Showing posts 11 - 16 of 16
  1. Anthony Sharot

    Search Marketing Director at http://www.marketappeal.co.uk/

    04 September 2008 11:47am

    Anthony Sharot

    I agree that the JavaScript performance is what sets it apart, although it has a few other nice touches too.

    For example, its incognito mode appears to be designed to take the wind out of Microsoft's sails, as that was one of the touted features of the upcoming IE 8.

    Also, it offers better thread isolation, so one tab freezing won't crash the whole browser, is entirely open source and poses one big question:

    Will Google continue to plug FireFox now that Chrome has been launched?

    I'm guessing that they won't, which must be a blow to Firefox's future distribution, even if their PR department claims otherwise.

    Firefox is safe for a while, as Crome doesn't as yet have a single plugin, one of the biggest advantages of Firefox being the dozens of handy plugins, but then, with SEO already revolving around Google, how long will it be before there's tons for Chrome too?

  2. pradeep kumar Bronze

    asst. Manager - Projects at iORB technologies

    05 September 2008 11:22am

    pradeep kumar

     

    On 11:47:48 4 September 2008 Anthonys wrote:

    I agree that the JavaScript performance is what sets it apart, although it has a few other nice touches too.

    For example, its incognito mode appears to be designed to take the wind out of Microsoft's sails, as that was one of the touted features of the upcoming IE 8.

    Also, it offers better thread isolation, so one tab freezing won't crash the whole browser, is entirely open source and poses one big question:

    Will Google continue to plug FireFox now that Chrome has been launched?

    I'm guessing that they won't, which must be a blow to Firefox's future distribution, even if their PR department claims otherwise.

    Firefox is safe for a while, as Crome doesn't as yet have a single plugin, one of the biggest advantages of Firefox being the dozens of handy plugins, but then, with SEO already revolving around Google, how long will it be before there's tons for Chrome too?

    I just tried GChrome. It is pretty good.

  3. johan ingles-le nobel Bronze

    online marketing at strategies

    05 September 2008 14:44pm

    johan ingles-le nobel

    I'm a very heavy web user so any browser that can speed up the web for me with quicker rendering etc gets my vote. That's why I used to use Opera, until I switched to FF because of the fantastic developer addons. I suspect that a reasonable percentage of the open source, developer and add-on making crowd will start making stuff for Chrome, so sooner or later some of the functionality of those great addons will be available with chrome. And also more importantly Google will build it's core services into the chrome UI in such a way as to make it an easier and better experience to browse the web. I reckon 6 months to a year, and by then, if it's still as zippy compared to other browsers as it is now, then I'll almost certainly start using it as my main browser.

     

    I suspect that it'll take a little bit longer than that though to dislodge browsers like IE. Remember, this is just a beta version so exploits and bugs are 100% inevitable. So I don't see IT managers queueing up to make the switch for quite some time yet :)

  4. Richard Barber Silver

    Head of Marketing at moneysavingexpert.com

    08 September 2008 12:23pm

    Richard Barber

    I have switched over because it is quicker and all the good stuff on firefox will be ported in time.

    Most interesting thing for me is that we are showing 1.2% penetration already, which is pretty impressive given that we have a very diverse audience.

    Personally, I don't mind giving data to Google as they make money from making search better, which makes my life better....

    However, what matters is penetration, where will Chrome have got to in 3 months?

    We had an in office sweepstake and the consensus seemed to be around 7%, but given we are already showing 1.2% perhaps that was a bit low.

    Richard

  5. Ashley Friedlein Diamond

    CEO at Econsultancy

    08 September 2008 13:08pm

    Ashley Friedlein

    Since Chrome has launched we've seen 'Safari' go from averaging around 1.5% of users' browsers to over 5% today...

    Of course this site's audience isn't exactly typical but I think that shows how quickly it is being picked up.

    I guess it depends how much Google themselves push the browser (particularly via Google homepage and toolbar) as to how fast it will catch on in more 'consumer' markets.

    Ashley Friedlein
    CEO
    E-consultancy.com

  6. pradeep kumar Bronze

    asst. Manager - Projects at iORB technologies

    09 September 2008 06:12am

    pradeep kumar

    Hi All,

    Try with Apple SAFARI, excellent performance....

    Regards,
    Pradeep

    On 12:23:15 8 September 2008 rbarbs wrote:
    >I have switched over because it is quicker and all the
    >good stuff on firefox will be ported in time.
    >
    >Most interesting thing for me is that we are showing 1.2%
    >penetration already, which is pretty impressive given that
    >we have a very diverse audience.
    >
    >Personally, I don't mind giving data to Google as they
    >make money from making search better, which makes my life
    >better....
    >
    >However, what matters is penetration, where will Chrome
    >have got to in 3 months?
    >
    >We had an in office sweepstake and the consensus seemed to
    >be around 7%, but given we are already showing 1.2%
    >perhaps that was a bit low.
    >
    >Richard

Reply to this thread

Log in to reply to this thread or join Econsultancy for free so you can post to our forums along with other benefits.