Google changes its trademark policy (again!)

Google has announced changes to the way in which it deals with trademarks and Google AdWords at a press conference this morning.

In a move which brings the UK in line with its US policy, advertisers will now be able to include trademarked words and phrases in their Google ads without the trademark owners permission.

Since a change back in May 2008, advertisers have been able to bid on trademarked phrases on Google, but until this latest change, use of trademarks within ad text has strictly been with the trademark owner's permission only.

The changes, which come into force on September 14, will see Google wash their hands of the trademark argument, and come soon after winning a high profile legal battle against Louis Vuitton in the EU law courts.

Why has Google made this move?

Im sure Google would argue that it is just bringing the UK in line with its US trademark policy and also that it is in the interest of user experience.

One of the stipulations of being able to include trademarks in ad text is that you must link through to a page about the trademark or product. This effectively means that retailers and resellers will be able to use the trademark, but competitors will not.

Google has perhaps decided, through its US experiences and through the Louis Vuitton case, that it is unlikely to be liable for any cases brought, and it removes a large administrative burden. 

At present, if an advertiser wants to be approved for use of a trademark they must provide an email stating approval, which then has to be processed by Google before their account is white-labelled. This process needs to be managed by Google and once removed, this will free up the staff and technology currently involved.

What can we expect on September 14th?

There will probably a little craziness for a short time, but it will soon sort itself out. I imagine the market will still be policed, just not by Google. Retailers and trademark owners will find new ways of limiting unwanted trademark usage via business relationships and affiliate terms. 

It will probably take a little while for them to develop their stance and enforce it, but things will probably calm down within a month or two. 

How should you prepare for this?

As an trademark owner, have a look around your trademarked terms now and have a look who is appearing on them, have they got content about your trademarked phrase or product? If so, they will be able to include the phrase in their ad text.  

Consider what implications this has to you and whether you want to find other ways to enforce a trademark removal. If they are resellers of your product you can still enforce a ban through this relationship, regardless of Google's stance. If they are an affiliate then you can do this through your affiliate marketing terms and conditions.

As an agency, you need to speak to your clients and agree how you are going to deal with this. In many cases it may not actually impact your click through rate (CTR). If you have a clear URL and prominent positions you may see little change.

If you are acting on behalf of the reseller, then make sure you have a whole host of new ads lined up for submission in September, as it could provide a boost to your performance.


Add your own

Reader comments (12)

  1. Avatar-blank-50x50 Jenni

    11:07AM on 4th August 2010

    About time, Apple not letting their authorised resellers use any Apple terms in their Google Ad text is ridiculous! How can resellers target their ads effectively when they can't use the obvious 'Apple', 'MacBook Pro', 'iPod' etc.?

  2. Rob Mclaughlin Rob Mclaughlin

    European Web Analytics Specialist at Canon Europe

    12:48PM on 4th August 2010

    A good move by Google - both mirrors the US rules and normal advertising practices in general.

  3. John  Readman John Readman Enterprise

    Commercial Director at Search Laboratory

    7:57AM on 5th August 2010

    A great move by Google and one our clients have been hoping for, clients who  retail brands such as Sony, Ferrari or Apple will instantly see an even greater conversion and ROI from their Adwords campaigns. 

  4. Avatar-blank-50x50 Antoine Becaglia

    8:41AM on 5th August 2010

    It was meant to happen. The ever changing rules about trademarks were a joke, confusing and a pain to deal with for advertisers, affiliates, brand managers and agencies.

  5. Ann Stanley Ann Stanley

    Managing Director and consultant at Anicca Digital Solutions

    9:02AM on 5th August 2010

    The Loosers will be>>>

    Many brands will not be happy with competing against resellers - as it will obvously generate more competition and bid inflation!

    The Winners will be>>>>

    Resellers and ecommerce sites everywhere - freedom to advertise products they sell everyday.

    Google - all those extra advertisers and a bidding war for some terms - should see a nice spike in revenue!

  6. Adrian Bold Adrian Bold

    Director at Bold Internet Ltd

    9:49AM on 5th August 2010

    Seems like a logical move 'though suspect there's going to be some conflicts between trademark owners and advertisers when this does go live.

  7. Avatar-blank-50x50 Jenni

    10:20AM on 5th August 2010

    @Ann I'm sure the brands will survive! They can always put a stop to most resellers if they want to, not to mention having bigger budgets for competing (and usually more clicks). Secondly, they aren't really 'losing' when they can set the prices of products anyway.

  8. Samantha Noble Samantha Noble Gold

    Marketing Director at Koozai

    10:47AM on 5th August 2010

    A very good move by Google in my opinion. Many advertisers selling branded products will now be able to target their ad text more accurately which should deliver more traffic to their website and in turn more conversions. The big brands should be happy rather than disappointed by this change as it will mean more sales for them!

  9. Avatar-blank-50x50 Sandis Viksna

    12:37PM on 5th August 2010

    This will be interesting for sure. Also there are some loopholes in some markets. Imagine somebody bidding on a term X, driving traffic to a page on product X and then e.g. selling a different make / cheaper solution.

  10. Avatar-blank-50x50 uk trademark

    1:59PM on 5th August 2010

    its rational move as per my opinion so we can target our product in theirs bracket box..

  11. Anonymous

    3:03PM on 5th August 2010

    interesting that most of the comments are around 'brands' and 'retailers' rather than consumers - what will they gain?  For isntance; how will it be policed that ad linked pages have to be about the product - search any brand term and you'll unearth the dodgy dealers who'll get away with bad avertising as long as possible before they vary it.

  12. Adrian Yearwood Adrian Yearwood

    New Media Manager at Tottenham Hotspur

    4:53PM on 6th August 2010

    I have agree with Jenni - its about time.

    "One stipulation of being able to include trademarks in ad text is that you must link through to a page about the trademark or product."

    This seems fair enough to me.  If a brand want to manage a network of resellers then it should naturally be willing to allow them to use its brand terms. The same goes for other third parties such as affiliates.  Brands wanting their products or services to be available online should embrace the use of their brand by those pushing sales.

Log in to post a comment