Posted 04 February 2010 09:01am by Graham Charlton with 10 comments

39% of UK consumers claim that the marketing emails they receive are less relevant than they were 12 months ago, which suggests that brands need to improve to keep customers engaged.

According to an e-Dialog E-mail Attitudes Report, which surveyed 2,000 UK adults, there is a 34% increase in the number of people who are finding emails irrelevant to them, compared to the 2009 report.

Even of the 13% who didn't feel emails had become less relevant, 17% said this is because they had actively opted out of these emails. 47% of consumers surveyed said the content most relevant to them was special offers, followed by delivery update information (24%).

This suggests that consumers are prepared to take action if they are losing interest in the emails they are receiving. Brands need to respond to this by making it easy to unsubscribe if that's what customers want.

Also, to try and keep customers engaged, providing the option to update preferences and alter things like the frequency of emails they receive is a tactic worth trying. 

Marks & Spencer provides a good example of this with an opt-out page that allows customers to alter the frequency:

'Share this' links in emails

While many emails have a share button, it seems that users rarely use this feature, with the vast majority either not using or not noticing it.

Still, it seems to be a tactic worth trying, as it potentially extends the reach of email marketing campaigns, especially if emails contain compelling content such as special offers.

However, more people forwarded and shared emails than last year also, so the use of this option may increase as consumers become more accustomed to the feature.

Learn more...

Econsultancy's Email Marketing Best Practice Guide is a comprehensive document that will help you understand everything you need to know about this complex channel. It is ideal and recommended reading for either agencies, suppliers or in-house client teams.

Graham Charlton is UK Editor at Econsultancy. Follow him on Twitter or connect via Linkedin

Reader comments (10):

  1. Rory Dixon

    9:45AM on 4th February 2010

    Avatar-blank-50x50

    I think businesses have to look at their actual conversion rates from email marketing; for us, it's in our top three channels for conversion, so we're now looking at how specific email campaigns converted and what elements were used - e.g. copy, graphics - to see how we can build on this in future.

  2. Joshua Geake

    10:19AM on 4th February 2010

    Avatar-blank-50x50

    So many businesses still rely on "Batch and Blast" it's amazing.

    Of course the best email marketing techniques will create highly relevant emails without the customer necessarily noticing how relevant they are.

  3. Boyke ten Broeke

    10:36AM on 4th February 2010

    Avatar-blank-50x50

    I agree with Rory.
    The problem today is that a lot of company's trust in "a succesfull" concept.
    The problem is nowdays that a lot of company's aren't looking at how to improve the clicktrough rate of their newsletters, which call-to-action is better than the other, subjectline testing ect. They just keep on filling the newsletter and hit the send button.

    You'd be suprised how many people who are responsible for e-mail marketing for a company, are actually under-educated when it comes to this subject. I work at a company that is hired by a lot of company's to send, build, research ect. newsletters by e-mail. And every day i notice it over and over again that a lot of people that work for companys and send e-mails to their subscribers actually know very very little about what they are doing and what they Could do if they had the knowledge.

  4. Gary Taylor Bronze

    Business Development Director at MassMedia Studios

    8:01AM on 5th February 2010

    Gary Taylor

    One of the biggest problems for the email channel is most companies lack customer insight in to their database.

    This means they are unable to clearly identify and segment their data to be in a position to deliver relevant content and offers on a one to one basis and tend to opt for the quick fix,  one shoe fits all solution.

    There are several reasons this happens the most common in my experience and one  that has been identified in an earlier post is staffing the other is lack of knowledge.

    Staffing because marketing departments tend to be under resourced and lack the training in what is, a fairly complex channel that uses all the tried and tested direct marketing techniques but within the online environment. 

    Knowledge as there are 100's of companies offering an email solution.

    The bottom line is, relying solely on email as a central channel is a mistake and need to assume a multi-channel dimension, incorporating digital channels - email, SMS, web and mobile - along with the more traditional channels - mail and telephone

     Companies need to be using the right tools for the job by using a solution that is capable of managing multi-channel campaigns.

