Posted 11 February 2010 10:22am by Richard Walker with 12 comments

Who would have thought that nearly 40% of online searchers make a purchase after being influenced by an offline channel? You would expect some influence, yes, but that significant?

That’s exactly what the results from a recent iProspect study looking into offline influence on online search behaviour indicate...

But there’s more for digital marketers to digest. Unfashionable offline is effective in its own right, and much of offline is converging with online. For example, more people listen to digital radio on PCs and TVs than on their radios according to OMD Metrics. People watch television with a laptop and mobile to hand. And it cannot be too long before RFID technology in mobiles interacts with electronic billboards and then to the web.

After all, Japanese customers of mobile operator DoCoMo have been using the FeliCa chip in a mobile wallet for years. They pass their mobiles over ticket readers in exactly the same way that Londoners pass their Oyster Cards over underground ticket readers.

It is only a small step from the mobile to the ticket reader, and from the mobile to the billboard. Good reason for digital marketers to get familiar with offline media.

So to the future, as we travel escalators in underground stations, it is likely that electronic posters will interrogate our RFID-enhanced mobiles as we pass by. Permission-enabled of course.

Electronic billboards will display advertisements appropriate to our interests. Retailers will be able to offer variable pricing based on time of day. And mobile operators will be able to generate retailer footfall by advising mobile users of retailer offers nearby.

And the technology? It’s available right now. The missing ingredient is merely the commercial model to make this brave new world a reality.

Back to the offline present, there are obvious synergies between TV and the internet. Although the IAB and PricewaterhouseCoopers state that television advertising spend in 2009 accounted for 21.9% of the total, versus the internet’s 23.5%, that’s not the end of the story.

Television may no longer be the medium of default, but it still returns an average £4.55 sales for every £1 spent. That’s a better average return on investment than for any other medium. Depending on the product, service and audience, knowledge of TV strengths and buying currencies can give the digital marketer serious competitive advantage.

Then, there’s radio. It offers the ability to target locally or nationally and different stations offer definable audiences at specified times. Although most listeners are engaged in activities other than listening, whilst listening, advertisers reach listeners at key “touchpoints.” But the thing to know about radio is that it is shown to be a big multiplier of the effect of other media advertising.

Take print. There are so many publications to appeal to practically every niche and market sector. In the UK, there are over 4,800 business publications, over 3,200 consumer publications and over 1,000 customer publications. And with traditional newspapers as well as free papers, the mass market can be reached easily. Print co-ordinated with online campaigns can boost the online effect massively.

And finally I return to Outdoor. 95% of the UK’s top advertisers use Outdoor. They spend just under £1bn annually. So if you want to target clubbers, bankers or brokers; the young or the old; the fashionable or the scruffy, London Underground offers a captive audience of around three million people a day.

The iProspect study asked users what prompted them to search online for a particular company, product, service or slogan. The results were:

  • Television advertisement: 44%
  • Word of Mouth: 41%
  • Magazine/Newspaper Advertisement: 35%
  • Radio: 23%
  • Billboard: 13%

These figures provide a signpost to digital marketers. They show the importance of knowing the strengths and compatibilities of all channels, buying currencies and means of measurement. Offline needs to be considered as part of any marketing mix.

So to the question, who would have thought that nearly 40% of online searchers make a purchase after being influenced by an offline channel? The answer is top digital marketers.

So let me invite you to join some of them at Econsultancy’s one day course on Offline Marketing Principles - An Introduction on 18th March. In addition to covering the principles of marketing, it will also cover TV, Radio, Print and Outdoor.

Learn more...

Offline Marketing Principles - An Introduction. This intensive course, held on 18th March, shows you why offline can bring significant benefit to online marketing campaigns. This one day course starts with the fundamental principles of marketing. It then focuses on brand management through to the buying currencies for offline media such as TV, Radio, Print and Outdoor.

Richard Walker is a trainer for Econsultancy and director of training at Walkerstone. You can follow him on Twitter and connect via LinkedIn.

Reader comments (12):

  1. Linus Gregoriadis Diamond

    Research Director at Econsultancy

    2:33PM on 11th February 2010

    Linus Gregoriadis

    Hi Richard, great post. It's good to see that companies (sometimes with the help of their agencies) are getting better now at adopting a joined-up approach to marketing, which looks at the bigger picture and things like econometric and attribution modelling to find the right blend between channels.

    Although the Econsultancy / ExactTarget Marketing Budgets 2010 Report suggests a continued shift of budgets from offline to digital media, offline media will continue to be vital to marketers who are trying to build their brands and influence customer behaviour (both online and offline). 

    In the longer term, the divide between online and offline will become increasingly redundant and artificial, but for the time being marketers need to ensure that they understand the full range of marketing channels. Many of the same marketing principles apply but there are plenty of differences as well. 

