{{ searchResult.published_at | date:'d MMMM yyyy' }}

Loading ...
Loading ...

Enter a search term such as “mobile analytics” or browse our content using the filters above.

No_results

That’s not only a poor Scrabble score but we also couldn’t find any results matching “”.
Check your spelling or try broadening your search.

Logo_distressed

Sorry about this, there is a problem with our search at the moment.
Please try again later.

In the past few years, companies and brands’ digital ambitions have grown. 

More and more sites and apps are being built for longevity, and customers increasingly want fast and functional websites that are both reliable and easy to use.

All of this has meant that in-house technical teams have seen their remits broadening and their capacities stretched. Now, as well as working on complex creative concepts, they’re expected to deliver the support and maintenance to sustain these technical builds.

Outsourcing technical work used to be something very few companies did – and generally only when pushed by time constraints.

Recent industry studies, however, indicate a fast-growing outsourcing trend – not just for those companies with small or no technical departments, but also for those with established teams who understand that using trusted technical partners gives them resources and specialist skills when they’re most needed, without the cost of hiring extra heads.

The Econsultancy / United Studios Digital Outsourcing Survey (2012) shows that outsourcing was practised by over half (57%) the agencies that participated in the survey, with technical work being the most likely area for companies to outsource (66%) and mobile applications the most commonly outsourced service (64%).

In which areas do you outsource the most digital work?

The European IT Outsourcing Intelligence Report (2012, UK report) also threw up some interesting statistics relating to the fast growth in software-development outsourcing within the UK, which it mainly attributes to mobile projects.

The findings show that companies have started to outsource to a number of different partners throughout the year, in order to take advantage of specific skills in-line with their requirements. The report cites peer reference as the number one way that firms choose their technical partners, ahead of RFPs and RFIs.

Looking ahead to 2013 and beyond, it’s clear that this growing outsourcing trend will allow firms the flexibility and scalability they require as they’re faced with an ever-increasing number of technology formats, and the need for specialist staff in each area.

As in any other walk of life, choosing a suitable partner for your technical work can be a daunting task; but it’s all-important if you’re going to trust them with your precious work – and, by extension, your reputation.

So, where do you start? Having a plan when it comes to sourcing a partner can save a lot of heartache down the line and ensure that you have the right people for the job.

These three pointers are pretty basic, but as a high-level plan they provide the foundation for your agency to navigate this sea change and get ahead of the game.

This advice is testable, so you should quickly recognize what you need to do where the tests fail. And you can start implementing some of it right away.

1. Get your internal team right

The first step to using a technical partner to your advantage: understand that you’ll still need technical people. You’ll need fewer developers, but more technical directors.

The technical directors will plan and design the projects, and help manage your technical partners. The way technology is going – as platforms and interface types multiply – having a single technical director will be a challenge for even a mid-sized agency.

Technical directors with specialisms will really start to pay dividends over time. Remember to get them in on every stage of a project – including the planning meetings. A quick piece of advice at the start can save thousands of wasted pounds on features that are too complex at the end.

Everyone knows the right project manager can make a project run like clockwork. I’ve found the best project managers are almost religious in their attention to administration. However, too often they can be left with the responsibility of delivering a complex technical project.

This just isn’t right. You should look to your technical partner to take responsibility for the technical part of the project, and the good ones will be happy to do so.

The technical partner should also be supplying a timing plan, weekly progress reports and the other typical artefacts (see below), all as part of their value.

Finally: your client-services or account-management team. Too often people in these roles are desperately in need of training in digital. Making sure an account manager knows the basics of data protection – and that Facebook doesn’t let you spam people – is money well spent.

And, perhaps most importantly, the account team needs to be fearless, and to get the client’s IT department involved early on in every project. Over and over again we’ve seen well-intentioned campaigns or app ideas cut to shreds by corporate IT policy, resulting in wasted money for the agency. Get IT involved.

2. Get your internal systems sorted

If you can’t get the internal team right – and let’s face it, you may have quite a few challenges in that department – you must ensure you get the internal systems together. Doing this will reduce your reliance on people instinctively “doing the right thing”, and therefore reduce the chance a project will get into trouble.

Many agencies don’t necessarily realize it, but by producing apps and websites they are actually engineering software. This discipline is not new, and there are basic practices that many agencies simply overlook because they don’t really get it.

They tend to concentrate on the idea or the vision, rather than looking at the delivery – and this is one of the main reasons agencies are increasingly favouring technical partners.

The cornerstone of internal systems has to be version control. Without it projects are unlikely to be completed to any acceptable standard (see CMMI level one). Hopefully all agencies have this in place. (If your agency doesn’t, maybe think about moving to an agency that does.) To support a technical partner, it’s best to implement a distributed version-control system – and one that can be accessed externally. You don’t want the headache of having to perform a manual merge into the internal system from an external source.

If you can, implement continuous integration for each project; this will provide an almost real-time view of the current projects state. Also, for a good idea of where the project is, hold regular demos where the technical partner walks you through the system. It’s best not to start making too many changes at this point – although any good technical partner should be able to navigate around these for you.

If you have continuous integration, make sure you add a couple of code metrics and quality checks. Looking for duplicate code is one of the best indicators of quality on a project; too many duplicates and you know the solution will be high maintenance, and therefore buggy.  There are lots of other metrics you can track, but duplicate code and cyclometric complexity are about the best we’ve found.

