<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<blog-post>
  <author-id type="integer">4472</author-id>
  <blog-comments-count type="integer">0</blog-comments-count>
  <blog-post-status-id type="integer">3</blog-post-status-id>
  <body-format>econsultancy_xml</body-format>
  <body-formatted>
  &lt;p&gt;It is worth asking why so many affiliates have got a bone to pick with the king of the search engines when many of them have piggy-backed its success so successfully, either via natural or paid search expertise.&lt;/p&gt;
  &lt;p&gt;Well, one of the most obvious gripes is Google's efforts to devalue and demote many affiliate sites down its listings in its attempts to improve the user experience. &lt;/p&gt;
  &lt;p&gt;The assessment of landing page quality in the Quality Score for AdWords has not helped many affiliates especially if sites are not much adding much by way of&#160;valuable content. &lt;/p&gt;
  &lt;p&gt;It is hard to sympthasise with publishers if they are priced out of Paid Search unless they are being discriminated against when providing genuinely useful information, for example by helping users make a more informed purchasing decision through reviews or comparison tables. &lt;/p&gt;
  &lt;p&gt;At the same time, affiliates deserve&#160;a fair&#160;crack of the whip and&#160;there is a perception that regular changes to Google's algorithms and policies, for natural and paid search,&#160;make their&#160;lives unnecessarily difficult. &lt;/p&gt;
  &lt;p&gt;Looking only at the responses of day-job affiliates (excluding part-time affiliates), the&#160;proportion of respondents who believe that Google is&#160;damaging affiliate marketing increases to 47% (compared to 26% who disagree).&lt;/p&gt;
  &lt;p&gt;This breakdown is important because it is these people whose livelihoods are more likely to be on the line. &lt;/p&gt;
  &lt;p&gt;Anti-Google feeling is likely to have been exacerbated by its beta-testing of a Cost-per-Acquisition model, something which Jess Luthi of &lt;a href="http://www.affiliateprogramadvice.com/"&gt;Affiliate Program Advice &lt;/a&gt;believes is a double-edged sword. "&lt;em&gt;Google's move into CPA adds credibility to the industry but the flip-side for affiliates is the increased competition&lt;/em&gt;."&lt;/p&gt;
  &lt;p&gt;It will be fascinating to see what impact Google's adoption of CPA, coupled with&#160;Google Checkout,&#160;has not only on affiliate marketing but also on the whole&#160;e-commerce and digital marketing landscape. Let's see how affiliates respond to this question in a year's time.&lt;/p&gt;
  &lt;p&gt;
    &lt;strong&gt;The &lt;a href="http://econsultancy.com/reports/uk-affiliate-census-report"&gt;UK Affiliate Census&lt;/a&gt;, published in association with Affiliate Program Advice, is free to registered&#160;E-consultancy users. &lt;/strong&gt;
  &lt;/p&gt;
  &lt;p&gt;See also the related Affiliate Census blog post outlining &lt;a href="/blog/742-affiliate-census-lessons-for-merchants"&gt;'Lessons for Merchants'&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;
</body-formatted>
  <body-unformatted>&lt;FormattedContent xmlns="http://www.e-consultancy.com/schema/formattedContent/"&gt;
  &lt;Paragraph&gt;It is worth asking why so many affiliates have got a bone to pick with the king of the search engines when many of them have piggy-backed its success so successfully, either via natural or paid search expertise.&lt;/Paragraph&gt;
  &lt;Paragraph&gt;Well, one of the most obvious gripes is Google's efforts to devalue and demote many affiliate sites down its listings in its attempts to improve the user experience. &lt;/Paragraph&gt;
  &lt;Paragraph&gt;The assessment of landing page quality in the Quality Score for AdWords has not helped many affiliates especially if sites are not much adding much by way of&#160;valuable content. &lt;/Paragraph&gt;
  &lt;Paragraph&gt;It is hard to sympthasise with publishers if they are priced out of Paid Search unless they are being discriminated against when providing genuinely useful information, for example by helping users make a more informed purchasing decision through reviews or comparison tables. &lt;/Paragraph&gt;
