Non sellable content in ecommerce?
Featured threads
- How relevant do links need to be? 13 replies
- Tracking Online Response to Marketing/Communications Activities 3 replies
- Behavioural targeting software 4 replies
- Penalty avoidance on English-speaking foreign sites 5 replies
- 3 way linking - good or bad? 21 replies



Office Manager at Wheel:Group
20 April 2005 16:52pm
Hi,
I'm doing some work for a major offline retailer that already has a successful online presence.
They are now looking to add catalogue that is not purchasable online to the site as they believe it will benefit browsers/customers doing research and drive peopleto their stores.
My question is will the addition of this content for research benefit outweigh the disappointment in not being able to purchase the goods online?
also
If they do decide to proceed and list items that can't be bought what is the best way to flag this up?
A disclaimer upfront? I'm not sure if there will be similar products available online alongside ones that are not (most probable) or it'll be entire stand-alone ranges that are not available online (less likely)
Your thoughts most appreciated!
Paul Donohue
MattressOnline.co.uk Ltd
21 April 2005 12:11pm
I have no doubt this will certainly be frustrating and disappointing for internet users, the last thing you want to do is leave a user with a negative image of the brand. Have you thought about the Argos route, allowing no e-commerce items to be purchased or reserved online but only collected or completed in-store?
Steve.
Global Enterprise Solutions Manager at Dell
22 April 2005 08:39am
The internet has created a culture of impatience... waiting 10 seconds has become an age! There is nothing more frustrating than doing all your research and then finding out you've got to to go somewhere else to fulfill. It goes against all best practice because it is a bad experience.
But...if they're adamant, there is a compromise. Provide a clear link to this catalogue making it clear BEFORE they click thru that they can only get this stuff in-store. That way, you don't waste their time..they make the choice to view or not. And if you give a customer that kind of choice of experience on your site, you've gone to very good practice!!
Hope this Help
Dermot O'Mahony
Head of Production
www.o2.co.uk
Network Director - North West at Tradedoubler
22 April 2005 09:18am
I think this will be incredibly frustrating for the end user, as they are getting increasing used to purchasing online - you'll raise their hopes of finding the item they're looking for and then they'll have to wait a bit longer to purchase it. For the company, it also raises the prospect of losing a large amount of potential buyers as they will find it online, like it, but will not be motivated enough to make a trip to the store - especially if they are not 100% sure it is in stock in their size.
However, end users are also quite savvy these days and as long as they are warned explicitly before they enter the catalogue that they cannot buy online, then they can make an informed decision as to whether to take their research on your site further.
Personally, it wouldn't stop me looking, but it would be frustrating.
Dan Cohen
Research Manager
http://www.dgm-uk.com
On 16:52:28 20 April 2005 Haydenlee wrote:
>Hi,
>
>I'm doing some work for a major offline retailer that
>already has a successful online presence.
>
>They are now looking to add catalogue that is not
>purchasable online to the site as they believe it will
>benefit browsers/customers doing research and drive
>peopleto their stores.
>
>My question is will the addition of this content for
>research benefit outweigh the disappointment in not being
>able to purchase the goods online?
>
>also
>
>If they do decide to proceed and list items that can't be
>bought what is the best way to flag this up?
>
>A disclaimer upfront? I'm not sure if there will be
>similar products available online alongside ones that are
>not (most probable) or it'll be entire stand-alone ranges
>that are not available online (less likely)
>
>Your thoughts most appreciated!
>
>Paul Donohue
eBusiness Process Manager at The Linde Group
22 April 2005 17:44pm
A very clear segregation of those products available for purchase online and those that are not will assist is setting and managing customer expectations. Cross-sell links from items unavailable for sale online with those that are will help to address potential customer disappointment,
Amazon itself is replete with examples of obsolete products that are no longer available.
Impatience around use of an online catalague is more likely to be derived more from poor site erformance and usability than it is around whether the product can be bought online. Onlien brochures may well be technologically undemanding, but for the customer they are being relieved of the pressure to but, buy, buy from the outset and can focus instead on researching the right product for their requirements. Overall this can lead to a greater likelihood of a sale taking place.
Managing Director at Progenit
26 April 2005 15:30pm
The content will be of value to the user. Users turn to the web for product information to inform choices - whether it can be purchased online or not.Three thoughts spring to mind:If the product is readily available online elsewhere and/or is not strongly differentiated then you need to seriously question the commercial value against the operating costs.Think about where on your site the user would begin a purchase journey for the display-only products. Flag it there – don’t let the user think they have started a purchase journey. User disappointment is “oh, its not available online – I’ll buy the rest of it though/buy something else”. Frustration is “I thought I was buying that and I get to the checkout and its not available. [closes window]”Consider how you could use the web to add-value to the catalogue content. How can you help the user choose? How can you link the content to the store experience? How can you support the sale of the product in ways that would not be possible in store?Hope that helps.Matthew
On 16:52:28 20 April 2005 Haydenlee wrote: