1567

html

Some of the findings are unsurprising. Bigger ad placements work better than smaller ads. Video works better than non-video ads. Others are less intuitive. Flash ads have a slightly lower click through rate than static image ads. Video ads from the automotive sector have the highest completion rates – so we like seeing videos of cars. But video ads from media and entertainment companies have the lowest completion rates – so entertainment isn’t especially entertaining. As you’d expect, there are benchmarks aplenty: <ul> <li>Average click-through rate from online advertising across all formats: 0.10%</li> <li>Average click-through rate from static images: 0.11%</li> <li>Best performing ad size: a 240x400 ‘vertical rectangle, which delivers a 0.37% CTR</li> <li>Most responsive industry sector: a dead heat between automotive and health on 0.13%</li> </ul> All good stuff, but this is all US-only data. Yet DoubleClick collects data across the globe, and we know this because it gives a tantalising glimpse of comparative CTRs across twenty markets. (By the way, the CTR on UK online advertising is pretty much the lowest in Europe – so much for our highly advanced digital industry!) So what do we really want from DoubleClick? Three things would make this report essential reading in the UK and really help the industry. Firstly, we need equivalent UK data across this entire set of benchmarks. Not unreasonable, since we are after all the second-most important online advertising market. Secondly I’d like to see a way to cross-reference the different data sources. I want to be able to drill down into a particular sector and look at benchmark CTRs on different ad sizes or at the performance of different rich media formats. And finally I’d love to see some benchmark data on mobile advertising, which is a strange omission from this report. Does all this really matter? Well yes it does. An absence of industry benchmarks makes planning much more difficult. And display advertising is in direct competition for budget with paid search, which, even allowing for the short-comings of the planning tools, offers infinitely more granular forecasts down to keyword level. This week <a href="http://www.guardian.co.uk/media/2009/jun/29/advertising-digital-media">The Guardian quoted Tim Cadogan</a>, the chief executive of Open X, saying that there are around 700 advertisers worldwide who “routinely buy online display advertising”, compared with the 1.5 million companies who buy search keywords. Google’s stated objective is to grow the online display market, and one good place to start would be by applying a firm boot to the fleshy backside of DoubleClick and asking them to deliver a full set of global benchmarks.

Some of the findings are unsurprising. Bigger ad placements work better than smaller ads. Video works better than non-video ads. Others are less intuitive. Flash ads have a slightly lower click through rate than static image ads. Video ads from the automotive sector have the highest completion rates – so we like seeing videos of cars. But video ads from media and entertainment companies have the lowest completion rates – so entertainment isn’t especially entertaining. As you’d expect, there are benchmarks aplenty: <ul> <li>Average click-through rate from online advertising across all formats: 0.10%</li> <li>Average click-through rate from static images: 0.11%</li> <li>Best performing ad size: a 240x400 ‘vertical rectangle, which delivers a 0.37% CTR</li> <li>Most responsive industry sector: a dead heat between automotive and health on 0.13%</li> </ul> All good stuff, but this is all US-only data. Yet DoubleClick collects data across the globe, and we know this because it gives a tantalising glimpse of comparative CTRs across twenty markets. (By the way, the CTR on UK online advertising is pretty much the lowest in Europe – so much for our highly advanced digital industry!) So what do we really want from DoubleClick? Three things would make this report essential reading in the UK and really help the industry. Firstly, we need equivalent UK data across this entire set of benchmarks. Not unreasonable, since we are after all the second-most important online advertising market. Secondly I’d like to see a way to cross-reference the different data sources. I want to be able to drill down into a particular sector and look at benchmark CTRs on different ad sizes or at the performance of different rich media formats. And finally I’d love to see some benchmark data on mobile advertising, which is a strange omission from this report. Does all this really matter? Well yes it does. An absence of industry benchmarks makes planning much more difficult. And display advertising is in direct competition for budget with paid search, which, even allowing for the short-comings of the planning tools, offers infinitely more granular forecasts down to keyword level. This week <a href="http://www.guardian.co.uk/media/2009/jun/29/advertising-digital-media">The Guardian quoted Tim Cadogan</a>, the chief executive of Open X, saying that there are around 700 advertisers worldwide who “routinely buy online display advertising”, compared with the 1.5 million companies who buy search keywords.  Google’s stated objective is to grow the online display market, and one good place to start would be by applying a firm boot to the fleshy backside of DoubleClick and asking them to deliver a full set of global benchmarks.

2009-07-01T12:52:07+01:00

html

Last week DoubleClick launched its <a href="http://www.doubleclick.com/insight/pdfs/dclk_2008benchmarks_0906.pdf">2008 Year in Review Benchmarks</a>, an impressive piece of work looking at the performance of online advertising primarily in the US market. The data was collected throughout 2008 and covers “hundreds of advertisers, thousands of campaigns, and tens of billions of ad impressions.” However, it could have been so much more useful to the UK online advertising industry.

false 4134

Econsultancy has published an <a href="http://econsultancy.com/reports/online-advertising-networks-buyers-guide">Online Advertising Networks Buyer's Guide</a> which contains an examination of this marketplace and profiles of 23 leading networks. We have also produced an <a href="http://econsultancy.com/reports/online-advertising-survey">Online Advertising Survey</a>, based on a survey of advertisers and agencies. For more stats and charts, see also our <a href="http://econsultancy.com/reports/internet-advertising-statistics">Online Advertising Statistics compendium</a>.

DoubleClick's new benchmark report on online advertising is good - but it could have been great false

2009-07-02T12:08:53+01:00

doubleclick-s-new-benchmark-report-on-online-advertising-is-good-but-it-could-have-been-great

2009-10-13T10:22:28+01:00

3379