1. Darren Hart

    Head of Digital at Think Publishing

    08 February 2010 17:53pm

    Darren Hart

    Hello,

    We're trying to resolve an internal debate on what works best for clients when it comes to putting re-purposed print content online.

    Say, for example, you publish a magazine for a client that has a solid readership (25k per issue) and you wanted to put that content online, to encourage comments/interaction as well as the primary goal of driving more sales for the client on their main website/offline. Would it be best to:

    > keep the magazine brand recognition intact and publish that content as mymagazine.com

    or

    > integrate the content into the existing website as part of myclient.com/opinion

    or

    > try a best of both worlds approach and integrate the magazine brand as a sub section of each site e.g. myclient.com/mymagazine

    I have a feeling that the answer to this is "it depends on the situation" but I'd be interested to hear what you think.

    Cheers,

    Darren

  2. Scott Townsend

    Director at E9

    12 February 2010 06:23am

    Avatar-blank-50x50

    I'd go for the first option personally, then create an online community just surrounding mymagazine.com 

  3. Richard Powell

    eCommerce Professional at Freelance (Directrix Digital)

    12 February 2010 08:09am

    Richard Powell

    SEO will suffer if you publish just as an online magazine, but its much quicker and easier to get an online magazine up and running.

    Has there been any analysis whether the online version would cannibalise print magazine sales? Advertising revenues for print are higher than online. This might be avoided by having the internet version password protected, but would make it harder to generate discussion

  4. Darren Hart

    Head of Digital at Think Publishing

    12 February 2010 16:44pm

    Darren Hart

    Thanks for the answers.

    Richard - in our case it's membership magazines in general so it won't affect sales, but I take your point regarding advertising. The sale factor comes in generating referrals to the main site where users can buy particular services/sign up for membership - much like Econsultancy does. So I suppose you could rephrase the question as if Econsultancy.com produced a membership magazine with different branding what approach would they take out of the one's outlined above.

    A fourth alternative could be via a distributed content network where people want to consume content of that type.

  5. dan barker

    E-Business Consultant at Dan Barker

    13 February 2010 23:28pm

    dan barker

    hi, Darren, how are you?

    I've actually done this - albeit only for one company.

    We did the 'hybrid' first & then moved to a standalone.

    To make it successful, the 'standalone' needed a lot more ongoing work than the hybrid, was harder to sell ads on, and left the paper version feeling a bit pointless.

    For ease, I'd start with the hybrid. The one caveat is - in your case - I'd guess it would be far easier to sell & produce the standalone version, than deal with the ownership wrangles & technical barriers of a hybrid?

    hope something there helps!

    dan

  6. Darren Hart

    Head of Digital at Think Publishing

    16 February 2010 10:01am

    Darren Hart

    Hi Dan,

    Thanks for the info on your project, it definitely seems that the major barrier seems to be the effect on the print version, so I'm definitely getting a little concerned about the effect on that medium.

    Thanks,

    Darren

  7. Robert Easson

    PRODUCT MANAGER at Phaidon Press Ltd

    17 February 2010 13:25pm

    Robert Easson

    Hi Interesting thread. 4th option is to create a clear migration strategy to focus online to grow revenue and readership

    Sounds like there is more you could do with the mag content online to augment and extend value to both advertisers and readership. They may want more than a series of forums or comments threads. Do some market research/focus groups to get a sense of their information requirements online and where you might also support workflow and customer experience.

    Also sounds like you need to leverage offline brand strength to drive sales to commercial services online.

    It sounds like a really interesting project in a similar market to myself.

    Robert

  8. Sean Odell

    Senior Marketing Developer at GilesPatrickson.com

    17 February 2010 19:07pm

    Sean  Odell

    Hi Darren,

    Everyone has some really great thoughts on this subject.  I am getting an either/or kind of vibe for each possibility though.  Let's set the box on fire for just a moment.  You gave three possibilities.  What if you create a two way content funnel that will utilize all resources available for both media types?  If we have a magazine with the 25k readership and a website with the same content origin and essentially being a variation of the same product, why do they have to be independent of each other?  What if they were dependant on each other? 

    Maybe the answer is not to repurpose the same content.  Think of all content as a part one and part two approach.  The magazine could incorporate a combination of 50% complete content articles.

    The magazine could have 25% being part one of a two part article with part two being found on the site.

    The magazine could have the other  25% being part two of a two part article with part one being on the site.

    This would allow each media to drive traffic to the other.  The nice thing is that this would not be done with actual advertising.  This traffic will be interested traffic that is looking for specific information on the other media type.   This could also lead to a larger list of subscribers for both as well.  More subscribers = more revenue.     

  9. Darren Hart

    Head of Digital at Think Publishing

    18 February 2010 10:50am

    Darren Hart

    There's definitely more we can (and will) be doing.

    Robert - I think that's a very sensible approach and one that we will be taking on our future projects in terms of focus groups. I think it's very much dependant on the situation/client so researching client desires and customer base for them is the only way as opposed to a one solution fits all approach.

    Sean - interesting idea, I can see it working in some sectors but not many, it may be too off putting to non web savvy users. I think that if you view the digital platform as a value add - i.e. publish the full article in the offline material, reproduce that online but also add for instance a vodcast of a round table of experts you have quoted in the article, then as long as you mention the value add as a leader in the offline platform then you could be on to a winner.

    Cheers,

    Darren

  10. Tim Akinnusi

    Non-executive director at Glasshouse Consulting

    23 February 2010 12:32pm

    Tim Akinnusi

    Hi Darren,

    I’m afraid there aren’t any hard and fast rules to this one. However, there are some guidelines and logic that can be applied to ensure you get an optimal set of results. For example, understand the audience of the magazine and how they generally enjoy reading content…are they cover to cover readers, or do they pick a specific article to read or are they just light readers. Secondly, I would take into consideration the fact that readers consume content in a very different way online in relation to offline. i.e.. It’s a lot harder to hold a reader interest online than off online, hence the articles published online should be kept concise.

    So in short, keep the same brand as the magazine and be selective about the type of content you place on the website…  

Reply to this thread

Log in to reply to this thread or join Econsultancy for free so you can post to our forums along with other benefits.