Thanks Chris - more specifically I'm looking for a tool which will allow people to mark-up web pages online in some way and then aggregate the mark-ups of multiple people and provide some workflow around those. Ever come across something like that?
Have you come across Axure - I think that is more for prototypes / wireframes rather than actual websites though? I've never used it myself but I know people who say it's great for prototyping in a collaborate way. Have a look and see what you think.
Regards
Ashley Friedlein CEO E-consultancy.com
On 09:16:18 23 January 2008 AlLoehnis wrote:
Thanks Chris - more specifically I'm looking for a tool which will allow people to mark-up web pages online in some way and then aggregate the mark-ups of multiple people and provide some workflow around those. Ever come across something like that?
If you put the website on a publicly accessible server, then the Firefox extension Fleck will do what you want. (If you remember E-quill, now defunct after Microsoft bought them, it works a lot like that.)
This post on TechCrunch lists four more alternatives: http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/04/10/5-ways-to-mark-up-the-web/
Disclaimer: Even though I've always considered Fleck (and services like it) potentially very useful, I've actually never tried it out myself for this purpose. I'll be curious to know what you end up using, and how it went.
I am reading your post a little different then others. The bigger question is how do you manage the many voices and comments and determine what you should actually do on your site.
The key to managing many voices is to make sure you have an accurate, precise and reliable measurement of the voice of your customer. Not only knowing what they like and dislike, but also what will drive the behavior you are looking for. If you apply science to your measurement it can be a great tool to prioritize your improvements and put the customer first. Check out www.foreseeresults.com, the methodology used there has proven to provide the scientific voice of the customer and a great tool in the pioritization of improvements.
Thanks Ashley (long time..hope all's well!). Axure looks great for collaboration around wireframes/prototypes and requirements scoping.
I guess the problem I'm trying to solve is more around content rather than transaction-driven sites , where clients often have lots of people who want to review content and page layouts before they go live.
I was thinking that a web interface could be used to allow comments to be made on-screen and then have all comments collated and a workflow applied so that one can manage the iterative process of receiving and implementing changes.
Online 'post-it' notes applications are half way there, but this functionality seems to be geared towards social/collaborative tagging uses. Guess we could try and adapt that concept though. Failing which we resort to rigorous enforcement of project management processes!
On 10:15:28 23 January 2008 Ashley wrote:
Hi Al
Have you come across Axure - I think that is more for prototypes / wireframes rather than actual websites though? I've never used it myself but I know people who say it's great for prototyping in a collaborate way. Have a look and see what you think.
Regards
Ashley Friedlein CEO E-consultancy.com
On 09:16:18 23 January 2008 AlLoehnis wrote:
Thanks Chris - more specifically I'm looking for a tool which will allow people to mark-up web pages online in some way and then aggregate the mark-ups of multiple people and provide some workflow around those. Ever come across something like that?
Adapting one of the post-it style applications may be your best bet. From a cursory inspection, Diigo seems most advanced in this respect, e.g. with comment aggregation.
Wikipedia has some more web annotation applications.
Adapting one of the post-it style applications may be your best bet. From a cursory inspection, Diigo seems most advanced in this respect, e.g. with comment aggregation.
Wikipedia has some more web annotation applications.
Business Development Director at Investis Ltd
22 January 2008 11:59am
When you have multiple people providing comments and change requests things can quickly get out of hand.
Can anyone recommend any effective tools/methods for managing the client review process of a website build project?
Director of Product Development at Econsultancy
22 January 2008 14:31pm
Hey Al,
Basecamp is pretty good for this and used by lots of agencies when working on client projects. It's cheap as chips too.
c.
Business Development Director at Investis Ltd
23 January 2008 09:16am
Thanks Chris - more specifically I'm looking for a tool which will allow people to mark-up web pages online in some way and then aggregate the mark-ups of multiple people and provide some workflow around those. Ever come across something like that?
CEO at Econsultancy
23 January 2008 10:15am
Hi Al
Have you come across Axure - I think that is more for prototypes / wireframes rather than actual websites though? I've never used it myself but I know people who say it's great for prototyping in a collaborate way. Have a look and see what you think.
Regards
Ashley Friedlein
CEO
E-consultancy.com
On 09:16:18 23 January 2008 AlLoehnis wrote:
Director of User Experience at Isotoma
23 January 2008 11:10am
Hi,
If you put the website on a publicly accessible server, then the Firefox extension Fleck will do what you want. (If you remember E-quill, now defunct after Microsoft bought them, it works a lot like that.)
This post on TechCrunch lists four more alternatives:
http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/04/10/5-ways-to-mark-up-the-web/
Disclaimer: Even though I've always considered Fleck (and services like it) potentially very useful, I've actually never tried it out myself for this purpose. I'll be curious to know what you end up using, and how it went.
francois
Marketing Director at ForeSee Results
23 January 2008 13:36pm
I am reading your post a little different then others. The bigger question is how do you manage the many voices and comments and determine what you should actually do on your site.
The key to managing many voices is to make sure you have an accurate, precise and reliable measurement of the voice of your customer. Not only knowing what they like and dislike, but also what will drive the behavior you are looking for. If you apply science to your measurement it can be a great tool to prioritize your improvements and put the customer first. Check out www.foreseeresults.com, the methodology used there has proven to provide the scientific voice of the customer and a great tool in the pioritization of improvements.
Business Development Director at Investis Ltd
23 January 2008 14:13pm
Thanks Ashley (long time..hope all's well!). Axure looks great for collaboration around wireframes/prototypes and requirements scoping.
I guess the problem I'm trying to solve is more around content rather than transaction-driven sites , where clients often have lots of people who want to review content and page layouts before they go live.
I was thinking that a web interface could be used to allow comments to be made on-screen and then have all comments collated and a workflow applied so that one can manage the iterative process of receiving and implementing changes.
Online 'post-it' notes applications are half way there, but this functionality seems to be geared towards social/collaborative tagging uses. Guess we could try and adapt that concept though. Failing which we resort to rigorous enforcement of project management processes!
On 10:15:28 23 January 2008 Ashley wrote:
Director of User Experience at Isotoma
23 January 2008 14:37pm
Adapting one of the post-it style applications may be your best bet. From a cursory inspection, Diigo seems most advanced in this respect, e.g. with comment aggregation.
Wikipedia has some more web annotation applications.
francois
Business Development Director at Investis Ltd
23 January 2008 15:29pm
Very helpful - thanks
On 14:37:19 23 January 2008 fjordaan wrote:
Founder at Resourceguruapp.com and StagsandHens.com
23 January 2008 18:13pm
have a look at these:
http://www.proofitonline.com
http://www.marketingcentral.com
http://www.conceptshare.com
On 11:59:24 22 January 2008 AlLoehnis wrote: