google Alerts, Images etc.: Our Sitelinks reappeared in Google Webmaster Tools at week 4 and then almost immediately in the main index (<a href="http://www.google.co.uk/search?q=econsultancy&sourceid=navclient-ff&ie=UTF-8&rlz=1B3GGGL_enGB308GB308">search on Econsultancy to see main listing</a>). Our Google News Feed was back up and running (see <a href="http://news.google.com/news?ie=UTF-8&as_drrb=q&as_qdr=m&q=site:econsultancy.com&scoring=n">recent stories on Google News</a>) and we were coming through in Google Alerts as before.</li> </ul> Weeks 5-6 (now) following site relaunch <ul> <li>Rankings / Referred Natural Search Traffic: Still no improvement in search traffic as per graph above and the referrals we do get are still predominantly brand searches. By now, if you search on the old ‘<a href="http://www.google.co.uk/search?rlz=1C1GGLS_en-GBGB291GB303&aq=f&sourceid=chrome&ie=UTF-8&q=e-consultancy">e-consultancy</a>’ Google brings back results only from the new site, so it appears to know that what was once ‘e-consultancy’ at the old domain, is now only at the new domain.</li> <li>Indexation / De-indexation: The old site now has only 1,490 pages showing in the index (using <a href="http://www.google.co.uk/search?hl=en&rlz=1C1GGLS_en-GBGB291GB303&q=site:www.e-consultancy.com&btnG=Search&meta=">site:www.e-consultancy.com</a>). The indexation of the new site has gone up to 26,500 pages (using <a href="http://www.google.co.uk/search?hl=en&rlz=1C1GGLS_en-GBGB291GB303&q=site:econsultancy.com&btnG=Search&meta=">site:econsultancy.com</a> in Google). <a href="http://siteexplorer.search.yahoo.com/search?p=http%3A%2F%2Feconsultancy.com&bwmf=s">Yahoo! shows more at 33,000+</a>.</li> <li>External Page Links: As per graphic below all legacy links are now showing in Webmaster Tools (over 90,000) as linking to the new site, so it appears that Google has figured out that the old pages have ‘become’ their new equivalents. However, this is not reflected on the main index using the <a href="http://www.google.com/search?sa=N&tab=nw&q=link:econsultancy.com">link:econsultancy.com</a> command which shows only the links acquired since launch – 563 at the time of writing. Yahoo! is now showing 52,444 inbound links to the new domain (using <a href="http://siteexplorer.search.yahoo.com/search?p=http%3A%2F%2Feconsultancy.com&bwm=i&bwmo=&bwmf=s">Yahoo! Site Explorer</a>). Checking for links to the old domain on Google (<a href="http://www.google.co.uk/search?hl=en&rlz=1C1GGLS_en-GBGB291GB303&q=link%3Awww.e-consultancy.com&btnG=Search&meta=">link:www.e-consultancy.com</a>) now brings back the same results as for link:econsultancy.com so, again, Google appears to understand they are the same thing and that ‘econsultancy.com’ is now the primary / master domain.</li> <li>PageRank: No change – as above.</li> <li>Other e.g. Site links, Google News, Google Alerts, Images etc.: No change – as above.</li> </ul> <img alt="Econsultancy external page links" height="417" src="http://farm4.static.flickr.com/3021/3253405612_4e7d1c6a7a_o.jpg" style="border: 1px solid black; margin-left: 0px; margin-right: 0px;" width="480" /> So what are we working on now? A number of things including: <ul> <li>Looking at ‘Not found’ 404 errors reported within Webmaster Tools’ “Diagnostics > Web crawl” to 301 redirect any pages we can.</li> <li>Updating key links to our new domain – we can’t expect to update all 50,000+ but, for some, e.g. our <a href="http://www.dmoz.org/">dmoz.org</a> listing we’re making the effort.</li> <li>Continuing to get new links for the new site. Though this is mostly done via focusing on content and marketing/PR as opposed to explicit ‘link building’ efforts. The latter includes listings sites and directories (e.g. for our training and events). Also, we’re continue to build out our feeds and distribution (e.g. jobs data to job aggregators).</li> <li>Working on getting images coming through in Google News and Alerts. Not directly an SEO thing, however. More about increasing click throughs – to then get links, to improve SEO indirectly.</li> <li>Doing more PPC to make up for shortfall in natural search traffic. No wonder Google is in no hurry to make the updates... ;)</li> <li>Bits of on page optimisation and internal link optimisation to promote the relevant pages within the site.</li> <li>Reviewing whether to update the current homepage for non-logged in visitors (including Googlebot) to include more dynamic content so it refreshes more often and has more links and keywords on it. Not convinced this will help but worth a try.</li> </ul> What have we learned? Page/URL changes within a domain seem to be updated pretty fast (within a few weeks) assuming you do the 301 redirects correctly. Not so for domain name changes it would appear. Some people report 4 weeks, some 6, some 90 days, for the latter. We’re at 6 weeks now... The indexation and de-indexation process happened over a matter of weeks too. Webmaster Tools is useful for getting some insight into where Google is up to. However, it’s not clear what time lags there are between what you see in Webmaster Tools and how this translates to the main index. We’re struggling to explain the drop in PageRank for our homepage which has the most inbound links, particularly when PageRank carried across fine in all other instances. Otherwise, we’re playing a waiting game... All that’s now missing is that search traffic. Ask me again in a month whether, in hindsight, we shouldn’t have changed the domain name at all, whatever the brand police might say! (p.s. any useful tips, advice for us going forwards greatly appreciated)

