{{ searchResult.published_at | date:'d MMMM yyyy' }}

Loading ...
Loading ...

Enter a search term such as “mobile analytics” or browse our content using the filters above.

No_results

That’s not only a poor Scrabble score but we also couldn’t find any results matching “”.
Check your spelling or try broadening your search.

Logo_distressed

Sorry about this, there is a problem with our search at the moment.
Please try again later.

After Facebook, Twitter is arguably the highest-profile social network out there, and could conceivably follow in the footsteps of the world's largest social network with a public offering of its own in 2013.

Facebook and Twitter both face challenges. Facebook's most pressing challenge: how to monetize its billion-plus users. Twitter's most pressing challenge: how to transition from a communications platform provider to a media company.

That transition is proving quite difficult. Not because the change is costing Twitter money in the short term. To the contrary: the popular social network is going the media company route because it looks to be far more lucrative. Instead, the transition is challenging because of all the people Twitter is leaving in the dust.

Many of those left hanging are developers. Some built entire businesses on the Twitter API with the assumption that Twitter itself had no intention of building the functionality they offered, only to be cut off when Twitter changed its mind.

But it's not just developers who feel betrayed. In July 2010, social analytics firm PeopleBrowsr struck a deal with Twitter to license its firehose, through which hundreds of millions of tweets flow each day. PeopleBrowsr relies on that firehose to provide data to its clients, but when Twitter decided to delegate firehose licensing to three other firms, it notified PeopleBrowsr that it would be terminating their licensing agreement and pointed PeopleBrowsr to its new partners.

Instead of opting to license the Twitter firehose through one of those partners, however, PeopleBrowsr sued Twitter, alleging that it had built its business on the assumption that Twitter was open. "We relied on Twitter’s promise of openness when we invested millions of dollars and thousands of hours of development time," PeopleBrowsr's CEO, Jodee Rich, stated.

Earlier this week, a Superior Court judge in San Francisco issued a restraining order preventing Twitter from cutting off firehose access to PeopleBrowsr until a hearing in early January.

Temporary victory?

Twitter has responded to PeopleBrowsr in court with a simple message: "This is Contracts 101." According to Twitter, its agreement with PeopleBrowsr was on a month-to-month basis at the time of termination, and the terms of the agreement gave either party the right to terminate for any reason with 30 days notice.

Instead of licensing Twitter's firehose data through one of Twitter's remaining partners, Twitter says PeopleBrowsr has chosen to file a nonsensical lawsuit that is without merit. To boot, it claims that PeopleBrowsr owes it hundreds of thousands of dollars in unpaid licensing fees.

On the surface, it seems likely that PeopleBrowsr's victory against Twitter will be short-lived, but even so, the legal spat is perhaps the most powerful example of how the business model changes Twitter has made in the past year are alienating third parties that it works with or used to work with.

In this case, even if Twitter's argument -- that it simply decided to terminate a contract upon terms in that contract -- is entirely legitimate, as most reasonable people would believe, the way in which numerous Twitter's relationships, formal and informal, seem to be falling apart suggests that the company's transition from communications platform to media company will continue to be rocky.

Poisoning the ecosystem

In the end, Twitter's new approach may very well prove to be the right one financially, but it raises questions that extend far beyond Twitter. One of the biggest: how will the change of strategy at a company that once touted how 'open' it was affect the ecosystem as a whole? Will developers and entrepreneurs become more cautious building on third party platforms? Or will they assume that the Twitter case study is the exception, not the rule?

Time will tell. In the meantime, Twitter will have to battle its former allies, both in the court of public opinion, and in court.

Patricio Robles

Published 30 November, 2012 by Patricio Robles

Patricio Robles is a tech reporter at Econsultancy. Follow him on Twitter.

2381 more posts from this author

Comments (5)

Avatar-blank-50x50

vmcampos

Every time I read about Twitter becoming less open, and losing more of what made it great, it makes me sad.
I hope they really listen to their developers, and reconsider some of their more draconian plans (Tweetro was an amazing app, sorry to see it crippeled).

over 3 years ago

Avatar-blank-50x50

Ron Rodney

Have none of these developers and entrepreneurs heard of digital sharecropping?

The phrase was first mentioned by Nicholas Carr back in 2006 and Copyblogger media have been reminding people about it ever since.

Those developers and entrepreneurs still thinking of building their businesses on borrowed digital land had better read those 2 sources first.

over 3 years ago

Avatar-blank-50x50

Deri Jones, CEO at SciVisum.co.uk

It may be less simple than you suggest, Patricio.

> Instead of licensing Twitter's firehose data through one of Twitter's remaining partners..

Well, from what I've read:

PeopleBrowsr are claiming that only a portion of the Firehose will be available through Twitter's new partners - not the whole feed.

So it seems the option of just buying from one of them instead of direct from Twitter, and carrying on as if nothing has changed - is not open to PeopleBrowsr.

over 3 years ago

Avatar-blank-50x50

Hopeful cynic

Ron has it right. It's a painful lesson but what PeopleBrowsr have is a hobby, not a business. Same goes for anyone who depends on Google, Amazon etc for the majority of their income.

over 3 years ago

Panos Ladas

Panos Ladas, Digital Marketing Manager at Piece of Cake

Ron & Hopeful Cynic, indeed you have it right. When anyone invests millions on the basis of anything less than a solid written agreement they actually have a hobby, not a business!

over 3 years ago

Comment
No-profile-pic
Save or Cancel
Daily_pulse_signup_wide

Enjoying this article?

Get more just like this, delivered to your inbox.

Keep up to date with the latest analysis, inspiration and learning from the Econsultancy blog with our free Daily Pulse newsletter. Each weekday, you ll receive a hand-picked digest of the latest and greatest articles, as well as snippets of new market data, best practice guides and trends research.