<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<blog-post>
  <author-id type="integer">71176</author-id>
  <blog-comments-count type="integer">2</blog-comments-count>
  <blog-post-status-id type="integer">3</blog-post-status-id>
  <body-format>html</body-format>
  <body-formatted>&lt;p&gt;There's only one problem: Apple is can't keep up with them and is leaving many of them behind.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;It's being reported that some developers waiting for Apple's approval so that they can offer their iPhone apps in the App Store &lt;a href="http://www.appleinsider.com/articles/09/03/07/would_be_iphone_developers_pulling_their_hair_out_by_the_roots.html"&gt;are being forced to wait months&lt;/a&gt; for that approval. The approval process, at one point, only took days.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Making matters worse, those who are already selling apps through the App Store are finding that Apple &lt;a href="http://arstechnica.com/apple/news/2009/03/apple-has-no-clue-whats-going-on-with-dev-contracts.ars"&gt;is unprepared to renew&lt;/a&gt; their one-year contracts, which are set to expire soon. Apple originally told developers that they'd have the ability to ask for a new contract online within the 90 days preceding expiration. That hasn't happened.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Ars Technica was able to get in touch with an Apple representative, who stated that "&lt;em&gt;This program was not yet in place last year, and Apple needs time.&lt;/em&gt;"&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Huh? If Apple told developers it was going to provide a means for them to ask for a new contract 90 days prior to expiration, it had plenty of time over the past year to get its act together and given how big a hit iPhone apps have been with consumers and developers, you'd think Apple would have decided to deal with the issue sooner than later.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Obviously for whatever reason Apple is ill-prepared to manage its hugely successful iPhone developer program. For a company that has built such a solid reputation that's not exactly inspiring.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;In &lt;a href="http://blogs.zdnet.com/hardware/?p=3756"&gt;a cynical post&lt;/a&gt;, ZDNet's Adrian Kingsley-Hughes writes:&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;blockquote&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;em&gt;iPhone developers are tiny irrelevant&#160;cogs in a massive Apple-branded global 
machine. Developers, along with their applications, can come and go and the 
overall effect on Apple and iPhone sales will be zero.&#160;Exiting developers 
will&#160;be replaced by the applications of the next generation of developers hoping 
to strike it big.&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;/blockquote&gt;
&lt;p&gt;This may be true but companies that treat their stakeholders like irrelevant cogs usually eventually end up with &lt;em&gt;no&lt;/em&gt; stakeholders.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;This applies to Apple and therefore Apple should not take developers for granted.&lt;/strong&gt; If its shoddy handling of its developer program continues and developers find that the hassle of trying to participate outweighs the potential rewards, enough of them &lt;em&gt;will&lt;/em&gt; eventually ditch the iPhone for other pastures, even if they aren't as green.&lt;em&gt; A great brand can only cover for bad service for so long.&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</body-formatted>
  <body-unformatted>&lt;p&gt;There's only one problem: Apple is can't keep up with them and is leaving many of them behind.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;It's being reported that some developers waiting for Apple's approval so that they can offer their iPhone apps in the App Store &lt;a href="http://www.appleinsider.com/articles/09/03/07/would_be_iphone_developers_pulling_their_hair_out_by_the_roots.html"&gt;are being forced to wait months&lt;/a&gt; for that approval. The approval process, at one point, only took days.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Making matters worse, those who are already selling apps through the App Store are finding that Apple &lt;a href="http://arstechnica.com/apple/news/2009/03/apple-has-no-clue-whats-going-on-with-dev-contracts.ars"&gt;is unprepared to renew&lt;/a&gt; their one-year contracts, which are set to expire soon. Apple originally told developers that they'd have the ability to ask for a new contract online within the 90 days preceding expiration. That hasn't happened.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Ars Technica was able to get in touch with an Apple representative, who stated that "&lt;em&gt;This program was not yet in place last year, and Apple needs time.&lt;/em&gt;"&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Huh? If Apple told developers it was going to provide a means for them to ask for a new contract 90 days prior to expiration, it had plenty of time over the past year to get its act together and given how big a hit iPhone apps have been with consumers and developers, you'd think Apple would have decided to deal with the issue sooner than later.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Obviously for whatever reason Apple is ill-prepared to manage its hugely successful iPhone developer program. For a company that has built such a solid reputation that's not exactly inspiring.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;In &lt;a href="http://blogs.zdnet.com/hardware/?p=3756"&gt;a cynical post&lt;/a&gt;, ZDNet's Adrian Kingsley-Hughes writes:&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;blockquote&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;em&gt;iPhone developers are tiny irrelevant&amp;nbsp;cogs in a massive Apple-branded global 
machine. Developers, along with their applications, can come and go and the 
overall effect on Apple and iPhone sales will be zero.&amp;nbsp;Exiting developers 
will&amp;nbsp;be replaced by the applications of the next generation of developers hoping 
to strike it big.&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;/blockquote&gt;
&lt;p&gt;This may be true but companies that treat their stakeholders like irrelevant cogs usually eventually end up with &lt;em&gt;no&lt;/em&gt; stakeholders.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;This applies to Apple and therefore Apple should not take developers for granted.&lt;/strong&gt; If its shoddy handling of its developer program continues and developers find that the hassle of trying to participate outweighs the potential rewards, enough of them &lt;em&gt;will&lt;/em&gt; eventually ditch the iPhone for other pastures, even if they aren't as green.&lt;em&gt; A great brand can only cover for bad service for so long.&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</body-unformatted>
  <created-at type="datetime">2009-03-09T08:01:22+00:00</created-at>
  <enabled-blog-comments-count type="integer">0</enabled-blog-comments-count>
  <expertise-level-id type="integer">1</expertise-level-id>
  <extract-format>html</extract-format>
  <extract-formatted>&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;&lt;img alt="" height="75" src="http://farm3.static.flickr.com/2366/2145881589_8e976beee2_t.jpg" style="margin-left: 5px; margin-right: 5px; float: left;" width="100" /&gt;It seems like everyone wants to develop apps for the iPhone these days. It's not hard to see why.&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Get-rich-quick stories and a plethora of unemployed techies have made the iPhone an appealing target for developers.&lt;/p&gt;</extract-formatted>
  <extract-unformatted>&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;&lt;img style="margin-left: 5px; margin-right: 5px; float: left;" src="http://farm3.static.flickr.com/2366/2145881589_8e976beee2_t.jpg" alt="" width="100" height="75" /&gt;It seems like everyone wants to develop apps for the iPhone these days. It's not hard to see why.&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Get-rich-quick stories and a plethora of unemployed techies have made the iPhone an appealing target for developers.&lt;/p&gt;</extract-unformatted>
  <featured type="boolean">false</featured>
  <id type="integer">3424</id>
  <learn-more-formatted nil="true"></learn-more-formatted>
  <learn-more-unformatted nil="true"></learn-more-unformatted>
  <legacy-article-id type="integer" nil="true"></legacy-article-id>
  <name>Apple leaves developers behind</name>
  <private type="boolean">false</private>
  <published-at type="datetime">2009-03-09T09:00:00+00:00</published-at>
  <slug>apple-leaves-developers-behind</slug>
  <tweetbacks-updated-at type="datetime">2009-04-29T22:14:16+01:00</tweetbacks-updated-at>
  <unpublished-at type="datetime" nil="true"></unpublished-at>
  <updated-at type="datetime">2009-04-29T22:14:16+01:00</updated-at>
  <views-count type="integer">1155</views-count>
</blog-post>