A few caveats before we dive in: <ol> <li>I only really talk about Google in terms of search engines as it is so dominant and this is particularly true for us. </li> <li>When I talk about search ‘rankings’, what I really mean is the volume of organically referred search traffic. Ranking obsession is dangerous and increasingly pointless as everyone sees their own personalised results. So ‘ranking’ I use really as a proxy for search-referred site visits. </li> <li>I’m not a great believer in PageRank in as far as you can have a high PageRank and not get rankings and vice versa. So when I talk about PageRank here I mean in the vaguest possible sense of ‘reputation’ or ‘credibility’ or ‘authority’. </li> <li>I’m also pretty sceptical about anything that Google shows in the main search engine as being anything other than vaguely indicative e.g. the site: or link: commands don’t give data that is even nearly accurate or complete.</li> </ol>   Background to Site Changes The reasons for completely updating the site are explained in my <a href="http://econsultancy.com/blog/3074-ashley-friedlein-talks-about-the-new-econsultancy-site">interview about the new Econsultancy site</a>. Further details are given in our press release <a href="http://econsultancy.com/press-releases/4007-econsultancy-invests-500-000-into-new-website">Econsultancy invests $500,000 into new website</a>. On the domain change from <a href="http://www.e-consultancy.com/">http://www.e-consultancy.com</a> to <a href="http://econsultancy.com/">http://econsultancy.com</a> I’ve also posted a reply to a question on this in our forum: “<a href="http://econsultancy.com/forums/best-practice/why-did-econsultancy-drop-the-www">Why did Econsultancy drop the www?</a>”. What did we do from an SEO point of view for the site migration? The short version of ‘what we did’ from an SEO migration point of view was only two things: Firstly, we used <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/HTTP_301">301 Moved Permanently redirects</a> for all old pages which had corresponding pages on the new site. We did this by exporting all the links (80,000+) that Google told us about via <a href="http://www.google.com/webmasters/tools/">Google Webmaster Tools</a>’ “Links  >  Pages with external links” and writing a script to do all the redirects where there were database IDs for the old and corresponding new content, making the mapping and redirects quite straight forwards even at this volume. Then we did non-database-d content (e.g. flat HTML pages, including the ‘About’ sections, key section pages etc.) ‘manually’. Secondly, we verified the new site within Google Webmaster Tools so that we could keep an eye on how it was being crawled and so on. We also set the geographic target audience to ‘United States’ here given our business and content is increasingly there. Previously this wasn’t set to anything. We didn’t contact Google in any way (I don’t think you can?), and we didn’t do anything in phases – more of a Big Bang approach!   What has happened to our natural Search Referrals since the new site launch? The graph below, showing, in Google Analytics, the number of non-paid visits referred by Google since the launch, tells the story best. We had a brief honeymoon period where we got ‘double rankings’ where the old site and the corresponding page on the new site *both* ranked well on Google meaning our page coverage was outstanding. On the old site we used to get around 3,500 visits a day referred by Google natural search – here we peaked at over 4,000. And then things went a bit quiet... It was Christmas so this is not atypical. But it hasn’t picked up since. Following are some more details broken down by time period following the relaunch. <img style="border: 1px solid black; margin-left: 0px; margin-right: 0px;" src="http://farm4.static.flickr.com/3488/3253405538_dc46da21bd_o.jpg" alt="Econsultancy Google Referrals" width="480" height="175" />   Weeks 1-2 following site relaunch <ul> <li>Rankings / Referred Natural Search Traffic: This went up in the first week (as you can see from graph above) as we ‘double-ranked’ for both the old site and the corresponding page on the new site giving us great page coverage. It then fell away – not unusual given it was Christmas / New Year which is historically very quiet for us. </li> <li>Indexation / De-indexation: The old site was still all showing in Google and in Webmaster tools. The new site was being indexed however – around 20% had been indexed by the end of the second week. </li> <li> External Page Links: We were getting links to the new site (around 50 a day) but these weren’t visible in Google Webmaster Tools. Legacy links still showed as pointing to the old domain. </li> <li>PageRank: Nothing showing on the new site.  </li> <li>Other e.g. Site links, Google News, Google Alerts, Images etc.: Our Sitelinks (the sub-links to site sections shown in the search results) disappeared. And our Google News Feed was broken so we contacted Google News to get this fixed. Likewise Google Alerts for our domain dried up.</li> </ul> Weeks 3-4 following site relaunch <ul> <li>Rankings / Referred Natural Search Traffic: No improvement in search traffic as per graph above. And the referrals we do get are almost all searches on our brand name or for ‘long tail’ keywords for newly created content which has new links since the launch i.e. the legacy content doesn’t appear to be ranking any more. </li> <li>Indexation / De-indexation: The old site now had only 7,590 pages showing in the index (using <a href="http://www.google.co.uk/search?hl=en&rlz=1C1GGLS_en-GBGB291GB303&q=site:www.e-consultancy.com&btnG=Search&meta=">site:www.e-consultancy.com</a>) when it had been over 40,000 before the changeover. So the de-indexing was happening very fast. The indexation of the new site was also up to over 20,000 pages, around one third of the actual number of pages (using <a href="http://www.google.co.uk/search?hl=en&rlz=1C1GGLS_en-GBGB291GB303&q=site:econsultancy.com&btnG=Search&meta=">site:econsultancy.com</a>). </li> <li>External Page Links: New links were showing up in Google Webmaster Tools to the new site. Legacy links to the old site no longer showed up as pointing to the old domain, however neither did they show up as pointing (via 301 redirects) to the new site. They seemed to have ‘disappeared’. </li> <li>PageRank: Now showing on the new site. All the key section pages (<a href="http://econsultancy.com/reports">Reports</a>, <a href="http://econsultancy.com/training">Training</a>, <a href="http://econsultancy.com/events">Events</a>, <a href="http://econsultancy.com/jobs">Jobs</a>, <a href="http://econsultancy.com/directories">Directories</a>, <a href="http://econsultancy.com/blog">Blog</a>, <a href="http://econsultancy.com/forums">Forums</a>) maintained their PageRank, or it improved. The Blog has the highest PageRank (due, no doubt to the large number of inbound links) at 6. Strangely, however, our homepage’s PageRank had dropped from 5 to 3. This might be because our new homepage, for non-logged in visitors like the Googlebot, has less dynamic content on it so fewer links and less frequently updated content? </li> <li>Other e.g. Site links, Google News, Google Alerts, Images etc.: Our Sitelinks reappeared in Google Webmaster Tools at week 4 and then almost immediately in the main index (<a href="http://www.google.co.uk/search?q=econsultancy&sourceid=navclient-ff&ie=UTF-8&rlz=1B3GGGL_enGB308GB308">search on Econsultancy to see main listing</a>). Our Google News Feed was back up and running (see <a href="http://news.google.com/news?ie=UTF-8&as_drrb=q&as_qdr=m&q=site:econsultancy.com&scoring=n">recent stories on Google News</a>) and we were coming through in Google Alerts as before.</li> </ul> Weeks 5-6 (now) following site relaunch <ul> <li>Rankings / Referred Natural Search Traffic: Still no improvement in search traffic as per graph above and the referrals we do get are still predominantly brand searches. By now, if you search on the old ‘<a href="http://www.google.co.uk/search?rlz=1C1GGLS_en-GBGB291GB303&aq=f&sourceid=chrome&ie=UTF-8&q=e-consultancy">e-consultancy</a>’ Google brings back results only from the new site, so it appears to know that what was once ‘e-consultancy’ at the old domain, is now only at the new domain. </li> <li>Indexation / De-indexation: The old site now has only 1,490 pages showing in the index (using <a href="http://www.google.co.uk/search?hl=en&rlz=1C1GGLS_en-GBGB291GB303&q=site:www.e-consultancy.com&btnG=Search&meta=">site:www.e-consultancy.com</a>). The