You’ll also need a good shared externally accessible ticketing/story system. This will track requirements and bugs and make sure everyone knows who’s doing what. A couple to try out are Assembla or, an agency favourite, EasyBacklog.

Finally, you need to make sure that the project is specified in the right way. I wouldn’t suggest a return to rigid waterfall; however, the technical partner needs to know what you’re asking them to build. Keep this simple, with annotated wireframes and a good technical specification of the target platform – including non-functional requirements. 

You should also include your technical standards. The documents should be in shared storage and versioned for each project so the technical partner has ready access to them. The version numbers should be referenced on communication to reduce confusion. Dropbox is ideal for this.

3. Get the right technical partner

The third point is obvious, really, isn’t it? But it’s not necessarily easy; after making the decision to push more work out to a technical partner, how (and who) do you choose?

Firstly, shop around the market. Get recommendations from others in the industry and compile a shortlist. Get them in for an initial chemistry meeting and sign NDAs. I won’t go into specifics of procurement but here are a few things to look out for.

Make sure they’re led by highly passionate and experience people: people who have reputations to keep. Check there’s a single accountable person for each project, and that they are full-time, permanent staff – or, better yet, board directors.

Nothing stuffs up a project quicker than the main person leaving halfway through. One of our clients once supplied seven different project managers on one six-month project – because they were all contractors. Ideally, the accountable person for a project should be a top-level technical director; it’s no use having to talk to a project manager when the heat is on.

You should also check that your prospective partner has excellent recommendations. The team should use modern development practices, but nothing too risky or faddish – avoid trendsters. The partner should also have an engineering background, rather than just development. And, crucially, they should know how agencies work.

Finally (as I mentioned in my previous article), you need to make sure your technical partner can – and will – support and maintain the system after delivery. And that they’ll supply documentation around this. Although the additional cost might seem annoying, no system yet built has been known to support and maintain itself, despite the highest of hopes on the part of agencies.

Richard Bundock

Published 2 January, 2013 by Richard Bundock

Richard Bundock is Managing Partner at Cohaesus and a contributor to Econsultancy. 

2 more posts from this author

Comments (6)

Comment
No-profile-pic
Save or Cancel
Mark Selwyn

Mark Selwyn, eCommerce and Multi-Channel Retail Consultant

Spamlink on the previous commenter's URL.

Good article, however any partner of any scale is unlikely to have a board director available to run each customer project. Continuity though is essential.

almost 4 years ago

Avatar-blank-50x50

Valerie Laforest, Consultant Project Manager, communities specialist at Community Jane

Thanks for this article. As a Project Manager, I appreciated many aspects. Please write something soon about how important Governance and Change Management are, and how they can as well make every endeavor a success or a painful failure.

almost 4 years ago

Avatar-blank-50x50

Shaleen Shah

Thanks for sharing the stats on outsourcing and your tips are spot on. I think the real challenge is not about finding the right team who can fit with your company, skill-wise - but those who also fit personality-wise. Do you think it's better if we call project managers..project leaders? This way, they will feel more empowered to lead by example.

almost 4 years ago

Richard Bundock

Richard Bundock, Managing Director at Cohaesus

Thanks everyone for the comments.

@Mark: I have to question if the technical partner is really that committed to providing a quality service if a board director isn't prepared to be accountable for the work. I appreciate that not all firms are setup like this, but we feel it is the best way to ensure a consistent high-quality delivery.

@Shaleen: I think personality is important but not the main concern. Obviously, if you just don't get on with them, choose again.

@Shaleen: On the idea of Project Managers, I feel that leaving the responsibility for the entire project to a manager who is not able to understand consequence of decisions is a dereliction of care to the client. At Cohaesus (sorry for the plug) project management is integrated into the technical team, with the Technical Director leading the project and being accountable. We have a couple of project managers but they deal with the administration of the projects rather than being responsible for a project. This means we have less meetings, less communication and can deliver faster with less risk.

I am not proposing that Agencies sack their project managers, but I would be wary of a technical partner that is structured like an agency -- internally they are two very different ways of working. In my experience, two project managers talking to each other on a technical project usually ends in decisions that won't work.

BTW My use of project manager in this context, means someone that doesn't currently write software. I see nothing wrong with a developer, engineer taking on project management tasks.

almost 4 years ago

Mark Selwyn

Mark Selwyn, eCommerce and Multi-Channel Retail Consultant

Richard - I am sure board directors of technical partners are prepared to be accountable for projects, but having them run or manage projects personally is unrealistic in all but small technical partners.

But I agree with you, having that top level committment will give you a better chance of success.

almost 4 years ago

Avatar-blank-50x50

Michael Olaye

Great right up Richard. I totally agree with you on the revolving door of freelancers in positions that are critical to projects.

As for Tech Directors, you'll find that if they have 2 or 3 senior Tech Leads assisting, can easy the headache.

Some Tech Directors are working on multiple projects at the 1 time, and we use our Tech Leads to cover certain areas.

But for me the champion for a project as a whole will always be the Project Manager.

almost 4 years ago

Comment
No-profile-pic
Save or Cancel
Daily_pulse_signup_wide

Enjoying this article?

Get more just like this, delivered to your inbox.

Keep up to date with the latest analysis, inspiration and learning from the Econsultancy blog with our free Daily Pulse newsletter. Each weekday, you ll receive a hand-picked digest of the latest and greatest articles, as well as snippets of new market data, best practice guides and trends research.