1. Paul Tinsley

    Creative Director at Agenda Solutions

    18 January 2002 12:35pm

    Paul Tinsley

    These days we're all engineers with more and more people (subliminally?) aware of the importance 'function' plays in the better products of today. We've all had enough 'digital-years' of PCs, mobile phones, PDAs etc. to realise that the 'beauty' of a product is often it's function as much as it's form. Now we're able to sell this functionality 'above-the-line' as an integral part of the experience. I liked this post:

    "Guess what the major selling point of iPod is...organize your tunes by artist, album, genre, etc... It's a $400 device with cutting-edge design, but the thing they seem to think is the biggest selling point is how easily it organizes your songs. It occurred to me that we are, indeed, not just representing a skill set that is for propeller-heads and anal-retentives. If Apple is harping on the IA of an embedded OS in a high-end consumer device, then IA is indeed a very hip, market-essential Thing To Do. "

    http://www.info-arch.org/hypermail/sigia-l/0201/0323.html (via Peterme.com)

  2. David Jarvis Enterprise

    Multichannel Strategy Director at Specialist Holidays Group - TUI Travel

    10 April 2002 11:29am

    David Jarvis

    Look how far we have come? We haven't even started yet! I recently went to an event where Jared Spool presented evidence showing even the best websites (in this case e-bay) only achieved users' goals 40% of the time. That means that 3 of 5 people cannot sucessfully do what they want with *the best* websites.

    Compare that with buying something from a shop - it is unthinkable.

    There are 40 million websites available now, and the growth, although slowing, is still colossal. Probably 90% of these are not worth looking at because they are so ineffective. So there is still much work to do.

    Can anyone in this forum point to work that proves (objectively) significant improvements in design?

    Regards, d

    On 12:35:44 18 January 2002 paul wrote:
    >These days we're all engineers with more and more people
    >(subliminally?) aware of the importance 'function' plays
    >in the better products of today. We've all had enough
    >'digital-years' of PCs, mobile phones, PDAs etc. to
    >realise that the 'beauty' of a product is often it's
    >function as much as it's form. Now we're able to sell this
    >functionality 'above-the-line' as an integral part of the
    >experience. I liked this post:
    >
    >"Guess what the major selling point of iPod
    >is...organize your tunes by artist, album, genre, etc...
    >It's a $400 device with cutting-edge design, but the thing
    >they seem to think is the biggest selling point is how
    >easily it organizes your songs. It occurred to me that we
    >are, indeed, not just representing a skill set that is for
    >propeller-heads and anal-retentives. If Apple is harping
    >on the IA of an embedded OS in a high-end consumer device,
    >then IA is indeed a very hip, market-essential Thing To
    >Do. "
    >
    >http://www.info-arch.org/hypermail/sigia-l/0201/0323.html
    >(via Peterme.com)
    >

  3. Francois Jordaan

    Director of User Experience at Isotoma

    16 April 2002 23:20pm

    Francois Jordaan

    I agree with Jared's assertions at that talk about how far web design still has to go to be considered successful. And I agree with him about the main reason -- the absence of a feedback loop, that teaches designers what was successful and what wasn't.

    >Compare that with buying something from a shop - it is
    >unthinkable.

    But I did find his "buying from a shop" analogy somewhat misleading. Buying from a shop is enormously simplified by familiarity, i.e. having done the same thing thousands of times already. Can you remember how intimidating an experience it was when you were six years old?

    >Can anyone in this forum point to work that proves
    >(objectively) significant improvements in design?

    Hard to say, since as time goes on we also become more and more used to the web, so our reference point moves. Personally, my own experience of on-line shopping is more and more simplified by repeated encounters with certain bits of functionality that are becoming standard.

    But at the same time, as I read recently in another article, the problem is increasing as the number of novice internet users are constantly increasing. Every day, more and more new users are discovering the internet for the first time. And every day, I get more and more out of touch with them. This is a job for... user-testing!

Reply to this thread

Log in to reply to this thread or join Econsultancy for free so you can post to our forums along with other benefits.