indexation of the new site has gone up to 26,500 pages (using <a href="http://www.google.co.uk/search?hl=en&rlz=1C1GGLS_en-GBGB291GB303&q=site:econsultancy.com&btnG=Search&meta=">site:econsultancy.com</a> in Google). <a href="http://siteexplorer.search.yahoo.com/search?p=http%3A%2F%2Feconsultancy.com&bwmf=s">Yahoo! shows more at 33,000+</a>. </li> <li>External Page Links: As per graphic below all legacy links are now showing in Webmaster Tools (over 90,000) as linking to the new site, so it appears that Google has figured out that the old pages have ‘become’ their new equivalents. However, this is not reflected on the main index using the <a href="http://www.google.com/search?sa=N&tab=nw&q=link:econsultancy.com">link:econsultancy.com</a> command which shows only the links acquired since launch – 563 at the time of writing. Yahoo! is now showing 52,444 inbound links to the new domain (using <a href="http://siteexplorer.search.yahoo.com/search?p=http%3A%2F%2Feconsultancy.com&bwm=i&bwmo=&bwmf=s">Yahoo! Site Explorer</a>). Checking for links to the old domain on Google (<a href="http://www.google.co.uk/search?hl=en&rlz=1C1GGLS_en-GBGB291GB303&q=link%3Awww.e-consultancy.com&btnG=Search&meta=">link:www.e-consultancy.com</a>) now brings back the same results as for link:econsultancy.com so, again, Google appears to understand they are the same thing and that ‘econsultancy.com’ is now the primary / master domain. </li> <li>PageRank: No change – as above. </li> <li>Other e.g. Site links, Google News, Google Alerts, Images etc.: No change – as above.</li> </ul> <img style="border: 1px solid black; margin-left: 0px; margin-right: 0px;" src="http://farm4.static.flickr.com/3021/3253405612_4e7d1c6a7a_o.jpg" alt="Econsultancy external page links" width="480" height="417" /> So what are we working on now? A number of things including: <ul> <li>Looking at ‘Not found’ 404 errors reported within Webmaster Tools’ “Diagnostics  >  Web crawl” to 301 redirect any pages we can. </li> <li>Updating key links to our new domain – we can’t expect to update all 50,000+ but, for some, e.g. our <a href="http://www.dmoz.org/">dmoz.org</a> listing we’re making the effort. </li> <li>Continuing to get new links for the new site. Though this is mostly done via focusing on content and marketing/PR as opposed to explicit ‘link building’ efforts. The latter includes listings sites and directories (e.g. for our training and events). Also, we’re continue to build out our feeds and distribution (e.g. jobs data to job aggregators). </li> <li>Working on getting images coming through in Google News and Alerts. Not directly an SEO thing, however. More about increasing click throughs – to then get links, to improve SEO indirectly. </li> <li>Doing more PPC to make up for shortfall in natural search traffic. No wonder Google is in no hurry to make the updates... ;) </li> <li>Bits of on page optimisation and internal link optimisation to promote the relevant pages within the site. </li> <li>Reviewing whether to update the current homepage for non-logged in visitors (including Googlebot) to include more dynamic content so it refreshes more often and has more links and keywords on it. Not convinced this will help but worth a try.</li> </ul>   What have we learned? Page/URL changes within a domain seem to be updated pretty fast (within a few weeks) assuming you do the 301 redirects correctly. Not so for domain name changes it would appear. Some people report 4 weeks, some 6, some 90 days, for the latter. We’re at 6 weeks now... The indexation and de-indexation process happened over a matter of weeks too. Webmaster Tools is useful for getting some insight into where Google is up to. However, it’s not clear what time lags there are between what you see in Webmaster Tools and how this translates to the main index. We’re struggling to explain the drop in PageRank for our homepage which has the most inbound links, particularly when PageRank carried across fine in all other instances. Otherwise, we’re playing a waiting game... All that’s now missing is that search traffic. Ask me again in a month whether, in hindsight, we shouldn’t have changed the domain name at all, whatever the brand police might say! (p.s. any useful tips, advice for us going forwards greatly appreciated)

