<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<blog-post>
  <author-id type="integer">71176</author-id>
  <blog-comments-count type="integer">2</blog-comments-count>
  <blog-post-status-id type="integer">3</blog-post-status-id>
  <body-format>html</body-format>
  <body-formatted>&lt;p&gt;Now MPs &lt;a href="http://www.bigmouthmedia.com/live/articles/mps-call-on-google-to-review-gambling-ad-policy.asp/5613/"&gt;want Google to reconsider that ban&lt;/a&gt;:&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;blockquote&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;em&gt;This house notes with concern the recent decision of Google to reintroduce online gambling advertisements during a period of economic downturn; supports the Church of England's position that the actions of Google risk normalising gambling in society; and calls on Google to review its policy in line with its own obligations on corporate social responsibility.&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;/blockquote&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Does Google really risk normalizing gambling in society? Does it really have an obligation to ban advertising for gambling as part of '&lt;em&gt;corporate social responsibility&lt;/em&gt;'?&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Hannah Kimuyu, the PPC Director for &lt;a href="http://www.greenlightsearch.com/"&gt;Greenlight&lt;/a&gt;, stated:&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;blockquote&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;em&gt;...I would say that the responsibility lies with the gambling companies themselves. If they are allowed to advertise through other channels such as television; then why not through Google. Google&#8217;s overturn isn&#8217;t a free for all; there are regulations in place including an emphasis on gambleware. Therefore, shouldn&#8217;t the government encourage and assist Google in monitoring the gambling companies, as opposed to calling for a reinstatement of the ban?&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;/blockquote&gt;
&lt;p&gt;She went on to note that Google's move to reinstate gambling ads was clearly a move designed to counteract the effects of the credit crisis and to "&lt;em&gt;fill the hole in its revenue fast&lt;/em&gt;" as advertisers cut spend. Kimuyu estimates that the annual turnover for Google's gambling ads "&lt;em&gt;could easily reach &#163;300m&lt;/em&gt;".&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Which begs the question: isn't that good for the economy? After all, Google does pay taxes.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;And if gambling is legal and advertised through other mediums, it's hard to see why there should be a double standard when it comes to the internet. If MPs are worried about the "&lt;em&gt;normalization&lt;/em&gt;" of gambling in society, perhaps they should consider the possibility that the legality of gambling is what normalized it in the first place?&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Hopefully Google will rebuff these calls for a new ban on gambling ads. As we've pointed out before, even when the ban was in place marketers used clever typos to circumvent the ban and even with a ban on paid search ads, it's not like people are going to have a hard time finding gambling sites via the organic SERPs.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Therefore, in my opinion these MPs are just blowing a lot of smoke.&lt;/p&gt;</body-formatted>
  <body-unformatted>&lt;p&gt;Now MPs &lt;a href="http://www.bigmouthmedia.com/live/articles/mps-call-on-google-to-review-gambling-ad-policy.asp/5613/"&gt;want Google to reconsider that ban&lt;/a&gt;:&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;blockquote&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;em&gt;This house notes with concern the recent decision of Google to reintroduce online gambling advertisements during a period of economic downturn; supports the Church of England's position that the actions of Google risk normalising gambling in society; and calls on Google to review its policy in line with its own obligations on corporate social responsibility.&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;/blockquote&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Does Google really risk normalizing gambling in society? Does it really have an obligation to ban advertising for gambling as part of '&lt;em&gt;corporate social responsibility&lt;/em&gt;'?&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Hannah Kimuyu, the PPC Director for &lt;a href="http://www.greenlightsearch.com/"&gt;Greenlight&lt;/a&gt;, stated:&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;blockquote&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;em&gt;...I would say that the responsibility lies with the gambling companies themselves. If they are allowed to advertise through other channels such as television; then why not through Google. Google&amp;rsquo;s overturn isn&amp;rsquo;t a free for all; there are regulations in place including an emphasis on gambleware. Therefore, shouldn&amp;rsquo;t the government encourage and assist Google in monitoring the gambling companies, as opposed to calling for a reinstatement of the ban?&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;/blockquote&gt;
