<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<forum-post>
  <anonymous type="boolean">false</anonymous>
  <author-id type="integer">29836</author-id>
  <body-format>econsultancy_xml</body-format>
  <body-formatted>Probably one of the most well known open source (free) anti spam applications is Spam Assassin &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;http://spamassassin.apache.org/&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;This program is widely used to power many spam firewalls, so if you want to use a single source for your content checking, this would be a popular choice. The main issue with these types of content filters, is that they tend to all weight different words and phrases with a different &#8220;SPAM&#8221; score. The other issue with this type of filtering is that it is highly configurable, meaning that one person&#8217;s installation might be different from another&#8217;s.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;To counter this, the new buzz word in the spam filtering arena is &#8220;Reputation&#8221;. Reputation is an amalgamation of a number of metrics that include;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&#8226;&#160;&#160;&#160; Volume of complaints&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&#8226;&#160;&#160;&#160; Volume of Hard bounces &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&#8226;&#160;&#160;&#160; Volume of email send&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&#8226;&#160;&#160;&#160; History of IP&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&#8226;&#160;&#160;&#160; Real Time Black List inclusion&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&#8226;&#160;&#160;&#160; Mailing consistency&lt;br /&gt;&#160;&lt;br /&gt;Leaders in this type of monitoring, Return Path&#160; http://www.returnpath.net/&#160;&#160; have recently released a study that in 77% of the time, reputation has the greatest impact in delivery to the inbox, and content only 17%, and if you consider that they are delivery partners for Microsoft, and run the only white list that Microsoft domains use, they are defiantly worth listening to.&lt;br /&gt;This has been borne out by our experience with sending out 45 + million emails per month, and has demonstrated that reputation really does make the most difference when you are trying to optimise delivery. &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Delivery into the inbox is one of the greatest challenges that faces online marketing, and based on the latest DMA metrics of 68% delivery for acquisition and 80% for retention emails, many are not winning the battle.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;My advice would be to work with one of the specialist ESP&#8217;s or delivery consultants, even if you use your own in-house delivery mechanisms, this could pay dividends even in the short term.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;But if this is not what you want for now, the Return Path website is full of advice.&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;</body-formatted>
  <body-unformatted>&lt;FormattedContent xmlns="http://www.e-consultancy.com/schema/formattedContent/"&gt;Probably one of the most well known open source (free) anti spam applications is Spam Assassin &lt;LineBreak /&gt;&lt;LineBreak /&gt;http://spamassassin.apache.org/&lt;LineBreak /&gt;&lt;LineBreak /&gt;This program is widely used to power many spam firewalls, so if you want to use a single source for your content checking, this would be a popular choice. The main issue with these types of content filters, is that they tend to all weight different words and phrases with a different &#8220;SPAM&#8221; score. The other issue with this type of filtering is that it is highly configurable, meaning that one person&#8217;s installation might be different from another&#8217;s.&lt;LineBreak /&gt;&lt;LineBreak /&gt;To counter this, the new buzz word in the spam filtering arena is &#8220;Reputation&#8221;. Reputation is an amalgamation of a number of metrics that include;&lt;LineBreak /&gt;&lt;LineBreak /&gt;&#8226;&#160;&#160;&#160; Volume of complaints&lt;LineBreak /&gt;&lt;LineBreak /&gt;&#8226;&#160;&#160;&#160; Volume of Hard bounces &lt;LineBreak /&gt;&lt;LineBreak /&gt;&#8226;&#160;&#160;&#160; Volume of email send&lt;LineBreak /&gt;&lt;LineBreak /&gt;&#8226;&#160;&#160;&#160; History of IP&lt;LineBreak /&gt;&lt;LineBreak /&gt;&#8226;&#160;&#160;&#160; Real Time Black List inclusion&lt;LineBreak /&gt;&lt;LineBreak /&gt;&#8226;&#160;&#160;&#160; Mailing consistency&lt;LineBreak /&gt;&#160;&lt;LineBreak /&gt;Leaders in this type of monitoring, Return Path&#160; http://www.returnpath.net/&#160;&#160; have recently released a study that in 77% of the time, reputation has the greatest impact in delivery to the inbox, and content only 17%, and if you consider that they are delivery partners for Microsoft, and run the only white list that Microsoft domains use, they are defiantly worth listening to.&lt;LineBreak /&gt;This has been borne out by our experience with sending out 45 + million emails per month, and has demonstrated that reputation really does make the most difference when you are trying to optimise delivery. &lt;LineBreak /&gt;&lt;LineBreak /&gt;Delivery into the inbox is one of the greatest challenges that faces online marketing, and based on the latest DMA metrics of 68% delivery for acquisition and 80% for retention emails, many are not winning the battle.&lt;LineBreak /&gt;&lt;LineBreak /&gt;My advice would be to work with one of the specialist ESP&#8217;s or delivery consultants, even if you use your own in-house delivery mechanisms, this could pay dividends even in the short term.&lt;LineBreak /&gt;&lt;LineBreak /&gt;But if this is not what you want for now, the Return Path website is full of advice.&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&lt;/FormattedContent&gt;</body-unformatted>
  <created-at type="datetime">2008-02-08T11:10:17+00:00</created-at>
  <enabled type="boolean">true</enabled>
  <forum-thread-id type="integer">2651</forum-thread-id>
  <id type="integer">8563</id>
  <legacy-forum-message-id type="integer">109540</legacy-forum-message-id>
  <marked-as-spam type="boolean" nil="true"></marked-as-spam>
  <referrer nil="true"></referrer>
  <updated-at type="datetime">2008-02-08T11:10:17+00:00</updated-at>
  <user-agent nil="true"></user-agent>
  <user-ip nil="true"></user-ip>
</forum-post>
