<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<blog-post>
  <author-id type="integer">27054</author-id>
  <blog-comments-count type="integer">28</blog-comments-count>
  <blog-post-status-id type="integer">1</blog-post-status-id>
  <body-format>html</body-format>
  <body-formatted>&lt;p&gt;What you&#8217;re looking for is a long list of names, which you would then whittle down to a short list of maybe half a dozen possible choices. Remember that there are always going to be trade-offs, which is why some kind of scoring might help you target the right name.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;I have listed these factors in reverse order of importance, with the most important (in my opinion) being at the bottom of the list.&#160;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;I'm also going to try &lt;strong&gt;scoring my shortlist&lt;/strong&gt;, awarding one point for the first point in my list ('A to Z considerations', which isn't a big deal) through to 25 points for the most important factor, found at the bottom of the list. If there's any sense in that I'll release a scoring template as an attachment to this post to help you do the same.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;em&gt;Here we go&#8230;&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;A 25-point checklist for brainstorming brand and domain names&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;ol&gt;
&lt;li&gt;&lt;strong&gt;A to Z considerations&lt;/strong&gt; (in directory / visibility terms, aardvark beats zulu, baby beats yup&#8230;)&lt;/li&gt;
&lt;li&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Don&#8217;t be silly with the placement of the dots&lt;/strong&gt; (that's you I'm talking about, &lt;a href="http://delicious.com"&gt;Delicious&lt;/a&gt;!)&lt;/li&gt;
&lt;li&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Avoid negative connotations&lt;/strong&gt; (depends on the target market of course, but in general this is a good idea...)&lt;/li&gt;
&lt;li&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Punchy or plain weird FTW&lt;/strong&gt; (hey, if you want memorable, why not try something a little off the wall?)&lt;/li&gt;
&lt;li&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Avoid initials / acronyms&lt;/strong&gt; (did anybody ever ask you "WTF does ROTFLOL mean?")&lt;/li&gt;
&lt;li&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Available on social media platforms&lt;/strong&gt; (obviously handy if you can also bag the name on Twitter, Youtube, Digg, etc)&lt;/li&gt;
&lt;li&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Avoid numbers&lt;/strong&gt; (looks cheap, I hate textspeak, and using numbers also leads to spelling questions)&lt;/li&gt;
&lt;li&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Multinational spelling&lt;/strong&gt; (avoid z and s issues, for example&#8230; optimize / optimise)&lt;/li&gt;
&lt;li&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Aesthetics &lt;/strong&gt;(some letter combinations work better than others, as logo designers will no doubt testify)&lt;/li&gt;
&lt;li&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Sound &lt;/strong&gt;(does it roll off the tongue?)&lt;/li&gt;
&lt;li&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Make it easy to pronounce&lt;/strong&gt; (lest you have to spend big to educate people on how to say it&#8230;)&lt;/li&gt;
&lt;li&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Cheap &lt;/strong&gt;(why spend $28,000 on a 'premium domain name' when I can build you a whole business for that amount? There are some exceptions to this rule!)&lt;/li&gt;
&lt;li&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Flexibility &lt;/strong&gt;(it's good to build in a little room for movement, in case your business changes direction)&lt;/li&gt;
&lt;li&gt;&lt;strong&gt;No hyphens &lt;/strong&gt;(we recently lost the hyphen in our brand name, and it caused all kinds of headaches... punctiation is to be avoided)&#160;&lt;/li&gt;
&lt;li&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Singular &lt;/strong&gt;(plurals suck nine big ones, especially when the singular alternative is out there)&lt;/li&gt;
&lt;li&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Target market friendly &lt;/strong&gt;(you must do some research and canvass opinion, lest you get it badly wrong)&lt;/li&gt;
&lt;li&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Synonyms &lt;/strong&gt;(think about related words and phrases associated with your sector, but don&#8217;t get too obscure... you shouldn't need to explain yourself)&lt;/li&gt;
