{{ searchResult.published_at | date:'d MMMM yyyy' }}

Loading ...
Loading ...

Enter a search term such as “mobile analytics” or browse our content using the filters above.


That’s not only a poor Scrabble score but we also couldn’t find any results matching “”.
Check your spelling or try broadening your search.


Sorry about this, there is a problem with our search at the moment.
Please try again later.

Flash sites can be a nightmare from a user experience perspective, so we were surprised by Google's decision this week to begin to indexing content from Flash files (SWF).

One major argument against the use of Flash has been that the major search engines have been unable to effectively index the content contained within these files, so websites using this software have been losing out in the search rankings.

But the main arguments are that Flash sites are often inaccessible and their architects often try to reinvent the wheel, which leads to all manner of user experience nightmares.

I talked to iCrossing's head of natural search Nilhan Jayasinghe to find out more about the development with Google, and why - like us - he believes that using Flash is still a bad idea from an SEO perspective...


Why has Google decided to index Flash content?

Google wants to index as much content as possible, and the problem has been that it hasn't been good at reading SWF files. If Flash files don't have the HTML tags that 'normal' websites have, Google cannot compare those elements.


Will sites using this software now begin to rank higher than non-Flash sites?

The only time you are likely to see this is if a Flash based website has a ranking based on a high number of incoming links. Car manufacturers, including BMW, tend to use a lot of Flash and these sites rank well because they are popular brands.  

Google looks at a number of factors, including deep links, textual navigation and internal linking structure so unless it discards these parts of its algorithm then Flash sites will always struggle to rank better than 'normal' websites.


Will this be a green light for web developers to use more Flash?

My first concern is that a lot of creative agencies are now going to use this to persuade clients to build expensive Flash websites. There are alternatives which can do most of what Flash does, but remain indexable, such as Silverlight.  


Is this a bad from a user experience perspective?

You may find a Flash site that matches your search term on Google, but unless the file is split into unique URL sections, then clicking on the result will just take you to the beginning of the file, not the part that matches your query.

Mobile users accessing the internet from their phones cannot access Flash websites, so companies may be missing out on a growing mobile audience.


What would you recommend to clients using Flash on their websites?

We have a large web development arm in the US, and we use Flash very sparingly, using it to present rich media content, and making sure that the majority of the site is in HTML.

For websites that already have Flash content, this is good news, as they will be ranking better than before, but I would not recommend it for a brand new site. If Flash is used well, it shouldn't have any text in it.


Greenlight CEO Warren Cowan has a similar take on the issue:

First things first, this isn’t entirely new;  Google has been able to access Flash files in a limited capacity for several years, as has Yahoo.  Having said that this is a clear step up for Google and it will undoubtedly impact on what we do in the future.

Don’t expect Flash sites to start dominating natural search rankings anytime soon.  Being able to access content isn’t the be all and end all of SEO.  Among other things we’re also concerned with what’s being accessed and what isn’t, and how that content is structured, both in isolation and within the context of the site as a whole. 

For example, one of the worst things you can do to a site is built it entirely on a single URL, a trap that full Flash sites fall into all too often.  This eradicates any semblance of structure and makes it impossible to link to specific content within the site.

The fear here is that Google’s announcement will give the green light to Flash designers who, knowing no better, will now see – and probably advertise - their work as “search engine friendly” when in all likelihood it’s anything but.


Related stories:
Reasons to avoid Flash on your website
Nike to kick the Flash habit? 

Graham Charlton

Published 4 July, 2008 by Graham Charlton

Graham Charlton is the former Editor-in-Chief at Econsultancy. Follow him on Twitter or connect via Linkedin or Google+

2565 more posts from this author

Comments (7)

Save or Cancel

Richard Hartigan

I agree with the consensus of opinion above. Just because Google can access content doesn't necessarily mean that it will rank it well. It has previously been announced that Google can access content via dynamic URL's. I know a lot of companies to whom this was somewhat of a relief. Even now though, they are struggling to gain any traction in the SERPs.

The advice is clear. Continue to build search engine friendly websites.

almost 9 years ago


Pravish Thomas

Yeah its very much true as described,,,,,,,

Flash sites even if its indexed it dosen't mean that it would get higher rankings.
Becz the issues of javascript isn't solved. And regarding the URL linking structure too.

In short we can say Google has just started it needs to seen in the coming years.

almost 9 years ago


Kieran Hawe

I agree that a concern would be agencies trying to push expensive flash designs now that SEO is "not" a concern. In the end a site needs to be built with core UX in mind, SEO best practices should be implemented whenever possible. For me, google indexing SWF files hasnt changed much.

almost 9 years ago

Timothy Roberts

Timothy Roberts, Chairman at I-COM

The biggest issue will be the one discussed of landing pages, users are looking to get to specific content more quickly. Even if the swf files are searchable users will still be forced to land at the start point of the site and not directly on relevant content pages.

almost 9 years ago



Google are trying to index all sorts of types of content, I would imagine that this sits alongside 'Video search' as something that is probably never really going to be done that accurately - but I would love to be proved wrong.

It would be really interesting to see how Google weights a quality, branded, flash-driven site against a well-optimised affiliate site.

almost 9 years ago


Chris Flatt

On the surface this is really great news. The main benefit I can see from an SEM point of view is the end of flash sites being redesigned with static pages that look awful. Watch this space...

almost 9 years ago



Do we really need flash site at all? Its a bit old fashioned when there are far better ways to build a good website. Is it worth having an amazing looking flash site if Google does want to know. Thanks for the good read.

about 6 years ago

Save or Cancel

Enjoying this article?

Get more just like this, delivered to your inbox.

Keep up to date with the latest analysis, inspiration and learning from the Econsultancy blog with our free Daily Pulse newsletter. Each weekday, you ll receive a hand-picked digest of the latest and greatest articles, as well as snippets of new market data, best practice guides and trends research.