{{ searchResult.published_at | date:'d MMMM yyyy' }}

Loading ...
Loading ...

Enter a search term such as “mobile analytics” or browse our content using the filters above.

No_results

That’s not only a poor Scrabble score but we also couldn’t find any results matching “”.
Check your spelling or try broadening your search.

Logo_distressed

Sorry about this, there is a problem with our search at the moment.
Please try again later.

For many newspapers, the decision to erect a paywall has been a decision of last resort.

And for a seemingly good reason: despite the obvious need to generate the type of revenue that advertising often can't provide alone, asking the consumers of your content to pay for the privilege can be a difficult undertaking.

Case in point: when John L. Robinson, a professor at Elon University, asked the students in his class if they would pay a fee to use Facebook, all agreed they'd pay $1/month for the world's largest and most popular social network. A smaller number indicated they'd be willing to pay $5, none said they'd pay $10.

Robinson's story may be anecdotal, but chances are most of us would expect the results he reported from his informal, statistically insignificant poll to be fairly representative of the population at large.

After all, today's consumer has been conditioned to love -- and expect -- free.

Which creates a worrisome question for newspaper execs: if university students wouldn't pay more than $5/month to access the most popular social network in the world, a service that many consider to be an indispensible part of their social lives, can a newspaper realistically expect to charge much more than $5/month for its content?

"Perhaps not" might be the logical answer, which is why Robinson says that the creation of a newspaper paywall is like "using a Band-Aid on a bullet wound."
But is he right?

Outside of the United States, some newspapers are doing better than one might have expected with the paywall model. Piano Media, for instance, has achieved promising results in Slovakia and Slovenia, and is reportedly set to take its model into a larger market in the very near future.

According to Piano Media's Tomas Bella, who I interviewed last year, one of the keys to getting consumers to pay for newspaper content in Slovakia and Slovenia was to "break a 'will never pay' barrier." The jury, of course, is still out on whether the revenue from inexpensive subscriptions can be enough to support the type of news organizations that were built when the newspaper commanded far more dollars from advertisers.

In the United States, however, at least one big investor is apparently confident enough that they can play a meaningful role to put his money where his mouth is.

Last week, Warren Buffett's Berkshire Hathaway purchased the bulk of Media General's newspapers for a nine-figure sum. Most of the newspapers in Media General's stable are moving to a paywall model, which Buffett seems to believe is big part of the future of the newspaper business.

As Poynter's Andrew Beaujon notes, the Oracle of Omaha stated earlier this year:

[Newspapers] have been giving away their product at the same time they're selling it...and that is not a great business model. When they put papers up on the Internet and you get free, you’re competing with yourself. And throughout the industry you’re seeing a reaction to that problem and an answer to it. … You shouldn’t be giving away a product you’re trying to sell.

Buffett may be right that newspapers made a big mistake in embracing free, but that doesn't answer the billion-dollar question: now that the genie is out of the bottle, can the paywall help contain it?

The good news for newspapers is that new media upstarts intent on disrupting the business of news gathering, particularly at the local level served by the kind of newspapers Buffett is most interested in, have thus far proven to be expensive, less-than-fruitful ventures. This doesn't mean, however, that newspapers can count on the money being there.

So what are newspapers to do while this plays out? It would seem that newspapers wanting to survive are still going to have to reorganize themselves to fit the economics of the present while they wait to see if their new paywalls deliver a slightly better future.

Patricio Robles

Published 29 May, 2012 by Patricio Robles

Patricio Robles is a tech reporter at Econsultancy. Follow him on Twitter.

2341 more posts from this author

Comments (4)

Niranjan Sridharan

Niranjan Sridharan, Digital Auditor at ABC

Oracle of Omaha or not this is one horse that I am not backing. Even if all major newspapers decide to paywall, it will take all of a week for a free but half decent alternative to replace it.

It is imperative to remember that we are in a generation where news is social. Where people turn to slashdot, techcruch, econsultancy etc etc for news.

Don't get me wrong, newspapers that have a great brand and terrific content already have successful paywalls, freemium models but the rest need to think out of the box. Which is why, I love the new model advocated by Ashley Hifield at JP.

almost 4 years ago

Avatar-blank-50x50

Colin McDermott

Personal testimony coming up: it may be a generational thing, maybe even a UK thing, because I was brought up reading daily newspapers. But these days, although I'm instinctively an online advocate I still take 2 x daily National newspapers 7 x days a week and feel my day's incomplete if I don't read them cover to cover.

Until this week I also took our local 'evening' paper 6 x days a week but they've just stopped publishing a daily version and will produce their very first 'weekly' 230 page blockbuster tomorrow.

My total weekly outlay on various different print-media was therefore just a little north of £10 per week.

But would I pay £10 per week for access to a single general news outlet paywall .... nope.

almost 4 years ago

Avatar-blank-50x50

Robert Howells, Website Manager at Elsevier

News is instant and ongoing whereas papers are printed the night before so they are immediately out of date. The paywall model could be for up-to-date news deliverd to your device of choice, while free just gives you a copy of the print version plus adverts online. The elephant in the room of course is the BBC who are doing it better and free than most newspapers.

almost 4 years ago

Avatar-blank-50x50

Dale Dreps

If college students are willing to pay for music on iTunes ultimately they will pay for news, especially if newspapers stop giving it away for free.

almost 4 years ago

Comment
No-profile-pic
Save or Cancel
Daily_pulse_signup_wide

Enjoying this article?

Get more just like this, delivered to your inbox.

Keep up to date with the latest analysis, inspiration and learning from the Econsultancy blog with our free Daily Pulse newsletter. Each weekday, you ll receive a hand-picked digest of the latest and greatest articles, as well as snippets of new market data, best practice guides and trends research.