&lt;li&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Keywords &lt;/strong&gt;(if possible it is wise to include at least one strategic keyword; multiple keywords joined together do not always make for the best brand names)&lt;/li&gt;
&lt;li&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Meaningful &lt;/strong&gt;(but not necessarily descriptive! Remember to allow for flexibility. Dallas Carpets, last I heard, was not solely based in Dallas&#8230;)&lt;/li&gt;
&lt;li&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Domain name must match the brand name&lt;/strong&gt; (obvious, no?)&lt;/li&gt;
&lt;li&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Unique &lt;/strong&gt;(easy to track growth and watch your brand go viral via Google etc; avoid trademarks; it's nice to have ownership of a new word / verb etc)&lt;/li&gt;
&lt;li&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Available in .com and other key extensions&lt;/strong&gt; (go for the set! You can do it!)&lt;/li&gt;
&lt;li&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Short &lt;/strong&gt;(up to 67 characters are allowed but at a brand level it is best to stay short, lest people start abbreviating your brand name...)&lt;/li&gt;
&lt;li&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Easy to type&lt;/strong&gt; (reduce guesswork. If anybody asks 'how do you spell that' then you might have failed...)&lt;/li&gt;
&lt;li&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Memorable &lt;/strong&gt;(only time will tell, but aim for something that is immediately memorable. If you forget about it the next day it may not be the best sign!)&lt;/li&gt;
&lt;/ol&gt;
&lt;div&gt;My very favourite domain brainstorming tool is called &lt;a href="http://www.bustaname.com"&gt;BustAName&lt;/a&gt; and is quite wonderful. Do check it out. I also wrote a post last year on &lt;a href="http://econsultancy.com/blog/2482-domain-name-tools-for-brainstormers"&gt;five other domain tools&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/div&gt;
&lt;div&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;/div&gt;
&lt;div&gt;Good luck!&lt;/div&gt;
&lt;div&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;/div&gt;
&lt;div&gt;&lt;em&gt;[image by &lt;a href="http://www.flickr.com/photos/jurvetson/"&gt;jurvetson&lt;/a&gt; via Flickr, all kinds of rights reserved]&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</body-formatted>
  <body-unformatted>&lt;p&gt;What you&amp;rsquo;re looking for is a long list of names, which you would then whittle down to a short list of maybe half a dozen possible choices. Remember that there are always going to be trade-offs, which is why some kind of scoring might help you target the right name.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;I have listed these factors in reverse order of importance, with the most important (in my opinion) being at the bottom of the list.&amp;nbsp;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;I'm also going to try &lt;span style="font-weight: bold;"&gt;scoring my shortlist&lt;/span&gt;, awarding one point for the first point in my list ('A to Z considerations', which isn't a big deal) through to 25 points for the most important factor, found at the bottom of the list. If there's any sense in that I'll release a scoring template as an attachment to this post to help you do the same.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;span style="font-style: italic;"&gt;Here we go&amp;hellip;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;span style="font-weight: bold;"&gt;A 25-point checklist for brainstorming brand and domain names&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;ol&gt;
&lt;li&gt;&lt;span style="font-weight: bold;"&gt;A to Z considerations&lt;/span&gt; (in directory / visibility terms, aardvark beats zulu, baby beats yup&amp;hellip;)&lt;/li&gt;
&lt;li&gt;&lt;span style="font-weight: bold;"&gt;Don&amp;rsquo;t be silly with the placement of the dots&lt;/span&gt; (that's you I'm talking about, &lt;a href="http://delicious.com"&gt;Delicious&lt;/a&gt;!)&lt;/li&gt;
&lt;li&gt;&lt;span style="font-weight: bold;"&gt;Avoid negative connotations&lt;/span&gt; (depends on the target market of course, but in general this is a good idea...)&lt;/li&gt;
&lt;li&gt;&lt;span style="font-weight: bold;"&gt;Punchy or plain weird FTW&lt;/span&gt; (hey, if you want memorable, why not try something a little off the wall?)&lt;/li&gt;
&lt;li&gt;&lt;span style="font-weight: bold;"&gt;Avoid initials / acronyms&lt;/span&gt; (did anybody ever ask you "WTF does ROTFLOL mean?")&lt;/li&gt;
