E-consultancy: how would you describe us?
Job of the week
Featured threads
- How relevant do links need to be? 14 replies
- Tracking Online Response to Marketing/Communications Activities 8 replies
- Behavioural targeting software 4 replies
- Penalty avoidance on English-speaking foreign sites 5 replies
- 3 way linking - good or bad? 21 replies
Most viewed threads in last month
Most active threads in last month
- Best Practice SEO Guide Jan 2012 1 reply
- VeisseAgite 0 replies
- KeellOrielm 0 replies
- Entry level search function 0 replies
- Introduction 0 replies

CEO at Econsultancy
20 April 2004 14:38pm
We're hoping for some feedback from you to help us with our identity crisis...
Well, not really a crisis, but when we're doing press releases, or when asked for the "elevator pitch", we struggle to find a neat word or phrase to say what we do as a company. Which might be good because we're unique, or might be bad because our proposition is not clear enough.
Our name is part of the problem, of course. We're not actually a consultancy though many people assume we are. We do bring together advice on 'e' things and provide access to people who give advice. And we are a bit like a consultancy which has opened its own internal knowledge resources to the wider world.
We focus on best practice online marketing and e-commerce in the UK. We publish research, run events and do training and bespoke briefings / research. We're also a community and we help matchmake people with common interests through our roundtables and work exchanges.
Here are some of the words we typically use to describe ourselves:
- 'Publisher'. Our business model is essentially a publishing one (subscriptions, events, some services). But this seems to omit the people side of what we do (community, networking, services etc)?
- 'Resource'. We are a resource, but this sounds a bit 'flat' and passive and again misses out the people aspect.
- 'Community' or 'Network'. We are these things but we're also a business information publisher and don't hang our hat on networking in the same way, for example, as Ecademy.
- 'Analysts'. Because of some of our research, guides and reports we sometimes get compared to the likes of Forrester, Datamonitor et al. But again this misses the people aspect.
So any feedback on how you perceive us would be much appreciated. Imagine the beginning of the press release: "E-consultancy, the [xyz company], today announced..."
Thanks
Ashley
Managing Director, Principal Consultant at James Lambert Consulting (UK) Ltd
20 April 2004 16:30pm
On 14:38:41 20 April 2004 Ashley wrote:
>We're hoping for some feedback from you to help us with
>our identity crisis...
>
>Well, not really a crisis, but when we're doing press
>releases, or when asked for the "elevator
>pitch", we struggle to find a neat word or phrase to
>say what we do as a company. Which might be good because
>we're unique, or might be bad because our proposition is
>not clear enough.
>
>Our name is part of the problem, of course. We're not
>actually a consultancy though many people assume we are.
>We do bring together advice on 'e' things and provide
>access to people who give advice. And we are a bit like a
>consultancy which has opened its own internal knowledge
>resources to the wider world.
>
>We focus on best practice online marketing and e-commerce
>in the UK. We publish research, run events and do training
>and bespoke briefings / research. We're also a community
>and we help matchmake people with common interests through
>our roundtables and work exchanges.
>
>Here are some of the words we typically use to describe
>ourselves:
>
>- 'Publisher'. Our business model is essentially a
>publishing one (subscriptions, events, some services). But
>this seems to omit the people side of what we do
>(community, networking, services etc)?
>
>- 'Resource'. We are a resource, but this sounds a bit
>'flat' and passive and again misses out the people aspect.
>
>- 'Community' or 'Network'. We are these things but we're
>also a business information publisher and don't hang our
>hat on networking in the same way, for example, as
>Ecademy.
>
>- 'Analysts'. Because of some of our research, guides and
>reports we sometimes get compared to the likes of
>Forrester, Datamonitor et al. But again this misses the
>people aspect.
>
>So any feedback on how you perceive us would be much
>appreciated. Imagine the beginning of the press release:
>"E-consultancy, the [xyz company], today
>announced..."
>
>Thanks
>
>Ashley
Managing Director, Principal Consultant at James Lambert Consulting (UK) Ltd
20 April 2004 16:37pm
Hello Ashley
How about something like: "E-consultancy, the [online technology community and centre of excellence], today announced..."
I realise it's a bit long, but I was trying to capture the key roles ;->
Marie
On 14:38:41 20 April 2004 Ashley wrote:
>We're hoping for some feedback from you to help us with
>our identity crisis...
>
>Well, not really a crisis, but when we're doing press
>releases, or when asked for the "elevator
>pitch", we struggle to find a neat word or phrase to
>say what we do as a company. Which might be good because
>we're unique, or might be bad because our proposition is
>not clear enough.
>
>Our name is part of the problem, of course. We're not
>actually a consultancy though many people assume we are.
>We do bring together advice on 'e' things and provide
>access to people who give advice. And we are a bit like a
>consultancy which has opened its own internal knowledge
>resources to the wider world.
>
>We focus on best practice online marketing and e-commerce
>in the UK. We publish research, run events and do training
>and bespoke briefings / research. We're also a community
>and we help matchmake people with common interests through
>our roundtables and work exchanges.
>
>Here are some of the words we typically use to describe
>ourselves:
>
>- 'Publisher'. Our business model is essentially a
>publishing one (subscriptions, events, some services). But
>this seems to omit the people side of what we do
>(community, networking, services etc)?
>
>- 'Resource'. We are a resource, but this sounds a bit
>'flat' and passive and again misses out the people aspect.
