1. Ashley Friedlein Staff

    CEO at Econsultancy

    17 March 2004 12:04pm

    Ashley Friedlein

    Next week I'm chairing a press briefing for Google which is about their contextual advertising solution - AdSense. Details on this are at https://www.google.co.uk/adsense/faq - essentially it is serving Google AdWords onto sites such that the ad is relevant to the content of the page.

    In theory this is good for site owners (nice and easy to set up, easy to manage, extra revenue etc.), good for site users (relevant and useful links) and good for advertisers (relevant traffic). And, of course, its good for Google as there's more inventory to sell where search volumes are running thin.

    However, I'm there as the "independent view" bod to encourage discussion and debate. So I'm interested in hearing your views of Google AdSense - have you used it (as a site owner or advertiser or agency...)? Has it worked for you / your client? Have you evaluated it and decided against it and, if so, why?

    The usual sorts of issues / questions that we hear are:

    For a Publisher / Site Owner:
    # What are the brand considerations in taking these Google text ads onto your site? How do ensure you only get the right kinds of ads? How do you block competitors etc.?

    # What's the ROI? Are you better off taking AdSense ads than other forms of advertising? Or is it just a supplementary source of revenue that you "might as well do"

    # Commercial arrangements: when and how do I get paid? Are there any exclusivity terms on taking AdSense?

    For an Advertiser:
    # What's the ROI on AdSense versus AdWords? (you can't bid separately for the two) Are search-referred clicks more likely to convert than content/browse referred ones?

    # Is there any brand benefit to AdSense ads? Perhaps you don't get as many clicks but if you appear against relevant content on a leading publisher's site you benefit indirectly (or later)? On the flip side, can you control the sites on which your ad will appear?

    Any feedback here most welcome. I'll report back on what I learn.

    Ashley

  2. Mike Grehan Bronze

    Vice President, Global Content Director at Incisive Media

    17 March 2004 13:26pm

    Avatar-blank-50x50

    Ashley,

    Just a quick "drop in" to give you a few things to mull
    over.

    First of all, we tend to lump contextual advertising in
    with search marketing and that's really not the case.
    Yes, the contextual ads are served up by a search
    engine, but they appear on pages which are being
    "browsed".

    So the casual surfer who comes across a contextual ad
    may not have the same intent as that of someone using a
    search engine for a purchasing mission.

    This means the return on investment is likely to be
    marginally lower than that which would conceivably be
    returned from an AdWords campaign, for instance.

    In order to be able to write about AdSense myself, I
    felt compelled to set up an account and test it on one
    of my own sites. And just as you mentioned, after
    pasting in the code and uploading the page, sure enough
    a list of my competitors turned up at the top of the
    page.

    Another interesting thing occurred too. I tested each of
    the links to make sure they were working, as I'm
    presuming all publishers would do. Then, following my
    little experiment, I downloaded the page and replaced it
    with the original (without my competitors ads). Here
    comes the interesting bit: Four weeks later I received a
    cheque from Google in New York, for $1.94 !!

    Now I'm sure it cost more to mail the cheque to me than
    the value of the cheque itself. And some poor competitor
    of mine was party to that little waste. After all, I was
    simply experimenting, testing and then deleting. But it
    made me wonder just how many thousands of cheques there
    are floating around for a buck and half, most of which
    (certainly in the UK) can't be cashed/deposited without
    a fee greater than the amount of the cheque itself.

    So, that's purely an observational thing with a little
    ironic humour attached to it.

    On a more serious level, and strictly from a marketing
    point of view, AdSense and other contextual
    programmes(although potentially very exciting) are still
    technically challenged and slightly flawed as a
    promotional tool.

    In classical marketing, a persuasion matrix is created
    to define source, message and channel factors. And also
    to provide some control over variables such as message
    presentation, attention, comprehension as well as having
    an understanding about behaviour. Almost all of these
    factors and variables become victim to external forces
    over which the marketer has little or no control.

    Apart from the initial problem of conflicting objectives
    between the advertiser and the publisher, even the basic
    presentation of where your ad will appear on a page is
    out of your control. And even though your ad may be in
    context with the subject matter of the page, if your
    creative execution is out of context i.e. a humorous
    appeal Vs page body copy of a very serious or emotional
    nature, then once again you have conflicting approaches

    And in just the same way as certain exclusive items are
    selectively promoted and distributed in conventional
    marketing, the contextual advertiser has little or no
    control over where his ad is appearing. In short: You
    may not want your exclusive products promoted on
    somebody's home made and very crappy web pages.

