Microsoft's Strategy for Wireless
Job of the week
Featured threads
- How relevant do links need to be? 14 replies
- Tracking Online Response to Marketing/Communications Activities 8 replies
- Behavioural targeting software 4 replies
- Penalty avoidance on English-speaking foreign sites 5 replies
- 3 way linking - good or bad? 21 replies
Most viewed threads in last month
Most active threads in last month
- Best Practice SEO Guide Jan 2012 1 reply
- eurovarkark 0 replies
- ZNAP 0 replies
- internet marketing consulting service 0 replies
- How to build your audience in social networks? 0 replies

Director at Skywire
20 October 2000 14:37pm
Microsoft have got a lot of things wrong in their recent history of development - they missed the Internet bandwagon and created IE much much later than they should have done, MSN is a poor man's relation to the dominance that AOL have and Windows CE was a terrible competitor to the dominance of Palm - but the one thing that can be said for them is they have the financial muscle to make things happen when they want to, no matter how late they come to the game.
Can the same therefore be said about their wireless strategy? Microsoft were/are very late to joining the wireless market, but are looking to release their own handsets next year and are now beginning to talk sensibly about what their vision is and what they can do.
For all those wanting to see what the Microsoft money-rollercoaster looks like when it hits have a read of Paul Gross' speech transcript from the Chase H&Q Mobile Centricity Conference ( http://www.microsoft.com/msft/speech/grosschaseHQoct2000.htm ).
A fascinating insight into what they are planning... and like all Microsoft products there's a small bug in the title!
Alex
CEO at Econsultancy
21 October 2000 14:42pm
Interesting to hear what Microsoft are up to on the wireless front.
I notice that your company SNAZ operates out of the US as well as the UK and elsewhere. A lot is said about Europe's lead over the US in terms of wireless internet (based largely on our GSM standard advantage) but what is your view on how this will play out in the long term? Are the US really that far behind? What about Japan? Who do you think is going to lead the world?
On 14:37:54 20 October 2000 Alex wrote:
>Microsoft have got a lot of things wrong in their recent
>history of development - they missed the Internet
>bandwagon and created IE much much later than they should
>have done, MSN is a poor man's relation to the dominance
>that AOL have and Windows CE was a terrible competitor to
>the dominance of Palm - but the one thing that can be said
>for them is they have the financial muscle to make things
>happen when they want to, no matter how late they come to
>the game.
>
>Can the same therefore be said about their wireless
>strategy? Microsoft were/are very late to joining the
>wireless market, but are looking to release their own
>handsets next year and are now beginning to talk sensibly
>about what their vision is and what they can do.
>
>For all those wanting to see what the Microsoft
>money-rollercoaster looks like when it hits have a read of
>Paul Gross' speech transcript from the Chase H&Q
>Mobile Centricity Conference (
>http://www.microsoft.com/msft/speech/grosschaseHQoct2000.h-
>tm ).
>
>A fascinating insight into what they are planning... and
>like all Microsoft products there's a small bug in the
>title!
>
>Alex