I haven't exactly been a big fan of YouTube (and its parent, Google) but there are signs it is moving in the right direction.

On Tuesday, Google announced on the YouTube blog that it would be adding "click-to-buy" links on the pages of videos owned by the site's partners.

These links enable users to purchase content related to the videos they watch via iTunes and Amazon.com, and finally takes YouTube down the path that other online media destinations such as IMEEM have already gone down.

According to YouTube's blog post:

"This is just the beginning of building a broad, viable eCommerce platform for users and partners on YouTube. Our vision is to help partners across all industries -- from music, to film, to print, to TV -- offer useful and relevant products to a large, yet targeted audience, and generate additional revenue from their content on YouTube beyond the advertising we serve against their videos."

Whether this announcement was driven by Google's urgent mission to monetize YouTube or by its realization that it was in its best interests to deal more amicably with content owners, one thing is clear - Google is starting to take the right approach.

While it remains to be seen just how much business YouTube will actually drive for iTunes and Amazon.com and how much revenue it will generate for itself and its partners, the bigger implication is that Google seems to recognize that ecommerce may be just as important to YouTube as brand advertising is.

Selling brand advertising has been a challenge for Google because of YouTube's vast library of user-generated content - content that is not very attractive to many, if not most, advertisers.

Given economic conditions, over-reliance on brand advertising is a risky proposition for any online business.

YouTube's "click-to-buy" links potentially do two things:

  • Serve as a simple first-step for a much-needed ecommerce strategy.
  • Provide another means of monetization that doesn't require Google to fight the perceptions brand advertisers have when it comes to user-generated content.

In the future, I believe YouTube would be wise to experiment with its own ecommerce platform like it once offered with the seemingly forgotten Google Video.

By enabling its partners to sell content directly on YouTube, Google would not only be able to provide a more seamless user experience that minimizes the number of users that it has to send off to Apple and Amazon.com, it would be able to retain a greater share of the revenues.

While the margins from on-property video sales would still probably be quite low, given YouTube's audience, there's no reason Google shouldn't leverage the YouTube platform to its fullest.

The question, of course, is whether Google will. One of my biggest criticisms of the company is its passive approach to its non-search products, which I believe has been a major contributor to the fact that most of its products outside of search are relative "failures."

Google's culture is engineering-driven. The company believes that computers can solve most problems and that technology-based solutions are superior.

Yet YouTube appears to be forcing Google to take a different approach because YouTube is, after all, a media property. For Google to take full advantage of YouTube and to keep online services like Hulu from taking advantage of the void Google didn't move to fill, Google needs to be proactive and it will need to go beyond simple "click-to-buy" links.

That said, this new initiative is the latest sign that Google may be getting its act together on YouTube. At the very least, it has finally implemented a "no brainer" that catches it up to the rest of the market. That's certainly a positive thing.

Drama 2.0

Published 9 October, 2008 by Drama 2.0

237 more posts from this author

You might be interested in

Comments (2)


Hessie Jones

Hey there, I absolutely agree with your comments. Everyone's always trying to find that holy grail to monetize social media spaces. Traffic, for the most part, shouldn't be the only function of a company's valuation. The ability to make money should always be there. The very nature of social networks is these are places go to, in some respects, flee the plethora of advertising and engage in meaningful dialogue about topics of interest. It's only natural that as they've reached a tipping point then advertisers want to be where the action is. User-generated content, good or bad, will not cease. Youtube and Google will have to figure out what to do with what they've got and determine the best way to monetize that stuff that's appealing to both the user and the advertiser. They've made some pretty good attempts and this one is ok, at best. But now, how do they make it available to many more advertisers without pissing off the users?

almost 10 years ago



Hello, many thanks for a awfully enjoyable blog, I really don't generally submit remarks but valued your blog post hence felt I would say thank you so much : Faith

about 6 years ago

Save or Cancel

Enjoying this article?

Get more just like this, delivered to your inbox.

Keep up to date with the latest analysis, inspiration and learning from the Econsultancy blog with our free Digital Pulse newsletter. You will receive a hand-picked digest of the latest and greatest articles, as well as snippets of new market data, best practice guides and trends research.