  2. Sean Gorman

    4:13PM on 11th February 2010

    Avatar-blank-50x50

    Really interesting article. As a specialist recruitment consultancy, we use both offline and online channels. We’re continually analysing the effect of each channel separately and then together. At one end of the scale – online - we look at CVs posted, viewed and time to job fulfilment. We also analyse our offline activities such as networking and how this encourages job seekers to our online localities. It’s a challenge to see what works best and our motivation, like that of most professional recruitment businesses is to achieve superior client satisfaction. Keep these blogs coming!

     

  3. Vishal

    6:06PM on 11th February 2010

    Avatar-blank-50x50

    Fascinating stuff, and a good wake up call for small to medium sized businesses that they should not neglect the benefits of offline advertising.

  4. Miles Bennett

    12:11PM on 12th February 2010

    Avatar-blank-50x50

    Richard,

     

    Great Post!  Interesting to see a reliance on old forms of marketing for localised efforts e.g. local radio and so on.  Think that in the long term this will also shift more online with Google offering local efforts, Twitter now doing local and with Facebook and its groups you can join.  Offline efforts will never fade though.

    I've just written a post about Facebook marketing - Facebook marketing using material from Justin Kistner, and its very much the approach that customer CHOOSES to engage with the brand and the old 'forced marketing - you can't live without this' are gone.  AIDA principals are very much in effect though its just much quickly and very much more multi channelled than ever before.

    Interesting you're talking about using the use of mobiles for payments and advertising.  Think this big brother approach is still a few years off as its going to scare a lot of people (IMHO) however, I don't deny that it is coming. 

     

    Looking forward to catching up soon my friend

     

    Miles

     

  5. Dominic Geary Gold

    Managing Partner at MediaVest Leeds

    3:13PM on 12th February 2010

    Dominic Geary

    Good article Richard, I’m not surprised at the findings though, offline marketing has always influenced online consumer behaviour but the difficult bit is measuring it! Interestingly, we’ve looked at how brand search volumes are closely linked with the level of offline media investment for brands.

     

    However, understanding which element of offline media is driving online behaviour is the challenge as, unfortunately the offline world isn’t as trackable as online. Although, we’ve had some success in isolating offline media channel contribution.

    We’ve done this by implementing a number of on/offline tracking and measurement tools and fusing the data together to get an overview of how all media works together. This enables us to better understand how different multimedia campaigns work and integrate.

     

  6. Mark Logan

    5:22PM on 12th February 2010

    Avatar-blank-50x50

    Thanks for posting this, Richard. The link you provide goes to a study on search and online display media. There's a 2007 study on iProspect's site about offline advertising and search. Is there a more recent study that I'm not seeing?

  7. Richard Walker Bronze

    Director at Walkerstone Limited

    6:28PM on 12th February 2010

    Richard Walker

    Hi Mark, I have gleaned information from a variety of UK and US sources to produce this information and I refer to the iProspect headlines, study data and of course the study itself where relevant. They haven’t updated the original study. However I am contining to collate more data with the intent of writing about the results soon.

  8. Richard Powell Silver

    eCommerce Professional at Freelance (Directrix Digital)

    11:14AM on 14th February 2010

    Richard Powell

    I've seen better online sales from intregrated multi-channel, than single channel campaigns consistently over a few years.

    I don't know the costs of all of the offline components so can't comment on the ROI of multi-channel vs pure online.

  9. Adrian Yearwood Bronze

    New Media Manager at Tottenham Hotspur

    10:10AM on 17th February 2010

    Adrian Yearwood

    Good article Richard, Having worked in environments where offline and online marketing have been run by independent departments it is refreshing to see evidence of the need for them to work together.

    Brands that will achieve the most moving forward are those that fully understand and buy-in to the need to evaluate channels on their own merits and how they interact, contribute and influence the performance of others and the business goals.

    Dare I say a taking a true Multi Channel approach underpinned by attribute modelling to find the right blend.

  10. Sean Barton - e-Commerce - Banking

    4:18PM on 17th February 2010

    Avatar-blank-50x50

    Good article - it's not about offline vs. online but about balance, i.e. driving efficiency through employing budget at the optimum levels. It is quite clear that offline marketing contributes significantly to driving online traffic and subsequently sales - the difficulty has always been measuring what the actual metric effect is...specific web URL's hold a large margin of error in that some people will use search engines to look for the brand and if using the specified URL will invariably type only the primary URL reference to reach the site, ignoring the, e.g.  www.mybrand.co.uk/offer reference. If anyone has any effective methods of more accurately tracking offline to online driven volume then I would love to hear from you.

  11. john

    2:10PM on 9th March 2010

    Avatar-blank-50x50

    I am very much interested and to know more with the one you have mentioned about FeliCa..Please help me here.

  12. john

    1:23PM on 10th March 2010

    Avatar-blank-50x50

    Internet is yet the cheapest way of marketing and advertising.

Enter your comment below

Required
Required will not be published
your name will link to this URL

Please use html to format and preserve whitespace correctly