Guideline Dogma...
Featured threads
- How relevant do links need to be? 13 replies
- Tracking Online Response to Marketing/Communications Activities 3 replies
- Behavioural targeting software 4 replies
- Penalty avoidance on English-speaking foreign sites 5 replies
- 3 way linking - good or bad? 21 replies
Most viewed threads in last month
Most active threads in last month
- Recommendations for email signature management tools? 3 replies
- Methodology for target audience analysis 1 reply
- Travel Partner 1 reply
- In-store tablets 0 replies
- Job Opportunities 0 replies



Creative Director at Agenda Solutions
22 February 2001 13:07pm
Remember when it was ‘fact’ that nothing should be further than 3 clicks away - fine for a while, but then how did we square that with 7 plus/minus 2? We could only go three levels deep but mustn’t have more than 7 (or was it 5, or 9?) links in the nav bar - Guideline dogma as it’s called in a good article on usability fundamentalism at http://www.system-concepts.com/articles/smartypants.html .
For interface designers (of all disciplines) who have found ourselves hurtling by necessity towards User Centred Design its a good lesson in healthy scepticism, humility and the need for iterative design processes. After all if usability is a science then there are no facts, a concept seemingly lost on self-styled gurus:
"What are facts but compromises? A fact merely marks the point where we have agreed to let investigation cease." Anonymous