    This enables companies through the reporting system to achieve a higher level of customer insight  and enable effective targeting to ensure they engage with the customers in the way they want to be contacted and to monitor the email marketing pressure on their base.

    The result is less spam complaints and unsubscribe rates and lead to higher open and click rates, the sale and a happy customer

  5. Rob Grant

    10:06AM on 5th February 2010

    Avatar-blank-50x50

    I find that the key driver for poor email strategy is the fact it is seen as a "free" Media and that sending 1 or 1m emails is the same price - this drives lack of planning, segmentation and relevance in the email execution.  I commonly ask people to consider what they do differently if an email cost them the same as a DM piece to send - The answer is generally the same.  Start with segmenting by need, understanding what makes a customer tick and delivering communications that are relevant, respectful and rewarding.  Invariably it also means that the volume sent is reduced, the timing is customer driven and reponses and ROI are improved.  It seems that with each new media we invent a new way of carrying out our planning when we should start with the customer and develop the right plans to convince them to behave the way which makes most sense to them and profit for the business.

  6. James Bunting Bronze

    Director of Strategy and Research at The Communicator Corporation

    1:47PM on 5th February 2010

    James Bunting

    I think my experiences are similar to those of Rob.  It is almost too easy for people to conduct email marketing campaigns badly and that is what ultimately will be a challenge for the email channel.

    1.  The relatively low cost of sending the message leads to a lack of planning and staretgy, but also means the cost of a bad campaign is minimal to the sender. 

    2.  Becuase ROI from email is remaining high despite the lack of planning, segmentation, relevancy etc the sender is still generating revenue and therefore there is limited need for them to improve.

    3.  Doing email marketing properly takes time to plan, segment, review etc and this is a resurce few marketers have on their hands at the moment.

    4.  There are relatively few good examples of email working really well and a limited knowledge base so senders feel little pressure to improve.

    All of the above will of course change over time and I expect the more success stories that people read about, coupled with the changes in ISP delivery technology are going to help drive more inteligent campaigns which is what the recipient ultimately wants.

    James Bunting
    Follow me on twitter http://twitter.com/JamesKBunting
    www.CommunicatorCorp.com

     

     

  7. Kyle Webs

    10:28PM on 5th February 2010

    Avatar-blank-50x50

    Ugh, I hate getting spammed with stupid newsletters, and other promotional crap from companies.

    Emarketers and telemarketers can SUCK IT! lol

  8. Joe Smith

    7:24AM on 9th February 2010

    Avatar-blank-50x50

    The reason for being less relevant is that they are spamming the content, If the content and the subject are fine enough then the marketers can avoid the spam filter,

  9. Susanne Sassen | Moshi-Toshi E-mailmarketing

    9:52AM on 9th February 2010

    Avatar-blank-50x50

    Relevance for the subscriber is one of the most important things in e-mailmarketing.

    But you dont get relevant content in your e-mailmarketing when you are not segmenting your subscribers in different targetgroups. How do you get people to opt-in AND leave you extra information that you can use for your segmentation:

    Putting the opt-in on the delivery form, people might get 'scared'. Cause they just have filled in theyr adress and back account too. The chance they will opt-in will be several times smaller then when you put it in one of the processmails.

  10. Mike

    10:51AM on 6th March 2010

    Avatar-blank-50x50

    I don't know if I would say it's becoming less relevant, but perhaps that would be true in some niches. Email marketing is a powerful tool when you are really giving value to your customers. However, with so many lists spammed and misused, I guess it's easy to think that email marketing isn't effective. Keeping in touch with your customers/prospects will continue to take a high priority for many businesses, whether that's via email or another method... doesn't really matter.

Enter your comment below

Required
Required will not be published
your name will link to this URL

Please use html to format and preserve whitespace correctly