&lt;li&gt;&lt;span style="font-weight: bold;"&gt;Available on social media platforms&lt;/span&gt; (obviously handy if you can also bag the name on Twitter, Youtube, Digg, etc)&lt;/li&gt;
&lt;li&gt;&lt;span style="font-weight: bold;"&gt;Avoid numbers&lt;/span&gt; (looks cheap, I hate textspeak, and using numbers also leads to spelling questions)&lt;/li&gt;
&lt;li&gt;&lt;span style="font-weight: bold;"&gt;Multinational spelling&lt;/span&gt; (avoid z and s issues, for example&amp;hellip; optimize / optimise)&lt;/li&gt;
&lt;li&gt;&lt;span style="font-weight: bold;"&gt;Aesthetics &lt;/span&gt;(some letter combinations work better than others, as logo designers will no doubt testify)&lt;/li&gt;
&lt;li&gt;&lt;span style="font-weight: bold;"&gt;Sound &lt;/span&gt;(does it roll off the tongue?)&lt;/li&gt;
&lt;li&gt;&lt;span style="font-weight: bold;"&gt;Make it easy to pronounce&lt;/span&gt; (lest you have to spend big to educate people on how to say it&amp;hellip;)&lt;/li&gt;
&lt;li&gt;&lt;span style="font-weight: bold;"&gt;Cheap &lt;/span&gt;(why spend $28,000 on a 'premium domain name' when I can build you a whole business for that amount? There are some exceptions to this rule!)&lt;/li&gt;
&lt;li&gt;&lt;span style="font-weight: bold;"&gt;Flexibility &lt;/span&gt;(it's good to build in a little room for movement, in case your business changes direction)&lt;/li&gt;
&lt;li&gt;&lt;span style="font-weight: bold;"&gt;No hyphens &lt;/span&gt;(we recently lost the hyphen in our brand name, and it caused all kinds of headaches... punctiation is to be avoided)&amp;nbsp;&lt;/li&gt;
&lt;li&gt;&lt;span style="font-weight: bold;"&gt;Singular &lt;/span&gt;(plurals suck nine big ones, especially when the singular alternative is out there)&lt;/li&gt;
&lt;li&gt;&lt;span style="font-weight: bold;"&gt;Target market friendly &lt;/span&gt;(you must do some research and canvass opinion, lest you get it badly wrong)&lt;/li&gt;
&lt;li&gt;&lt;span style="font-weight: bold;"&gt;Synonyms &lt;/span&gt;(think about related words and phrases associated with your sector, but don&amp;rsquo;t get too obscure... you shouldn't need to explain yourself)&lt;/li&gt;
&lt;li&gt;&lt;span style="font-weight: bold;"&gt;Keywords &lt;/span&gt;(if possible it is wise to include at least one strategic keyword; multiple keywords joined together do not always make for the best brand names)&lt;/li&gt;
&lt;li&gt;&lt;span style="font-weight: bold;"&gt;Meaningful &lt;/span&gt;(but not necessarily descriptive! Remember to allow for flexibility. Dallas Carpets, last I heard, was not solely based in Dallas&amp;hellip;)&lt;/li&gt;
&lt;li&gt;&lt;span style="font-weight: bold;"&gt;Domain name must match the brand name&lt;/span&gt; (obvious, no?)&lt;/li&gt;
&lt;li&gt;&lt;span style="font-weight: bold;"&gt;Unique &lt;/span&gt;(easy to track growth and watch your brand go viral via Google etc; avoid trademarks; it's nice to have ownership of a new word / verb etc)&lt;/li&gt;
&lt;li&gt;&lt;span style="font-weight: bold;"&gt;Available in .com and other key extensions&lt;/span&gt; (go for the set! You can do it!)&lt;/li&gt;
&lt;li&gt;&lt;span style="font-weight: bold;"&gt;Short &lt;/span&gt;(up to 67 characters are allowed but at a brand level it is best to stay short, lest people start abbreviating your brand name...)&lt;/li&gt;
&lt;li&gt;&lt;span style="font-weight: bold;"&gt;Easy to type&lt;/span&gt; (reduce guesswork. If anybody asks 'how do you spell that' then you might have failed...)&lt;/li&gt;
&lt;li&gt;&lt;span style="font-weight: bold;"&gt;Memorable &lt;/span&gt;(only time will tell, but aim for something that is immediately memorable. If you forget about it the next day it may not be the best sign!)&lt;/li&gt;
&lt;/ol&gt;
&lt;div&gt;My very favourite domain brainstorming tool is called &lt;a href="http://www.bustaname.com"&gt;BustAName&lt;/a&gt; and is quite wonderful. Do check it out. I also wrote a post last year on &lt;a href="http://econsultancy.com/blog/2482-domain-name-tools-for-brainstormers"&gt;five other domain tools&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/div&gt;
&lt;div&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;/div&gt;
&lt;div&gt;Good luck!&lt;/div&gt;
&lt;div&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;/div&gt;
&lt;div&gt;&lt;span style="font-style: italic;"&gt;[image by &lt;a href="http://www.flickr.com/photos/jurvetson/"&gt;jurvetson&lt;/a&gt; via Flickr, all kinds of rights reserved]&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</body-unformatted>
  <created-at type="datetime">2009-05-14T15:38:11+01:00</created-at>