    These are just a few observations and hopefully some
    food for thought when you have your Google meeting. But
    please don't think for one second that I'm writing off
    contextual advertising. It most certainly has it's place
    in the new promotional mix. It just needs to mature a
    little for the marketers mind - before it truly is in
    marketing context ;)

    Cheers!

    Mike.

  3. Tracy Rohan

    Director - Focalpoint at Web Development and Marketing

    18 March 2004 09:45am

    Avatar-blank-50x50

    Great article on marketing relevancy. Quick question, what do you mean by "Then, following my
    little experiment, I downloaded the page and replaced it
    with the original (without my competitors ads). " Just wondering what is meant here. Thanks, Tracy

  4. Mike Grehan Bronze

    Vice President, Global Content Director at Incisive Media

    18 March 2004 11:27am

    Avatar-blank-50x50

    On 09:45:10 18 March 2004 trohan wrote:
    >Great article on marketing relevancy. Quick question,
    >what do you mean by "Then, following my
    >little experiment, I downloaded the page and replaced it
    >with the original (without my competitors ads). "
    >Just wondering what is meant here. Thanks, Tracy

    Tracy,

    I simply meant that, after my little experiment, I deleted the index page with the AdSense code in it and replaced it with the original index page without the code. No AdSense... no competitor ads!

    Cheers!

    Mike.

  5. Brendon Scott

    Senior SEO at Weboptimiser

    18 March 2004 12:20pm

    Brendon Scott

    Ashley,

    I'll have a pop at some of these.

    ># What are the brand considerations in taking these Google
    >text ads onto your site?

    Anecdotal evidence suggests that the impact is limited, but positive. The experience of several large sites shows that when AdSense first appears on a site, the click through rate (CTR) tends to be relatively high initially, then tails off to some extent over a period of around a week as regular users get used to seeing the ads, and tune them out to some extent. Still, the association with Google, however minor can hardly be negative

    Google have messed around with the formatting, and especially (even infamously) the "white space" of unfilled inventory. For a brief period (about 24 hours in Aug '03), any unfilled ad spaces carried a "humourous" message, "this blank space brought to you by Google". Following an outcry amongst AdSense publishers, the "cute" message was hastily withdrawn, and a veil of decency drawn over the whole sorry episode.

    The issue of "brand piracy" ws one of the central complaints of AdSense publishers, so they are definitely sensitive to it

    > How do ensure you only get the
    >right kinds of ads?

    Understand how AdSense chooses which ads to display. Some fairly simple testing has demonstrated that the AdSense spider that comes to spider your pages when a new instance of the code is detected pays a lot of attention to where your OUTBOUND links are pointing, and what anchor text they use. On page content plays its part also.

    For instance, if you operated a widget forum, and wanted to display complementary grommit ads, you caould add links out to leading grommit sites to the page templates of your site. This is a fairly simplistic analysis, but a fairly short period of experimentation should enable anyone to "tweak" their displayed content

    >> How do you block competitors etc.?

    AdSense supports a "filter URLs" feature that permits you to specify up to 200 URLs that you don't wish to display ads for. If you are an AdWords user, remember to add your own URL to this list. Also, in some cases you will need to specify both the www.competitor.com, and competitor.com froms of your competirtors URLs to completely remove their ads.

    The details are easily found in the AdSense FAQ

    ># What's the ROI? Are you better off taking AdSense ads
    >than other forms of advertising?

    *shrug* Experiences vary across industries, and sites. I know some people who are doing very well indeed using AdSense, rather than their previous ad provider, and others who have given up on the program. It is instuctive to note that when AdSense first appeared, Commision Junction (one of the largest affiliate networks) experienced a 30% drop in revenues, as many affiliates swapped out under performing merchants for contextual advertising.

    It's all a bit "suck it and see"

    >Or is it just a
    >supplementary source of revenue that you "might as
    >well do"

    There are several people making a nice living out of AdSense, including a few who had never previously monetised their site in any meaningful way

    ># Commercial arrangements: when and how do I get paid?

    Payments are by USD cheque, approx 30 days after the end of any calendar month where your account had over $100. If you are not in the US or UK, you might wait a while longer (although the international situation seems to be improving over time), and if you earn over $10k / month (you'd be surprised how many do), you will need your cheque to be countersigned, which takes a while longer, but they will FedEx it to you (also if you experience problems with yopur "normal" postal service, and complain)

    > Are
    >there any exclusivity terms on taking AdSense?

    Yup. You cannot display AdSense simultaneously with other contextual ad products, but if you use a provider rotation script, you could display from a selection of AdSense, AdSonar (Overture chosen contextual ads vehicle, in partnership with Quigo), or use the "Alternative ads" feature (covered in the AdSense FAQ), which allows you specify an ad product, adserver etc to be drawn on in the event that AdSense is unavailable for some reason (server maintenance / outage etc)

    ># What's the ROI on AdSense versus AdWords? (you can't bid
    >separately for the two) Are search-referred clicks more
    >likely to convert than content/browse referred ones?

    You can choose to exclude your AdWords from the AdSense program on a campaign by campaign basis, as well as defining inclusion on Googles search partner sites (AOL etc)

    ROI is trickier, it varies a lot. In general AdSense displayed ads get a lower CTR than search destination displayed ads, but may well convert better, due to better targetting. again, experiences vary enormously across indutries, and within industries

    ># Is there any brand benefit to AdSense ads?

    Maybe. Its got to be better having the "provided by Google" flash rather than a general banner ad in a space, but how many users really take notice?

    >Perhaps you
    >don't get as many clicks but if you appear against
    >relevant content on a leading publisher's site you benefit
    >indirectly (or later)?

    Benefits tend to be immediate. If your ad catches someones eye, they click. If it doesn't they never even know you were there

    >On the flip side, can you control
    >the sites on which your ad will appear?

    To a very limited extent. You can specify which campaigns will appear on AdSense, but not restrict your AdSense exposure by language or territory. You could contact specific sites that could / do show your ads, and ask them to exclude you.

  6. Dave Chaffey Silver

    Digital Marketing Consultant, Trainer, Author and Speaker at SmartInsights.com

    20 March 2004 05:09am

    Dave Chaffey

    Ashley - I recall this great test of AdSense relative to Adwords -

    http://www.webmasterworld.com/forum89/1125.htm

    It shows that it can work well - AdSense gave greatly increased reach relative to Adwords, but as you would expect, a much lower clicktrhough rate. Quality was similar in this example.

    Dave Chaffey
    www.marketing-online.co.uk

    On 12:04:07 17 March 2004 Ashley wrote:
    >Next week I'm chairing a press briefing for Google which
    >is about their contextual advertising solution - AdSense.
    >Details on this are at https://www.google.co.uk/adsense/fa-
    >q - essentially it is serving Google AdWords onto sites
    >such that the ad is relevant to the content of the page.
    >
    >In theory this is good for site owners (nice and easy to
    >set up, easy to manage, extra revenue etc.), good for site
    >users (relevant and useful links) and good for advertisers
    >(relevant traffic). And, of course, its good for Google as
    >there's more inventory to sell where search volumes are
    >running thin.
    >
    >However, I'm there as the "independent view" bod
    >to encourage discussion and debate. So I'm interested in
    >hearing your views of Google AdSense - have you used it
    >(as a site owner or advertiser or agency...)? Has it
    >worked for you / your client? Have you evaluated it and
    >decided against it and, if so, why?
    >
    >The usual sorts of issues / questions that we hear are:
    >
    >For a Publisher / Site Owner:
    ># What are the brand considerations in taking these Google
    >text ads onto your site? How do ensure you only get the
    >right kinds of ads? How do you block competitors etc.?
    >
    ># What's the ROI? Are you better off taking AdSense ads
    >than other forms of advertising? Or is it just a
    >supplementary source of revenue that you "might as
    >well do"
    >
    ># Commercial arrangements: when and how do I get paid? Are
    >there any exclusivity terms on taking AdSense?
    >
    >For an Advertiser:
    ># What's the ROI on AdSense versus AdWords? (you can't bid
    >separately for the two) Are search-referred clicks more
    >likely to convert than content/browse referred ones?
    >
    ># Is there any brand benefit to AdSense ads? Perhaps you
    >don't get as many clicks but if you appear against
    >relevant content on a leading publisher's site you benefit
    >indirectly (or later)? On the flip side, can you control
    >the sites on which your ad will appear?
    >
    >Any feedback here most welcome. I'll report back on what I
    >learn.
    >
    >Ashley

Reply to this thread

Log in to reply to this thread or join Econsultancy for free so you can post to our forums along with other benefits.