Even if you had a spy in the heart of your competitor's e-commerce team, you might struggle to answer this question.

It's far from impossible that your competitors are neither appropriately recording their web traffic nor confident in which metrics to analyse.


The most common way to judge how popular someone else's site is to visit  Amazon-owned Alexa.com. The site, which recently had a re-design, shows charts for traffic rank, reach and page views. For example, E-consultancy's  charts show just how the traffic rises during the working week and drops for the weekend.

One of the most popular features of Alexa is the ability to plot the traffic charts of two or more websites in the same space.

The main drawback with Alexa is how this data is gathered. Amazon gives away Alexa and A9 toolbars for free, promising to block pop-ups, provide online bookmarks, offer quick access to search engines and the usual treats which branded toolbars offer.

Alexa then uses the toolbars to watch and record which sites are visited by the toolbar users. As a result, Alexa's metrics favour technical and geeky sites. When Alexa hit the headlines in Digg, Digg's own Alexa ranking dramatically increased as lots of Digg's users downloaded the toolbar.

Alexa does have an anti-spyware and anti-adware policy and the toolbar is not use to target you with adverts. However, Alexa was ahead of its time with this service and many anti-spyware and security systems will encourage users to delete or block Alexa cookies.


Compete will become a serious competitor to Alexa. It provides a similar service but has an annoying US centric view.

There are a number of areas which put Compete ahead of Alexa. It does not just rely on toolbar data. The service also buys data from ISPs (in a similar way to Hitwise), panel surveys and aggregates that into their toolbar data.

In addition, Compete offers 'Engagement' as a set of metrics by which you can examine a site. Engagement attempts to measure time spent on the domain as a percentage of the total time spent online by US internet users. We can see that E-consultancy's engagement has been rising.

Compete's blog adopts a similar approach to Hitwise's blogs and often reveals interesting snapshots, analysis and trends for free. I recommend it.


A little known corner of Netcraft is also dedicated to keeping track of popular domains. Once again a toolbar provides the information and Netcraft only tracks the top 100 sites in each country. Unless your competitor happens to be Google, the BBC or eBay, then Netcraft's offering is not likely to be detailed enough.

Netcraft, however, is good for insight in to how search positions could translate into traffic. We can see, for example, that Google DE is more popular  than Google UK (at least among Netcraft toolbar users) and so good organic Google DE rankings are certainly worth having.

You can also use Netcraft to see how web servers are holding up. The main purpose of Netcraft is to track servers rather than domains. If you suspect that a competitor's web server buckled under the pressure of extra traffic from a successful email broadcast about a special offer or a prominent Netscape link then Netcraft will confirm or correct your suspicion.

The Big Guns

Alexa, Compete and Netcraft's services are all free. There are a set of commercial offerings which should be looked at by any big brand that's serious about having a good idea about how much traffic competitors are getting.

I recommend all three. They're all ace. However, you'll need to be on good terms with your bank manager before you can justify subscribing to any two.

What Counts as Traffic?

As covered recently by E-consultancy, Nielson/NetRatings has dropped  "page views" as a metric good enough to be associated with safe headlines.

The problem it is seeking to address is the trend towards rich media (videos, podcasts, etc) and AJAX sites whose pages change and update to user requests without actually generating a new page view.

For example, go check out 192.com's funky map service. Zoom in and drag the map around until you find your office. You've just spent all that time on 192.com, played with the map but only generated one page view.

That's why Netratings has suggested that "time on the site" is a better metric and why Compete uses time as the key element of Engagement.

There are still significant problems, though. As Andy Beal astutely points out  - what about tabbed browsers like Firefox and Internet Explorer 7? The whole point of modern tabbed browsing is that you can be on a site without actually paying any attention to it. Right now, I've a Gmail tab open but I've not actually looked at my Gmail inbox since I started to write this blog post. Should Netratings and Compete count this time as Gmail time?

It is easier for us to measure our own web traffic meaningfully than it is for third party monitors like Alexa and Hitwise to do so.

In Google Analytics, for example, it is possible to create user-defined segments on the fly and associate them with clicks. If you wanted you could count every click on your AJAX map and cross reference that against the time those users spent on the site.


There is no easy way to work out just how much traffic your competitors enjoy on their sites. However, there are a number of ways you can roughly estimate the traffic trends your competitors are experiencing. It is worth keeping an eye on Alexa and Compete just in case a key competitor begins to soar or dive.

Andrew Girdwood is head of search at bigmouthmedia .

Andrew Girdwood

Published 12 July, 2007 by Andrew Girdwood

Andrew Girdwood is Head of Media Technologies at Signal and a guest blogger for Econsultancy. He can be found on Twitter here.

41 more posts from this author

You might be interested in

Comments (10)

Save or Cancel


In case you care: Google DE marketshare is in the regions of 80%.

about 11 years ago

Trevor Ginn

Trevor Ginn, Managing Director at Hello Baby


This is an excellent post, answering an question that I was thinking about just this morning. So your opinion is unless you subscribe to a service such as hitwise, whatever whatever other figure you come up with is going to be a very rough guess

about 11 years ago

Chris Lake

Chris Lake, CEO at Empirical Proof

Does Compete use only consumer ISP data?

If so then a B2B website like E-consultancy is always going to struggle to see an accurate picture. But I guess these things are good if you compare like for like, eg retail with retail, travel with travel, etc.

Ok for trends, but poor for absolute numbers.

about 11 years ago


Rob Urquhart, Head of Consulting, EMEA at OgilvyOne

I believe the query about tabbed browsers is not an issue with the Nielsen methodology as the software logs the time the page in the actvie window is in view.

about 11 years ago


Laurent Nicolas, Alenty

As R&D director at NetRatings (until early 2006), I was in charge of developping the measurement system (including the meter software installed by the panel members).
The issue raised in the article about the tabbed browsing is addressed (as far as I know, at least until early 2006) by the meter: time spent on a page is counted only when the page is visible and the user is active (mouse/keyboard usage). So, an opened Gmail tab is not measured...

At Alenty, we have developped the same level of fine time measurement (in a site-centric tool!) and we go even further to measure what is actually seen....

about 11 years ago


Garage Conversions

Its an interesting post and if their was a way to accurately measure another sites traffic I suppose you could track back their SEO techniques, Keywords

over 10 years ago


Search Engine Ranking

This kind of analysis is good however you must not become obsessed with what your competitor is doing.

over 8 years ago


Siju George

There is another tools to find the traffic of your comopetitor : quantcast

They shows the monthly traffic (estimate) of your competitor. But for small websites data is not accurate.

about 8 years ago



Does anyone know the best way to track sites with predominantly Middle Eastern traffic? Which tool would be best for comparing 2 Middle East sites?



about 8 years ago



I still can't find a good website that I can plug the url in to find out how many unique hits their getting. Does anyone know of any?

over 7 years ago

Save or Cancel

Enjoying this article?

Get more just like this, delivered to your inbox.

Keep up to date with the latest analysis, inspiration and learning from the Econsultancy blog with our free Digital Pulse newsletter. You will receive a hand-picked digest of the latest and greatest articles, as well as snippets of new market data, best practice guides and trends research.