1. Andrew Allfrey

    eTail Optimisation Specialist at Click Funnel Ltd

    10 December 2007 12:55pm

    Andrew Allfrey

    Hi there,

    I'm wondering if anyone can give us an idea on whether it is preferable to have all search optimisation costs totally transparent for a potential client so that when they come onto the website they see exactly what the costs involved are.

    Alternatively are clients happy to request more information from a company with only a rough idea of the likely costs?

    Some search companies seem to offer fixed price projects that they apply to all projects. I'm not convinced by this so am looking to get some feedback here :-)

    Hope that make sense!

    I'd be grateful for any feedback.

    Andrew Allfrey

  2. dan barker

    E-Business Consultant at Dan Barker

    10 December 2007 17:35pm

    dan barker

    hi, Andrew, how are you?

    I'd do a bit of both. eg. you could provide pricing options for audits, reports, etc & leave full projects to be price specced.

    I hope that helps!

    daniel

  3. Arnab Mitra

    Manager-Business Development at Indigo Consulting

    11 December 2007 10:17am

    Arnab Mitra

    Hi Andrew

    I think having fixed price for all the projects is wrong, because that doesn't make any sense for different websites and different keywords.

  4. Jonathan Davey

    Director at LiaiseOnline Limited

    11 December 2007 22:04pm

    Jonathan Davey

    Why not have a starter pack price... which could be zero!

    Then, once they have experience your wisdom you can sound out their position in the evolutionary chain and price accordingly.

    I was with a customer today who reminisced about their first agency job where he proudly took his priced up pitch to the powers that be and was told to stick a nought on the end so not to offend the client!

    Offer a FREE something or other.

Reply to this thread

Log in to reply to this thread or join Econsultancy for free so you can post to our forums along with other benefits.