&lt;p&gt;She went on to note that Google's move to reinstate gambling ads was clearly a move designed to counteract the effects of the credit crisis and to "&lt;em&gt;fill the hole in its revenue fast&lt;/em&gt;" as advertisers cut spend. Kimuyu estimates that the annual turnover for Google's gambling ads "&lt;em&gt;could easily reach &amp;pound;300m&lt;/em&gt;".&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Which begs the question: isn't that good for the economy? After all, Google does pay taxes.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;And if gambling is legal and advertised through other mediums, it's hard to see why there should be a double standard when it comes to the internet. If MPs are worried about the "&lt;em&gt;normalization&lt;/em&gt;" of gambling in society, perhaps they should consider the possibility that the legality of gambling is what normalized it in the first place?&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Hopefully Google will rebuff these calls for a new ban on gambling ads. As we've pointed out before, even when the ban was in place marketers used clever typos to circumvent the ban and even with a ban on paid search ads, it's not like people are going to have a hard time finding gambling sites via the organic SERPs.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Therefore, in my opinion these MPs are just blowing a lot of smoke.&lt;/p&gt;</body-unformatted>
  <created-at type="datetime">2009-02-12T16:23:55+00:00</created-at>
  <enabled-blog-comments-count type="integer">1</enabled-blog-comments-count>
  <expertise-level-id type="integer">1</expertise-level-id>
  <extract-format>html</extract-format>
  <extract-formatted>&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;&lt;img alt="" height="71" src="http://farm1.static.flickr.com/143/327852627_c67190927c_t.jpg" style="margin-left: 5px; margin-right: 5px; float: left;" width="100" /&gt;In June 2007, Google implemented &lt;a href="/blog/1314-google-widens-ban-on-gambling-ads"&gt;a global ban on gambling ads&lt;/a&gt;. But by October of last year &lt;a href="/blog/2867-google-reintroduces-gambling-ads-to-adwords"&gt;it had decided to reverse that ban&lt;/a&gt;, allowing licensed gambling operators in the UK and the European Economic Area to purchase ads in the UK market.&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;At the time, Google claimed that the reversal of the ban was part of a plan to make local search results more relevant.&lt;/p&gt;</extract-formatted>
  <extract-unformatted>&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;&lt;img style="margin-left: 5px; margin-right: 5px; float: left;" src="http://farm1.static.flickr.com/143/327852627_c67190927c_t.jpg" alt="" width="100" height="71" /&gt;In June 2007, Google implemented &lt;a href="/blog/1314-google-widens-ban-on-gambling-ads"&gt;a global ban on gambling ads&lt;/a&gt;. But by October of last year &lt;a href="/blog/2867-google-reintroduces-gambling-ads-to-adwords"&gt;it had decided to reverse that ban&lt;/a&gt;, allowing licensed gambling operators in the UK and the European Economic Area to purchase ads in the UK market.&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;At the time, Google claimed that the reversal of the ban was part of a plan to make local search results more relevant.&lt;/p&gt;</extract-unformatted>
  <featured type="boolean">false</featured>
  <id type="integer">3291</id>
  <learn-more-formatted>&lt;p&gt;For more information about paid search marketing, read our &lt;strong&gt;&lt;a href="http://econsultancy.com/reports/paid-search-marketing-ppc-best-practice-guide"&gt;PPC Best Practice Guide&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/strong&gt;, and our separate buyer's guides for &lt;strong&gt;&lt;a href="http://econsultancy.com/reports/paid-search-agencies-buyers-guide"&gt;Paid Search Agencies&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/strong&gt; and for &lt;strong&gt;&lt;a href="http://econsultancy.com/reports/ppc-bid-management-technology-buyers-guide"&gt;PPC Bid Management Technology&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/strong&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;</learn-more-formatted>
  <learn-more-unformatted>&lt;p&gt;For more information about paid search marketing, read our &lt;strong&gt;&lt;a href="http://econsultancy.com/reports/paid-search-marketing-ppc-best-practice-guide"&gt;PPC Best Practice Guide&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/strong&gt;, and our separate buyer's guides for &lt;strong&gt;&lt;a href="http://econsultancy.com/reports/paid-search-agencies-buyers-guide"&gt;Paid Search Agencies&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/strong&gt; and for &lt;strong&gt;&lt;a href="http://econsultancy.com/reports/ppc-bid-management-technology-buyers-guide"&gt;PPC Bid Management Technology&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/strong&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;</learn-more-unformatted>
  <legacy-article-id type="integer" nil="true"></legacy-article-id>
  <name>MPs call for Google to reinstate ban on gambling ads</name>
  <private type="boolean">false</private>
  <published-at type="datetime">2009-02-12T16:26:15+00:00</published-at>
  <slug>mps-call-for-google-to-reinstate-ban-on-gambling-ads</slug>
  <tweetbacks-updated-at type="datetime">2009-04-30T00:41:31+01:00</tweetbacks-updated-at>
  <unpublished-at type="datetime" nil="true"></unpublished-at>
  <updated-at type="datetime">2009-10-13T10:01:33+01:00</updated-at>
  <views-count type="integer">926</views-count>
</blog-post>
