1. Alex Tonello

    DLG

    22 October 2008 10:55am

    Alex Tonello

    Would you select internet marketing applications that deliver solely high volume of new customers (cost-effectively) or would you invest resources in lifetime value analysis for customer acquisition? Why?

    (Assuming I am an online retailer with an average online sale of £ 100)

  2. Stuart Fawcett

    OSS architect at hSo

    23 October 2008 10:37am

    Stuart Fawcett

    I'd clearly initially focus on the high volume aproach as my end user market would perhaps only make this type purchase every year or two.

    "Some Money now is othen worth more than potentially more money later"

    What i then need is something to keep  them as a customer in the interim, ideally a recurring rental component, or a supplies item for the £100 item.
     

    Alex - which way would you go?

    Stuart

    On 10:55:11 22 October 2008 AlexT wrote:

    Would you select internet marketing applications that deliver solely high volume of new customers (cost-effectively) or would you invest resources in lifetime value analysis for customer acquisition? Why?

    (Assuming I am an online retailer with an average online sale of £ 100)

  3. Alex Tonello

    DLG

    23 October 2008 12:07pm

    Alex Tonello

    Stuart,

    I would think that most companies would use the high-volume approach nowadays however all the research I have found lead to the investment in lifetime value and what the customer will be worth over a longer period.


    I think that ultimately the question here relates to short versus long term marketing strategy. But again almost everyone would say (in theory) that long term view is necessary. 
     

  4. dan barker

    E-Business Consultant at Dan Barker

    23 October 2008 14:00pm

    dan barker

    hi, Alex, probably a stupid answer but: do both!

    daniel

Reply to this thread

Log in to reply to this thread or join Econsultancy for free so you can post to our forums along with other benefits.