  &lt;Paragraph&gt;At the same time, affiliates deserve&#160;a fair&#160;crack of the whip and&#160;there is a perception that regular changes to Google's algorithms and policies, for natural and paid search,&#160;make their&#160;lives unnecessarily difficult. &lt;/Paragraph&gt;
  &lt;Paragraph&gt;Looking only at the responses of day-job affiliates (excluding part-time affiliates), the&#160;proportion of respondents who believe that Google is&#160;damaging affiliate marketing increases to 47% (compared to 26% who disagree).&lt;/Paragraph&gt;
  &lt;Paragraph&gt;This breakdown is important because it is these people whose livelihoods are more likely to be on the line. &lt;/Paragraph&gt;
  &lt;Paragraph&gt;Anti-Google feeling is likely to have been exacerbated by its beta-testing of a Cost-per-Acquisition model, something which Jess Luthi of &lt;Link URL="http://www.affiliateprogramadvice.com/" Window="New"&gt;Affiliate Program Advice &lt;/Link&gt;believes is a double-edged sword. "&lt;Quote&gt;Google's move into CPA adds credibility to the industry but the flip-side for affiliates is the increased competition&lt;/Quote&gt;."&lt;/Paragraph&gt;
  &lt;Paragraph&gt;It will be fascinating to see what impact Google's adoption of CPA, coupled with&#160;Google Checkout,&#160;has not only on affiliate marketing but also on the whole&#160;e-commerce and digital marketing landscape. Let's see how affiliates respond to this question in a year's time.&lt;/Paragraph&gt;
  &lt;Paragraph&gt;
    &lt;Emphasis&gt;The &lt;Link URL="http://econsultancy.com/reports/uk-affiliate-census-report" Window="New"&gt;UK Affiliate Census&lt;/Link&gt;, published in association with Affiliate Program Advice, is free to registered&#160;E-consultancy users. &lt;/Emphasis&gt;
  &lt;/Paragraph&gt;
  &lt;Paragraph&gt;See also the related Affiliate Census blog post outlining &lt;Link URL="/blog/742-affiliate-census-lessons-for-merchants" Window="New"&gt;'Lessons for Merchants'&lt;/Link&gt;.&lt;/Paragraph&gt;
&lt;/FormattedContent&gt;</body-unformatted>
  <created-at type="datetime">2007-01-24T11:34:00+00:00</created-at>
  <enabled-blog-comments-count type="integer">0</enabled-blog-comments-count>
  <expertise-level-id type="integer">1</expertise-level-id>
  <extract-format>econsultancy_xml</extract-format>
  <extract-formatted>
  &lt;p&gt;
    &lt;strong&gt;One of the questions we asked in the &lt;a href="http://econsultancy.com/reports/uk-affiliate-census-report"&gt;UK Affiliate Census&lt;/a&gt;&#160;(published this week) was whether or not respondents believed that 'Google was damaging the affiliate marketing industry'.&lt;/strong&gt;
  &lt;/p&gt;
  &lt;p&gt;
    &lt;strong&gt;A third of affiliates (34%) agreed with this statement compared to 26% who disagreed&lt;/strong&gt;. &lt;/p&gt;
</extract-formatted>
  <extract-unformatted>&lt;FormattedContent xmlns="http://www.e-consultancy.com/schema/formattedContent/"&gt;
  &lt;Paragraph&gt;
    &lt;Emphasis&gt;One of the questions we asked in the &lt;Link URL="http://econsultancy.com/reports/uk-affiliate-census-report" Window="New"&gt;UK Affiliate Census&lt;/Link&gt;&#160;(published this week) was whether or not respondents believed that 'Google was damaging the affiliate marketing industry'.&lt;/Emphasis&gt;
  &lt;/Paragraph&gt;
  &lt;Paragraph&gt;
    &lt;Emphasis&gt;A third of affiliates (34%) agreed with this statement compared to 26% who disagreed&lt;/Emphasis&gt;. &lt;/Paragraph&gt;
&lt;/FormattedContent&gt;</extract-unformatted>
  <featured type="boolean">false</featured>
  <id type="integer">747</id>
  <learn-more-formatted nil="true"></learn-more-formatted>
  <learn-more-unformatted nil="true"></learn-more-unformatted>
  <legacy-article-id type="integer">362533</legacy-article-id>
  <name>Google - friend or foe to affiliates?</name>
  <private type="boolean">false</private>
  <published-at type="datetime">2007-01-24T11:34:00+00:00</published-at>
  <slug>google-friend-or-foe-to-affiliates</slug>
  <tweetbacks-updated-at type="datetime">2009-04-28T22:41:56+01:00</tweetbacks-updated-at>
  <unpublished-at type="datetime" nil="true"></unpublished-at>
  <updated-at type="datetime">2009-04-28T22:41:56+01:00</updated-at>
  <views-count type="integer">177</views-count>
</blog-post>