  <enabled-blog-comments-count type="integer">19</enabled-blog-comments-count>
  <expertise-level-id type="integer">1</expertise-level-id>
  <extract-format>html</extract-format>
  <extract-formatted>&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Last night I calculated that I have spent somewhere in the region of three days brainstorming a domain name for a new web venture. It shouldn&#8217;t be this difficult, but it feels like it is something approaching rocket science!&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;img alt="" height="350" src="http://farm3.static.flickr.com/2162/2542450115_6576d19185.jpg?v=0" width="480" /&gt;&lt;strong&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;There are two major reasons for this.&#160;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Firstly, there is a scarcity of &#8216;good&#8217; domain names that are available. This typically reduces all of your obvious / immediate options, and leads you into a world of pain.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Secondly, and even more importantly, the domain name is also the brand name (or should be) and as such there are plenty of other considerations to factor in.&#160;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;So what I&#8217;ve done, partly to restore some sanity to the situation (I&#8217;m still undecided on my final choices) is to create a checklist of factors that should be taken into account.&lt;/p&gt;</extract-formatted>
  <extract-unformatted>&lt;p&gt;&lt;span style="font-weight: bold;"&gt;Last night I calculated that I have spent somewhere in the region of three days brainstorming a domain name for a new web venture. It shouldn&amp;rsquo;t be this difficult, but it feels like it is something approaching rocket science!&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;img src="http://farm3.static.flickr.com/2162/2542450115_6576d19185.jpg?v=0" alt="" width="480" height="350" /&gt;&lt;span style="font-weight: bold;"&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;There are two major reasons for this.&amp;nbsp;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Firstly, there is a scarcity of &amp;lsquo;good&amp;rsquo; domain names that are available. This typically reduces all of your obvious / immediate options, and leads you into a world of pain.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Secondly, and even more importantly, the domain name is also the brand name (or should be) and as such there are plenty of other considerations to factor in.&amp;nbsp;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;So what I&amp;rsquo;ve done, partly to restore some sanity to the situation (I&amp;rsquo;m still undecided on my final choices) is to create a checklist of factors that should be taken into account.&lt;/p&gt;</extract-unformatted>
  <featured type="boolean">false</featured>
  <id type="integer">3821</id>
  <learn-more-formatted>&lt;p&gt;Econsultancy has published a &lt;strong&gt;&lt;a href="http://econsultancy.com/reports/web-project-management-best-practice-guidelines"&gt;Web Project Management Best Practice Guide&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/strong&gt; and &lt;strong&gt;&lt;a href="http://econsultancy.com/reports/template-files-for-web-projects"&gt;Web Project Management Template Files&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/strong&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;</learn-more-formatted>
  <learn-more-unformatted>&lt;p&gt;Econsultancy has published a &lt;strong&gt;&lt;a href="http://econsultancy.com/reports/web-project-management-best-practice-guidelines"&gt;Web Project Management Best Practice Guide&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/strong&gt; and &lt;strong&gt;&lt;a href="http://econsultancy.com/reports/template-files-for-web-projects"&gt;Web Project Management Template Files&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/strong&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;</learn-more-unformatted>
  <legacy-article-id type="integer" nil="true"></legacy-article-id>
  <name>The 25 factors behind brilliant brand / domain names</name>
  <private type="boolean">false</private>
  <published-at type="datetime">2009-05-14T15:41:00+01:00</published-at>
  <slug>the-25-factors-behind-brilliant-brand-domain-names</slug>
  <tweetbacks-updated-at type="datetime">2009-05-31T08:30:34+01:00</tweetbacks-updated-at>
  <unpublished-at type="datetime" nil="true"></unpublished-at>
  <updated-at type="datetime">2009-10-13T10:14:25+01:00</updated-at>
  <views-count type="integer">7873</views-count>
</blog-post>
