Showing posts 1 - 10 of 12
  1. Lawrence L

    Freelance Web Consultant at architxt.net

    14 December 2008 01:23am

    Lawrence L

    Was nice to wake up to a blue sky :)


    My first impression is very positive. I was glad to see your homepage change and not read the quote from the Warner Bros. guy for the 10,000th time.
    The new interface is clearer, easier to navigate and the new homepage (when logged on) is useful. I like how the logo scrolls down - a good reminder of for first time readers.
    I've just updated my profile and think you have done a great job in designing the form. The account section is definitely one of the best I've seen.
    The header bit is elegant but I'm wondering whether it will feature any content of any sort. You've given a lot of space to that sky.
    Improvements?
    Well, apart from seeing more stuff in the header I think you should let some of your padi content free. I don't mean to give away reports but to feature some of the information as (useful) 'bait' on the side, perhaps in a box at the side. No doubt you have tons of market data in your reports you could pick a few stats to show from.
    Also, I'm hoping you will explain the ending on your Whoops. page.
  2. Ashley Friedlein Staff

    CEO at Econsultancy

    14 December 2008 08:43am

    Ashley Friedlein

    Glad to hear you like it. It's still settling down and various bits we need to fix. Like not showing the HTML code in the forum posts!

    BTW, how did you get your Whoops page?

    Ashley

  3. Lawrence L

    Freelance Web Consultant at architxt.net

    14 December 2008 09:25am

    Lawrence L

    I got the Whoops page by clicking on any of the 'most recent reports' links. Eg: http://econsultancy.com/reports/online-transaction-processing-guide


    I'm using the latest version of Chrome. In Firefox 3 the link works.
    Also, I'm getting an error message when trying toadd my sixth job in my profile:
    "Sorry, but we could not submit the form. Please check that you have provided the following details correctly"
    Am I limited to the last 5?
  4. Ashley Friedlein Staff

    CEO at Econsultancy

    14 December 2008 14:19pm

    Ashley Friedlein

    Hi Lawrence

    Hopefully we've now fixed HTML tags showing in these forum posts. And you shouldn't be getting the error when clicking on any of the most recent reports?

    On the jobs - yes, I think we have limited it to 5 but it should be clearer. And actually maybe there should be no limit anyway.

    Ashley

  5. Rosie Sherry

    Community Architect at Schux

    16 December 2008 13:03pm

    Rosie Sherry

    I noticed that the links from the email content updates didn't work.

    Also on the job posts the external links to the companies lead to the wrong place.

    And, if you go http://e-consultancy.co.uk/ it says the site is still under maintenance.

  6. Ashley Friedlein Staff

    CEO at Econsultancy

    16 December 2008 14:35pm

    Ashley Friedlein

    Hi Rosie


    Thanks for testing. On your first point re. email. That, unfortunately was sent from the old site I think (was it still branded in the old look?). We just hadn't killed off the old site enough apparently! The new look alerts should be operational in the coming days.
    On job posts - can you give me an example (I can't find this problem).
    On http://e-consultancy.co.uk/ - good spot. Need to redirect that!
    Ashley
  7. Katie Burke

    Marketing Manager at Welcom Software LLP

    17 December 2008 10:59am

    Katie Burke

    Hi,

    I am I correct in thinking the "also in the forum" section on the homepage lists the details of the poster but when visiting some of the threads they have been posted by 'anonymous'?

    Thanks

    Andy

  8. Ashley Friedlein Staff

    CEO at Econsultancy

    17 December 2008 11:15am

    Ashley Friedlein

    Hi Andy


    Good spot. That's incorrect. If a user posts as anonymous, or has his/her profile set to invisible in the Member Directory, then clearly their details shouldn't show on the homepage like this.
    Ashley
  9. Ignacio Seron

    Sem Specialist at Ecweb

    07 January 2009 15:32pm

    Ignacio Seron

    Dear all,

    I am surprised that I can "see" the pagerank only 3 weeks after the migration.
    Usually you can see pagerank after 2 months approx.

    Also the amount of indexed pages of e-consultancy today is 7,590 and I remember it was over + 20K.so this is a very fast de-indexing

    Then questions:

    • Did you only made 301 redirections?
    • Did you contacted google for the migration process?
    • Google webmasters tools have helped in the migration process? A lot or a little?

    I think this could be a good  case studie about migration preparation, implementation and audit.

    Hope someone from econsultancy answers...
    Regards.
    Ignacio

  10. Ashley Friedlein Staff

    CEO at Econsultancy

    07 January 2009 15:47pm

    Ashley Friedlein

    Hi Ignacio

    On Pagerank:
    Yes, pretty much all the PageRank appears to have transferred almost immediately *at a page level*. However, this is not yet true of the homepage (which is 3 on the new site at the moment but was 5 on the old site). And, at the moment, we reckon our "domain credibility/authority" has taken a knocking so new pages aren't ranking as quickly as they used to. So our 'long tail' traffic is down on search referrals.

    Pages (de)indexed:
    Yes, the number of pages indexed on the old site dropped very quickly from over 40,000 to the current 7,000 or so. So the de-indexation was fast.

    I'm seeing 26,000+ pages of this new site indexed on Google (http://www.google.com/search?rlz=1C1GGLS_en-GBGB291GB303&sourceid=chrome&ie=UTF-8&q=site:econsultancy.com) and more like 60,000 on Yahoo! (http://siteexplorer.search.yahoo.com/search?p=http://econsultancy.com&bwm=p&bwms=p&fr=sfp&fr2=seo-rd-se). So the indexation is happening quite quickly too.

    301 redirects
    Yes, this is pretty much all that we did. Read my answer to question 9 at http://econsultancy.com/blog/3074-ashley-friedlein-talks-about-the-new-econsultancy-site.

    Google / Google Webmaster Tools
    No we didn't contact Google about the migration process. I don't think you can? We did verify our new site with a new verification code in Webmaster Tools. And it does tell us about the new indexation. But it hasn't really helped us with anything yet.

    Overall
    The de-indexation and re-indexation and transfer of PageRank at a page level all seem to have happened very smoothly. However, our search referrals from Google are down at the moment compared to the old site as I imagine Google doesn't yet 'trust' the new domain in the same way it did the old one. We're hoping Google will figure out soon enough that this domain *is* the old one!

    Regards

    Ashley

Reply to this thread

Log in to reply to this thread or join Econsultancy for free so you can post to our forums along with other benefits.