Google experiments with a Google News social layer

Few search experts doubt that social media will have some impact on the SERPs in the future, but up until now, it hasn't been very clear that search engines like Google and Bing quite know the best way to integrate social content and signals into their algorithms and UIs.

But if several changes spotted in the wild on Google News results are any indication, they're increasing their rates of experimentation.

Malcolm Coles shared the details, and screenshots, on his blog:

Google seems to be experimenting with adding a "Shared by [number]" stat next to Google News results - so you can see how popular each story is on Twitter etc. Here's a screenshot - you can see "Shared by 5+" next to the news source...

In addition to the 'Shared By' data that Google is experimenting with, Coles also spotted a new 'recent updates' box underneath news results, which links to Google Realtime Search results related to the news topic.

Simple? Yes. But simple doesn't mean 'not better'.

Knowing how many people have shared a particular story might be interesting to Google News users, if not useful. And of course, it hints that Google might be looking to incorporate sharing as a ranking signal if it isn't already doing so already.

As it relates to the One of the big problems with Google Realtime Search (and Bing Social Search) is that tweets and status updates aren't immediately likely to be interesting, and most internet users probably aren't going to seek out Realtime Search or Bing Social Search on their own. But a subtle, non-intrusive link to social search results around something that many people converse about on Twitter and Facebook -- the news -- could be a step in the right direction.

Of course, for a search social layer to be really interesting to consumers, both Google and Bing will need to tackle the challenge of relevancy. Bing's partnership with Facebook, which looks to add relevancy by taking advantage of Facebook's social graph, may or may not prove to be the best way to separate the wheat from the chaff. But it's quite clear that Google and Bing are dedicated to adding a social layer to the search experience and that means we can expect to see a lot more experimentation, and a lot more refinement, in the very near future.

Patricio Robles is a tech reporter at Econsultancy. Follow him on Twitter.

Add your own

Reader comments (6)

  1. Alex Conabeare Alex Conabeare Platinum

    Head of Digital and Brand at Citi

    10:02AM on 20th October 2010

    How is Google calculating this 'Shared by' figure? ie retweets, instances of #keyword or other methodology. Then can we all access this tool please?

  2. Avatar-blank-50x50 Adi

    11:09AM on 20th October 2010

    I'd imagine it would be something similar to Tweetmeme.  You can understand Google being reluctant to reveal the algorithm behind it because as soon as they do it'll be gamed left, right and centre.

  3. Avatar-blank-50x50 maneet puri

    2:03PM on 20th October 2010

    Ah I could not understand that how this Google's next experiment with search social layer would be intersting if not useful for Google News Users? And I would also like to know how Google calculates the number of people who have shared a particular information, like Alex?

  4. Avatar-blank-50x50 Stacy

    12:53AM on 21st October 2010

    Interesting feature by Google, it will be interesting to see what the next step they will take in pushing this feature even more.

  5. Avatar-blank-50x50 jinshin

    10:24AM on 21st October 2010

    interesting feature by Google. i want to no how Google see all picture .and com form the rite product buyer and selling need

  6. Avatar-blank-50x50 Breaking news

    9:50PM on 2nd January 2011

    Is it news or not? That is the question.... there is no doubt that there is gold in them there mountains of tweets and status updates. the real question is whether the technology is good enough yet to tell the difference between real gold and fools gold. 

    For anyone who watches strictly come dancing in the UK, you will understand the analogy that public voting is not always about quality.

    in particular any news with an element of celeb, may drown out other news?

Log in to post a comment