<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<blog-post>
  <author-id type="integer">7526</author-id>
  <blog-comments-count type="integer">0</blog-comments-count>
  <blog-post-status-id type="integer">3</blog-post-status-id>
  <body-format>econsultancy_xml</body-format>
  <body-formatted>
  &lt;p&gt;Dick alleged Transcom used the Nominet group to harvest addresses, but Transcom director William Smith &lt;a href="http://www.out-law.com//default.aspx?page=7831"&gt;told Out-Law News&lt;/a&gt; his mailbox, used to send monthly promotions, had been subscribed to the list by Nominet without his permission.&lt;/p&gt;
  &lt;p&gt;Transcom's message, which advertised its own anti-spam services and included an unsubscribe feature, was &lt;a href="http://www.theregister.co.uk/2007/03/02/scotland_spam_victory/"&gt;sent&lt;/a&gt; to around 72,000 people. Smith said the group was configured to send mail directly to recipients and not via its list address, implicating his company.&lt;/p&gt;
  &lt;p&gt;Dick took action under the Privacy and Electronic Communications Regulations 2003, which allow private individuals to sue if they have received damages as a result of a failure to comply with anti-spam regulations.&lt;/p&gt;
  &lt;p&gt;Dick, who is an electronic marketer and non-executive Nominet director, is only the second such individual in the UK to win in such a course of action. He has launched his own &lt;a href="http://www.scotchspam.org.uk/"&gt;website&lt;/a&gt; with anti-spam advice.&lt;/p&gt;
</body-formatted>
  <body-unformatted>&lt;FormattedContent xmlns="http://www.e-consultancy.com/schema/formattedContent/"&gt;
  &lt;Paragraph&gt;Dick alleged Transcom used the Nominet group to harvest addresses, but Transcom director William Smith &lt;Link URL="http://www.out-law.com//default.aspx?page=7831" Window="New"&gt;told Out-Law News&lt;/Link&gt; his mailbox, used to send monthly promotions, had been subscribed to the list by Nominet without his permission.&lt;/Paragraph&gt;
  &lt;Paragraph&gt;Transcom's message, which advertised its own anti-spam services and included an unsubscribe feature, was &lt;Link URL="http://www.theregister.co.uk/2007/03/02/scotland_spam_victory/" Window="New"&gt;sent&lt;/Link&gt; to around 72,000 people. Smith said the group was configured to send mail directly to recipients and not via its list address, implicating his company.&lt;/Paragraph&gt;
  &lt;Paragraph&gt;Dick took action under the Privacy and Electronic Communications Regulations 2003, which allow private individuals to sue if they have received damages as a result of a failure to comply with anti-spam regulations.&lt;/Paragraph&gt;
  &lt;Paragraph&gt;Dick, who is an electronic marketer and non-executive Nominet director, is only the second such individual in the UK to win in such a course of action. He has launched his own &lt;Link URL="http://www.scotchspam.org.uk/" Window="New"&gt;website&lt;/Link&gt; with anti-spam advice.&lt;/Paragraph&gt;
&lt;/FormattedContent&gt;</body-unformatted>
  <created-at type="datetime">2007-03-05T13:56:00+00:00</created-at>
  <enabled-blog-comments-count type="integer">0</enabled-blog-comments-count>
  <expertise-level-id type="integer">1</expertise-level-id>
  <extract-format>econsultancy_xml</extract-format>
  <extract-formatted>
  &lt;p&gt;
    &lt;strong&gt;A Scottish court has ordered an internet service provider to pay &#163;750 plus expenses and interest to a man it "spammed" by sending a single e-mail obtained via a discussion list.&lt;/strong&gt;
  &lt;/p&gt;
  &lt;p&gt;Gordon Dick took Transcom Internet Services to court in Edinburgh after receiving a marketing message apparently via an email group operated by UK domain registry Nominet. Both parties belonged to the group.&lt;/p&gt;
</extract-formatted>
  <extract-unformatted>&lt;FormattedContent xmlns="http://www.e-consultancy.com/schema/formattedContent/"&gt;
  &lt;Paragraph&gt;
    &lt;Emphasis&gt;A Scottish court has ordered an internet service provider to pay &#163;750 plus expenses and interest to a man it "spammed" by sending a single e-mail obtained via a discussion list.&lt;/Emphasis&gt;
  &lt;/Paragraph&gt;
  &lt;Paragraph&gt;Gordon Dick took Transcom Internet Services to court in Edinburgh after receiving a marketing message apparently via an email group operated by UK domain registry Nominet. Both parties belonged to the group.&lt;/Paragraph&gt;
&lt;/FormattedContent&gt;</extract-unformatted>
  <featured type="boolean">false</featured>
  <id type="integer">893</id>
  <learn-more-formatted nil="true"></learn-more-formatted>
  <learn-more-unformatted nil="true"></learn-more-unformatted>
  <legacy-article-id type="integer">362795</legacy-article-id>
  <name>Marketer wins damages for mailing list spam</name>
  <private type="boolean">false</private>
  <published-at type="datetime">2007-03-05T14:03:00+00:00</published-at>
  <slug>marketer-wins-damages-for-mailing-list-spam</slug>
  <tweetbacks-updated-at type="datetime">2009-04-29T23:37:30+01:00</tweetbacks-updated-at>
  <unpublished-at type="datetime" nil="true"></unpublished-at>
  <updated-at type="datetime">2009-04-29T23:37:30+01:00</updated-at>
  <views-count type="integer">607</views-count>
</blog-post>
