Web launch delays blamed on lack of content
Job of the week
Featured threads
- How relevant do links need to be? 14 replies
- Tracking Online Response to Marketing/Communications Activities 8 replies
- Behavioural targeting software 4 replies
- Penalty avoidance on English-speaking foreign sites 5 replies
- 3 way linking - good or bad? 21 replies
Most viewed threads in last month
Most active threads in last month
- Best Practice SEO Guide Jan 2012 1 reply
- hoivistecteme 0 replies
- Allexyzew 0 replies
- nunkidionna 0 replies
- SEO Companies help to ensure that a site is accessible to a search engine 0 replies



Head of Digital Marketing Tranformation at BBC
10 August 2006 17:15pm
This finding doesn't surprise me at all. In my experience, many organisations underestimate the significance of content when planning a website. This can even include websites that are meant to be content-rich!
This survey came from the agency perspective, but the unfortunate truth is that it doesn't get much better post-launch (after the 3 month delay), when the responsibility shifts client-side. Even if the organisation puts effort and investment into initial content, it is not uncommon for there to be little planning or structure for sustained content. Websites then end up with stale content, or too little content, or under resourced content professionals within the organisation who are overworked and undervalued, (and possibly underpaid).
Early 2005, I hosted a roundtable discussion on web content strategy. I remember it being a lively group - very smart and passionate about web content, but at the same time frustrated. A common complaint was how organisations viewed web content as an IT issue, (Dispel the Myth that content strategy is an IT ssue). As a result, web content suffered. Content professionals were chosen for IT skills, rather than marketing or communications ones. Web content wasn't integrated with other messages, nor was it aligned with organisational strategy. Investment was too focused on technical issues. And so forth....
....Today we have a flourishing digital industry, Web 2.0, the rise of user generated content, etc. Investment in the web is increasing, as is the recognition of that web does not equal IT. So, is it possible that organisations still are struggling with how to manage web content and content professionals? And how can we help change this?
none
11 August 2006 04:49am
Makes sense, some insurance boards are so out of date that you wonder if they actually sell insurance at all!
Evan
www.Leads4Insurance.com
Web Marketing Manager at www.venuebirmingham.com
11 August 2006 11:23am
I totally sympathise... I have seen sites delay going live for over 12 months because no one was capable of writing the "about us" page!
In the end I started to just sit down with a senior decision maker and start typing the text on my laptop and say "this is the product details text for the model EX101; just stop me if what I type is wrong in any way" I would ALWAYS make sure that these were billable hours and by the time in the project it came to do this I was so familiar with the companies product range that I could write better content than they ever could!
In EVERY single instance where I have left a company with a perfect, working CMS and also a trained internal member of staff to do the updates I have had to come back in and do the updates myself. No internal staff get given the job as a priority - - they never get any recognition, time or extra pay to do this extra work, so even if they do the first update they never do the second.
I don't mind; I end up getting paid to do the initial consultation, then to implement the CMS, then to train the internal staff how to use the CMS, then to write the launch content and then to come in and use the CMS to author new content!
Companies ALWAYS mistake content creation as a technical task and not as a marketing / online copy writing task; they ALWAYS find it impossible to add new content - and NEVER delete old or out of date content.
And then they wonder why they never sell anything from their site - and why it is at number 337 at Google....
Retired at Retired
11 August 2006 15:11pm
A problem occcurs with projects where a final payment from the client is dependant on final signoff of the site. This can creep up on is and we end up waiting months and months for the final payment - which could be a third or a half of the contract price. This simply because the client hasn't provided the content.
We have come across this so often that our standard terms and conditions allow us to bill the client early for any time spent to date if the project is delayed for more than 30 days because of 'events outside out control'. These 'events' are inevitably you know what.
Bob