{{ searchResult.published_at | date:'d MMMM yyyy' }}

Loading ...
Loading ...

Enter a search term such as “mobile analytics” or browse our content using the filters above.

No_results

That’s not only a poor Scrabble score but we also couldn’t find any results matching “”.
Check your spelling or try broadening your search.

Logo_distressed

Sorry about this, there is a problem with our search at the moment.
Please try again later.

Billions of dollars in market cap. Gone. In minutes.

It wouldn't be surprising to learn of Apple shareholder heart attacks after a rumor that Apple CEO Steve Jobs suffered a massive one resulted in a quick but rapid drop in Apple's stock price last Friday.

The rumor, of course, was just that - a rumor. A false one. And like most that turn out to be untrue, this rumor has an interesting story.

Early last Friday, an as-yet-unidentified "citizen journalist" who the Securities and Exchange Commission is now looking for posted the rumor on iReport.com, a service run by CNN that bears the tagline "Unedited. Unfiltered. News."

The first two words are certainly not in question; the latter certainly is.

Of course, the iReport.com website notes:

"The views and content on this site are solely those of the iReport.com contributors. CNN makes no guarantees about the content or the coverage on iReport.com!"

Yet in the case of the bogus rumor of Jobs' heart attack, the CNN-owned iReport.com served as an ideal distribution platform for the as yet unidentified rumormonger whose motives are unknown.

The rumor was spotted by Henry Blodget's Silicon Alley Insider (yes, that Henry Blodget), who added to its distribution.

Instead of waiting to contact Apple in an attempt to verify that the rumor was indeed true, Blodget decided to post the rumor with a disclaimer that it had not been verified.

Some, such as Arnold Kim of MacRumors.com, believe it was actually Blodget's post that resulted in the sudden drop in Apple's share price.

In defending his decision, Blodget told News.com:

"We never know how long it will take to confirm or reject information like that, and we knew our readers would want to evaluate it themselves. So we described exactly what the report was, said we didn't know whether it was true or not, and said we were investigating."

Obviously, everyone involved is pointing fingers at someone else. So just who is to "blame"?

In my opinion, everyone.

As mainstream media outlets like CNN work to harvest the potentially valuable contributions of "citizen journalists" through services like iReport.com, they also provide credible-looking distribution platforms to pranksters and scammers.

Yet it's quite clear that CNN didn't think about the consequences of putting its brand behind an "unfiltered" service like iReport.com. Other media companies, such as CBS, are learning the hard way as well.

Popular bloggers like Blodget, in an effort to be "first" (as opposed to "right"), often promulgate worthless information (i.e. rumors). In this case, Blodget naively (or disingenuously) believed that posting a disclaimer that the Jobs rumor was unsubstantiated was a sufficient journalistic measure.

This despite the fact that other blogs, including MacRumors.com, had enough common sense to not post the rumor even though it was sent to them too.

And finally, the increasing number of individuals who seem ill-equipped to critically evaluate information and who are clearly so easily manipulated that they'll make decisions with their money based on blatantly questionable information certainly need to accept some responsibility.

In other words, there's plenty of blame to go around and no one individual or company is wholly responsible for last Friday's fiasco.

One thing is for sure, however - citizen journalism has received a black eye.

This incident will not cause CNN to shutter iReport.com and it won't stop bloggers like Blodget from posting rumors, but it has already forced some who are actively involved in the worlds of "citizen journalism" and blogging to recognize that there are real problems when raw information and speed are valued over accurate, filtered information.

At the end of the day, it's my hope that the fake report of Steve Jobs' heart attack will help promote more "common sense" amongst citizen journalists and bloggers because I certainly doubt it will promote more "common sense" amongst individuals.

Drama 2.0

Published 8 October, 2008 by Drama 2.0

237 more posts from this author

Comments (2)

Avatar-blank-50x50

Sam B

Perhaps while they're looking for the original culprit, the SEC should impose some sort of sanction on Henry Blodget for helping to fiddle with the market in this way. Maybe ban him for life from the securities industry. Oh wait.

almost 8 years ago

Avatar-blank-50x50

JS

Analysts are to blame. If any anonymous idiot can post a lie in a forum & manipulate the stocks price. Then these people are making way too much money for absolutely nothing. If it is that easy to rig the game then the whole thing is a scam & the people that are supposed to be trusted are in on it.

almost 8 years ago

Comment
No-profile-pic
Save or Cancel
Daily_pulse_signup_wide

Enjoying this article?

Get more just like this, delivered to your inbox.

Keep up to date with the latest analysis, inspiration and learning from the Econsultancy blog with our free Daily Pulse newsletter. Each weekday, you ll receive a hand-picked digest of the latest and greatest articles, as well as snippets of new market data, best practice guides and trends research.