>
>- 'Community' or 'Network'. We are these things but we're
>also a business information publisher and don't hang our
>hat on networking in the same way, for example, as
>Ecademy.
>
>- 'Analysts'. Because of some of our research, guides and
>reports we sometimes get compared to the likes of
>Forrester, Datamonitor et al. But again this misses the
>people aspect.
>
>So any feedback on how you perceive us would be much
>appreciated. Imagine the beginning of the press release:
>"E-consultancy, the [xyz company], today
>announced..."
>
>Thanks
>
>Ashley
CEO at Econsultancy
20 April 2004 16:48pm
Thanks for the suggestion Marie. Obviously a lot of what we do involves technology but really we focus on the marketing and commercial aspects of doing e-business.
The vast majority of our users are marketing / commercial or operational people as opposed to technologists. Equally, most are at a management level so have responsibilities and interests across various areas.
So 'technology' is something we steer clear of - perhaps wrongly...
'centre of excellence' sounds good but for me it sits in the 'industry association' / 'think tank' bracket. They clearly have their place but for me they conjur up images of big, unwieldy, committee-driven, policy-making, lobbying, inward-looking, ivory towers etc...
Ashley
Technical Director at Box UK
20 April 2004 17:05pm
>So any feedback on how you perceive us would be much
>appreciated. Imagine the beginning of the press release:
>"E-consultancy, the [xyz company], today
>announced..."
As you've already pointed out, you cover such a broad range of topics, that it's going to be extremely difficult to describe your whole range of services in a single phrase (without breaking some serious grammatical rules...).
We have the same problem (we use 'Internet Development and Consultancy', but this doesn't cover 'content management'', one of our biggest products/services...).
I guess you may just have to 'invent' some kind of new-fangled phrase, which doesn't make any sense except to marketeers, maybe something like:
"E-consultancy, the internet business-intelligence company, today announced..."
or
"E-consultancy, the executives e-business center, today announced..."
I guess you're quite similar to an online IOD, providing business facilities, networking opps, events, based on a subscription...
Hmm... maybe you should run a competition...
Managing Director, Principal Consultant at James Lambert Consulting (UK) Ltd
20 April 2004 17:10pm
Good point! (I'm not a techie either by the way, although I was once upon a time)
I agree it's difficult to define what you do in a few punchy words! Hope you get some great suggestions ;->
marie
On 16:48:45 20 April 2004 Ashley wrote:
>Thanks for the suggestion Marie. Obviously a lot of what
>we do involves technology but really we focus on the
>marketing and commercial aspects of doing e-business.
>
>The vast majority of our users are marketing / commercial
>or operational people as opposed to technologists.
>Equally, most are at a management level so have
>responsibilities and interests across various areas.
>
>So 'technology' is something we steer clear of - perhaps
>wrongly...
>
>'centre of excellence' sounds good but for me it sits in
>the 'industry association' / 'think tank' bracket. They
>clearly have their place but for me they conjur up images
>of big, unwieldy, committee-driven, policy-making,
>lobbying, inward-looking, ivory towers etc...
>
>Ashley
CEO at Econsultancy
23 April 2004 07:38am
Thanks for those suggestions Dan. We had an e-mail sent directly which also suggested:
"E-consultancy, the online business network and research company" or
"E-consultancy - online business networking and intelligence".
The "business intelligence" theme seems to come through quite a bit. But then business intelligence ("BI") is a whole other industry in the minds of many (data warehousing etc.).
The IOD comparison you make is interesting as I think this is indeed similar to what we do. They describe themselves as:
"As a worldwide association of members, the Institute of Directors (IoD) provides a professional network that reaches into every corner of the business community."
I don't think they have a short version either and I'm not sure how I'd describe the IOD in the 4 words or less, press release style. They have built their brand enough, however, that perhaps you don't need to say what they do because people just know. I guess we can always aspire to that...
Director at immediate future- social media consultancy
23 April 2004 17:31pm
Hi Ashley
I think the very fact that you are struggling to reduce the wordage indicates that you can't. Sometimes you just have to accept it: you cannot condense your business proposition without resorting to jargon, and that is definitely not the way forward.
If you want to do this for the press, then definitely steer clear of phrases that only marketers might understand. They are open to all sorts of interpretation and are generally hated by journalists.
If you cannot explain your business in one sensible statement then don’t. I can't tell you how often I see ‘XYZ company, the blah blah of the blah blah industry, announces today’…ugh, Put a full explanation at the end of your document, in ‘notes to the editor’ (often referred to as a boilerplate)
There are plenty of organisations that do not go into detailed explanations, because the range of service/products is so vast: Virgin and Microsoft are examples. They let their press releases speak for what they do.
Your service/products are so diverse, that e-consultancy actually means something different depending on who you are and why you use the service. For some it is reports; for others roundtables; and for many it is the community.
Think along the lines of key messages. 4 strong messages you want to communicate to your audience can then be used depending on the content of the release. For example:
“e-consultancy supports your interactive marketing with access to information & advice on online and e-commerce best practice”
You then weave this into a quote or paragraph. Preferably a quote: and preferably a quote by a user/customer. Iterate often and you will begin to get your message across in a more fruitful way. And 4 messages, allow you to tell more of the story too!
So instead of searching for a strapline, use a combination of key messages (tailored to each release) and a boilerplate that offers further information.
Hope that helps.