{{ searchResult.published_at | date:'d MMMM yyyy' }}

Loading ...
Loading ...

Enter a search term such as “mobile analytics” or browse our content using the filters above.

No_results

That’s not only a poor Scrabble score but we also couldn’t find any results matching “”.
Check your spelling or try broadening your search.

Logo_distressed

Sorry about this, there is a problem with our search at the moment.
Please try again later.

Facebook's drive to monetize its massive user base has caused Instagram's first major backlash. Upset with changes to Instagram's terms of service which would allow the company to leverage user data and content in ads, vocal Instagrammers rose up and said "That's not cool!"

While it remains to be seen whether this Instagram backlash has a short half-life, things could get worse for the world's largest social network next year if it rolls out News Feed video ads.

According to AdAge, Facebook is in the final stages of developing an ad offering that will insert 15 second video ads into user News Feeds on the Facebook website and in the service's mobile apps. What's more: those video ads will play automatically, although it isn't yet clear whether sound will be enabled by default or not.

A risky proposition

Facebook's interest in video ads shouldn't come as a surprise. After all, while YouTube may be the 800 pound gorilla of video content on the social web, Facebook is the second most popular video destination on the web. But instead of focusing on something basic, like adding pre-roll ads to user-uploaded videos, Facebook is apparently planning to go all-in on the native advertising trend that has is sweeping the industry.

The good news: there's almost certainly money in the combination of native, social and video. The bad news: Facebook's News Feed video ad offering, as described, would arguably be the most invasive advertising the social network has injected into the Facebook experience.

The risk, obviously, is that users revolt. Although a full retreat from Facebook seems unlikely, the company must be careful about the impact of new ad offerings on user behavior. If ads -- particularly native ads that directly impact the core social networking experience -- push users to use Facebook less, or to use it differently than they do now, it could be bad news for Facebook.

And it could be bad news for Facebook advertisers. Many have demanded bigger and bolder ads, and while Facebook may finally be willing to oblige them, the risk for advertisers is that their hunger for Facebook eyeballs will eventually maim, if not kill, the goose that laid the golden egg.

Patricio Robles

Published 20 December, 2012 by Patricio Robles

Patricio Robles is a tech reporter at Econsultancy. Follow him on Twitter.

2405 more posts from this author

Comments (1)

Guy Cookson

Guy Cookson, CMO and Co-Founder at Respond Native Advertising Platform

Bigger and bolder ads don't work, as eye-tracking studies and rapidly falling display advertising CTRs demonstrate. The best solution is to treat users with respect and focus on developing formats that add value. When we developed Respond we looked not at how to interrupt users, but how to capture attention through placement, design and relevance.

over 3 years ago

Comment
No-profile-pic
Save or Cancel
Daily_pulse_signup_wide

Enjoying this article?

Get more just like this, delivered to your inbox.

Keep up to date with the latest analysis, inspiration and learning from the Econsultancy blog with our free Daily Pulse newsletter. Each weekday, you ll receive a hand-picked digest of the latest and greatest articles, as well as snippets of new market data, best practice guides and trends research.