2009-02-04T13:45:18+00:00

html

<img alt="Site Migration and SEO impact" height="100" src="http://farm3.static.flickr.com/2170/2512148775_61fa58b4b3_t.jpg" style="float: left;" width="98" />On 14 December 2008 we relaunched the Econsultancy.com site. This involved a subtle name change (“E-consultancy” became “Econsultancy”), a new logo, a completely new look site with a new directory structure, a new URL, on servers in a different country. We had to migrate 10,000s of pages, deleted a load of old ones, and created 10,000s of new ones. The background to all this is explained in my <a href="http://econsultancy.com/blog/3074-ashley-friedlein-talks-about-the-new-econsultancy-site">interview about the new Econsultancy site</a> – and question 9, about the SEO impact of this large change, is the subject of this post. What has happened to our previously excellent search rankings since the changeover?

<img style="float: left;" src="http://farm3.static.flickr.com/2170/2512148775_61fa58b4b3_t.jpg" alt="Site Migration and SEO impact" width="98" height="100" />On 14 December 2008 we relaunched the Econsultancy.com site. This involved a subtle name change (“E-consultancy” became “Econsultancy”), a new logo, a completely new look site with a new directory structure, a new URL, on servers in a different country. We had to migrate 10,000s of pages, deleted a load of old ones, and created 10,000s of new ones. The background to all this is explained in my <a href="http://econsultancy.com/blog/3074-ashley-friedlein-talks-about-the-new-econsultancy-site">interview about the new Econsultancy site</a> – and question 9, about the SEO impact of this large change, is the subject of this post. What has happened to our previously excellent search rankings since the changeover?

false 3244

<div style=""> <div style=""> Check out Econsultancy's ultra-comprehensive <a href="http://econsultancy.com/reports/search-engine-optimization-seo-best-practice-guide">best practice guide for SEO</a> (300 pages of practical recommendations). There’s also a <a href="http://econsultancy.com/reports/search-engine-marketing-buyer-s-guide-2008">search marketing buyer’s guide</a>, if you need guidance on choosing a search agency. We also have a range of <a href="http://econsultancy.com/reports/search-engine-marketing-seo-digital-marketing-template-files">SEO template files</a> that you can use to steer your projects. All-you-can-eat access to Econsultancy costs less than a dollar a day. </div> </div>

<div style="color: #000000; font-family: Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif; font-size: 10px; background-image: initial; background-repeat: initial; background-attachment: initial; -webkit-background-clip: initial; -webkit-background-origin: initial; background-color: #ffffff; background-position: initial initial; margin: 8px;">   <div style="color: #000000; font-family: Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif; font-size: 10px; background-image: initial; background-repeat: initial; background-attachment: initial; -webkit-background-clip: initial; -webkit-background-origin: initial; background-color: #ffffff; margin: 8px;"> Check out Econsultancy's ultra-comprehensive <a href="http://econsultancy.com/reports/search-engine-optimization-seo-best-practice-guide">best practice guide for SEO</a> (300 pages of practical recommendations). There’s also a <a href="http://econsultancy.com/reports/search-engine-marketing-buyer-s-guide-2008">search marketing buyer’s guide</a>, if you need guidance on choosing a search agency. We also have a range of <a href="http://econsultancy.com/reports/search-engine-marketing-seo-digital-marketing-template-files">SEO template files</a> that you can use to steer your projects. All-you-can-eat access to Econsultancy costs less than a dollar a day. </div>   </div>

Econsultancy Site Migration and SEO Impact - the story so far false

2009-02-04T14:31:00+00:00

econsultancy-site-migration-and-seo-impact-the-story-so-far

2009-04-30T05:38:45+01:00

2009-08-17T15:28:22+01:00

6738