For colour, I’ve embedded tweets by the websites’ often disgruntled users.
1. GQ
I haven’t seen this anywhere else. GQ is resourceful enough not only to request you disable your ad blocker, but to allow you to purchase access instead (if you insist on blocking ads).
There’s also some natty reasoning for such a standpoint, pointing out that glossy photoshoots cost money.
However, as Alec rightly points to, there’s something absurd about this message overlaying a pop-up ad, which then overlays the content. This is the not the web as anybody wants it.
this “please disable your ad blocker” pop-up is popped-over a pop-up ad, which is on top of the #content pic.twitter.com/cZNtOHWvPe
— alec pesola (@alecpesola) February 2, 2016
2. Telegraph
The Telegraph wins the award for most comprehensive message. It’s very civil (try reading it in a BBC accent) and takes the opportunity to push a free trial of the subscription product.
Part of me says “no, The Telegraph, I won’t disable my ad blocker for you.” But then how else do they make their £? pic.twitter.com/lDpdhiMljR
— Chris Miller (@WindyCOYS) February 7, 2016
3. Forbes
Forbes takes an interesting tack, championing its ‘ad light experience’ rather than tugging at the heart strings.
The publisher niggles at you once again if you click continue and still haven’t disabled your software (note the ‘still using an ad blocker’ message).
Derek’s tweet highlights the absurdity of calling Forbes ‘ad light’, but it’s all relative, I suppose.
So @Forbes, when you say “Pls disable your ad blocker” you mean “pls disable Ghostery too & allow us to track you.” pic.twitter.com/C2vNrnIVoJ
— Milady de Winter (@milady2winter) February 6, 2016
—
The @Forbes ”ad-light” experience they make you disable your ad blocker for. pic.twitter.com/yeHoagaOT3
— Derek (@derekdahmer) December 27, 2015
4. Washington Post
Perhaps a slightly contradictory message from the Post. ‘We’re committed to…respecting your privacy…please disable your ad blocker’.
The Washington Post may highlight how safe its ads are, but fails to deal with the underlying reasons ads are necessary, even if they do compromise user experience.
Washington Post website hopes to convince users to disable their ad-blocker by denying access http://t.co/rpW4tjQFrs pic.twitter.com/hjuiqEoZuS
— GFMosca (@GFMosca) September 22, 2015
5. CNET
CNET comes across as a thoroughly-nice-guy of a publisher.
That may be, but FreeMan exclaims it’s not so easy to just quickly switch off an ad blocker on his iPhone.
@CNET nicely presented but didn’t make me disable my ad blocker… Easy to do on desktop but 5+ steps on iOS pic.twitter.com/VivMDNm6fS
— FreeMan (@nabilfreeman) December 17, 2015
6. Wired
I admire Wired’s copywriting here. It’s pragmatic. It’s an honest request for good favour with the slightest hint of supplication (‘thanks for supporting Wired’).
Wired’s site asks users to disable their ad-blocker. What are your thoughts as a marketer? Only way to stay free? pic.twitter.com/4AHOBD5fCT
— Roohbir Singh (@RoohbirSingh) June 25, 2015
7. Hulu
Hulu is admirable here for its succinctness, getting to the nub of the debate ‘advertisements allow us to provide quality content to you for free’.
Also, kudos to Nico for his steadfast, public refusal.
No @hulu
I will never disable my ad blocker. pic.twitter.com/1uboCn0pLk— Nico Juncos (@strangecomedian) July 19, 2014
8. CBS
Nothing particularly interesting from CBS and CBS News. No appealing to our sensibilities, aside from mention of sponsors.
As Brian Fitzgerald points out, the chances of non-US, ad blocking users accessing this content are slim.
Sure, CBS, I’ll disable my ad blocker. But then I hit your foreign-viewer blocker. You clearly want to be left alone. pic.twitter.com/lMW8WifwdI
— Brian Fitzgerald (@brianfit) February 16, 2015
—
Ha! I’m thinking about adding more lists to my ad blocker.
maybe even disable javascript. 😉 pic.twitter.com/32gXiD2MuQ
— Art Dahnert (@adahnert) January 22, 2016
9. Emeza
Emeza was a luxury ecommerce site run by Zalando, which shut down in 2013. I’m not sure why an ecommerce site would prevent users from browsing.
Perhaps it was a default message implemented by an off-the-shelf CMS or ecommerce platform. Whatever the reason, it was stupid – even if users can’t be tracked by analytics, they could still buy.
Don´t force someone to disable your ad blocker! Fail #emeza pic.twitter.com/8Mg1IDtG1Y
— Boris Schandert (@bschandert) March 21, 2013
10. QNimate
Lastly, a programming tutorial website. I admire this functional and emotionless messaging – it smacks of morals.
But on the other hand, QNimate could be doing more with this space.
Web developers out there, don’t ever force your users to disable any kind of ad blocker. This is a big no no pic.twitter.com/vIHQ3k4QAU
— Pascal Precht ʕ•̫͡•ʔ (@PascalPrecht) December 1, 2015
For more on ad blocking, see the following articles:
Comments