1. Dan Zambonini Bronze

    Technical Director at Box UK

    30 November 2004 17:37pm

    Dan Zambonini

    We've been considering joining the W3C (www.w3.org) for a few years now.  As a company that makes heavy use of - and contributes towards the development of - a whole array of emerging XML technologies, being able to contribute more directly to their direction would be useful.  However, with the membership cost being relatively high (can't remember exactly, but a couple of thousand pounds at least), we still haven't made a decision.

    More recently though, the W3C have started rotating links to their members pages on the W3C homepage.  Their homepage has a Google pagerank of 10 - so my question is to the SEO experts - what 'value' does this link provide, in terms of increasing the PR of member homepages?

    Dan

  2. Daniel Phillips

    Online Marketing / SEO at forum30.co.uk

    01 December 2004 09:51am

    Daniel Phillips

    The link from the members page will provide some benefit as it's a permanent link.  Although the PR passed on to the member's homepages will be 'diluted' as there are another 300+ links on the page.

    The link from the homepage wouldn't provide any long-term benefit, because as soon as it is removed from the page any PR benefit will be lost.

    The benefits of trying to obtain a high PageRank are vastly overstated.  However, there is definitely a benefit from obtaining links from pages with a high PR as Google will 'rate' that link as more important than a link from a page with a low PR.

    There are obvious benefits from becoming a member of the W3C - but I wouldn't consider SEO to be a deciding factor on whether or not you invest your money there or not.

    Cheers,

    Daniel

    ----------------------------------------
    Daniel Phillips
    Big Picture Interactive
    http://www.bigpictureinteractive.co.uk

  3. Ashley Friedlein Staff

    CEO at Econsultancy

    01 December 2004 10:37am

    Ashley Friedlein

    I'd agree completely that, all things being equal, PageRank is quite a red herring for the most valuable traffic, particularly if you are operating in a niche.

    By way of example from our own experience we currently rank 3rd in Google.co.uk for a search on 'user experience' which links through to our recently published Online Retail User Experience Benchmarks. Which is obviously good for us and is driving sales / subscriptions as a result.

    However, what's the PageRank of that destination page? Zero. 0/10.

    Incidentally, we've noticed that Google appears to apply quite a rankings weighting depending on the recency of publication of the content. Just a few days ago we were No. 1 on the same search and, I suspect, give it a week and we may have dropped further.

    Either way, I wouldn't factor SEO into your thinking for the W3C membership. I'd justify it more in terms of credibility / brand.

    Ashley

  4. Adam Crawford Gold

    SEO at Cheapflights Media

    07 December 2004 10:40am

    Avatar-blank-50x50

    Whilst I would definitely agree that Google’s PageRank values reported in the toolbar certainly don’t mean as much as they used to, I wouldn’t overlook the power of a PageRank 10 link.

    That said, if the majority of links that point to your site are considerably lower than PR10 it is likely there will be a dampening effect on this link.

    I’d agree with the credibility benefits outweighing those of SEO.

  5. lee kelly Bronze

    comtique

    22 April 2006 12:35pm

    lee kelly

    Ive just started an experiment which involves getting a pagerank 0 site to a pagerank 10 within 2 years...

    If your interested you can read my blog at www.pagerank10.co.uk/blog

    Lee Kelly

  6. Adam Crawford Gold

    SEO at Cheapflights Media

    24 April 2006 09:13am

    Avatar-blank-50x50

    you can do it within months with this technique if you really want to.

Reply to this thread

Log in to reply to this thread or join Econsultancy for free so you can post to our forums along with other benefits.