{{ searchResult.published_at | date:'d MMMM yyyy' }}

Loading ...
Loading ...

Enter a search term such as “mobile analytics” or browse our content using the filters above.

No_results

That’s not only a poor Scrabble score but we also couldn’t find any results matching “”.
Check your spelling or try broadening your search.

Logo_distressed

Sorry about this, there is a problem with our search at the moment.
Please try again later.

Mobile design brings with it numerous challenges. From performance to form factor to platform/OS fragmentation, there are numerous barriers companies must leap if they want to build a successful mobile app.

But is mobile design failure an inevitable fact of life? According to Dave Morin, the founder and CEO of Path, the answer is yes.

Speaking at VentureBeat's MobileBeat 2012 conference, Morin recounted Path's early days and stated "The way you should think about mobile is that your first version’s probably going to fail. Path today has some 2m-plus users," despite an embarrassing privacy flub earlier in the year, but according to Morin, "The first version of Path was 70 percent a failure."

There were several reasons for this. For one, Path's designers were apparently more fluent in web than mobile, and they designed a complex app sporting numerous features spread across multiple tabs and screens. That, perhaps not surprisingly, didn't work, and 20 iterations later, after collecting feedback and focusing on what users were actually using their app for, Morin and his team had a much more focused and simple version of Path.

There's a difference between FAIL and room for improvement.

Path's launch-and-iterate approach is not an uncommon one. Designing the perfect application is difficult, if not downright impossible -- whether on mobile or the web. But does that mean one should expect a mobile app to essentially fail at first? Fortunately not, as there's a huge difference between a design fail and a design that simply requires improvement.

In the mobile realm, many companies make the same mistake as Path: they design their mobile applications like they would web applications. And for plenty of reasons, including the fact that there are a lot more designers out there with significant web design experience than mobile design experience.

But that doesn't mean that Path's initial path is one that every company must follow. Mobile design best practices are being established, there are a growing number of designers with mobile chops, and trying to build a sophisticated app that does a lot of things and requires complex interactions (instead of a simple app that does one or two things really, really well) is a mistake that can be avoided.

Put the right people of the job and avoid basic mistakes and designing a good mobile application becomes a lot like designing a good web application: you can't expect you'll get it 100% right the first time, but doing more things right than wrong is an achievable goal.

Patricio Robles

Published 11 July, 2012 by Patricio Robles

Patricio Robles is a tech reporter at Econsultancy. Follow him on Twitter.

2401 more posts from this author

Comments (1)

John Waghorn

John Waghorn, Content Marketer at Koozai Ltd

I guess we are still learning and adapting to the process and as well as this the boundaries are shifting as the pace of technology gets faster. As you mentioned, it’s no easy feat, so if you get it right first time round you’ve done really well. Once the foundations are in place you can make changes and improvements as you notice certain elements that could be changed.

about 4 years ago

Comment
No-profile-pic
Save or Cancel
Daily_pulse_signup_wide

Enjoying this article?

Get more just like this, delivered to your inbox.

Keep up to date with the latest analysis, inspiration and learning from the Econsultancy blog with our free Daily Pulse newsletter. Each weekday, you ll receive a hand-picked digest of the latest and greatest articles, as well as snippets of new market data, best practice guides and trends research.