Enter a search term such as “mobile analytics” or browse our content using the filters above.
That’s not only a poor Scrabble score but we also couldn’t find any results matching
Check your spelling or try broadening your search.
Sorry about this, there is a problem with our search at the moment.
Please try again later.
Anybody who knows about internet marketing probably wondered why a story about somebody using Google Adwords to bid on a brand name was such big news, myself included.
Google has a strict trademark policy and the ads were swiftly removed from terms such as "marks & spencers" and "m&s".
Here is what Google says about trademarks:
"When we receive a complaint from a trademark owner, our review is limited to ensuring that the advertisements at issue are not using a term corresponding to the trademarked term in the ad text or as a keyword trigger.
"If they are, we will require the advertiser to remove the trademarked term from the ad text or keyword list and will prevent the advertiser from using the trademarked term in the future."
This campaign was doomed to failure from the start and yet four major newspapers covered the story.
Unite is claiming the ads had "12,000 hits" in six hours but the number of people who actually clicked on the ads must be tiny.
Anybody searching for Marks & Spencer is probably a loyal follower wanting to visit the website and isn't likely to click on somebody else's advert.
It's clear that the Adwords campaign was a waste but the resulting publicity is priceless.