There was an interesting post yesterday on TechCrunch about the use of Google Trends to drive editorial.

Apparently, a number of publishers are leveraging the data from Google Trends to find hot keyword trends, and taking advantage of the blazing speed at which Google spiders new content on blogs and content sites to produce content catered specifically to those hot keywords.

There are anecdotal reports that some publishers are driving substantial amounts of traffic using this technique.

Of course, there is some debate as to whether or not this technique is appropriate or "ethical."

This got me thinking and I decided to weigh the pros and cons.


  • Google Trends enables publishers to find hot topics that may be timely to address.
  • Determining what your audience is interested in today is often a difficult task for publishers so Google Trends can help deal with this challenge.
  • What publisher can ignore the appeal of lots of traffic from Google?


  • Producing content solely to take advantage of keywords can lead to uninspired, poorly-written content.
  • Just because a trend is hot doesn't mean a publisher has anything interesting to say about it. This might lead a publisher to simply regurgitate content from elsewhere.
  • It's easy to get carried away. While it's great to piggyback on hot topics, basing editorial decisions around Google Trends in the extreme can distract from producing good, authentic and original content.

So what should publishers do?

In my opinion, there's nothing inherently wrong with using Google Trends to stay in touch with what's topical.

But some common sense should be applied:

  • Quality still counts and publishers cannot sacrifice quality - no where the inspiration for content comes from. After all, quality is usually the most important contributor to a publisher's brand.
  • Value needs to be added. If a publisher brings nothing of value to the table (exclusive information, a different perspective, unique insight, etc.), he or she should think twice about posting content just to take advantage of this technique.
  • Pick and choose. Using Google Trends on a daily basis to drive editorial is probably not a good idea. Instead, publishers should pick and choose their spots, taking advantage of hot topics only when those topics fit in with what they're already producing.

I'd love to hear from publishers using this technique or publishers who decide implement it. Feel free to leave your comments.


Published 10 October, 2008 by Patrick Oak

82 more posts from this author

You might be interested in

Comments (2)

Dave Chaffey

Dave Chaffey, Digital Marketing Consultant, Trainer, Author and Speaker at

Yes Patrick, it's a powerful tool, particularly for seasonal demand for products or editorial topics.

I was surprised the Tech Crunch article didn't mention the two Google tools launched this year, i.e.g Google Trends for Websites or Google Insights for Search which is very similar. It's also powerful for understanding trends in different markets which is what i'm working on at the moment for a client.

Here is an example from Google Insights for Search about the recession - it seems the PO is doing well

Dave Chaffey
Internet Marketing Author, Trainer and Consultant

almost 10 years ago



It's worth bearing in mind that the Google (hot) Trends data is US orientated. So if you're a generic site, particularly in the entertainment or political field, then you can make some hay from this, but if not it doesn't really provide an awful lot for you to go on.

almost 10 years ago

Save or Cancel

Enjoying this article?

Get more just like this, delivered to your inbox.

Keep up to date with the latest analysis, inspiration and learning from the Econsultancy blog with our free Digital Pulse newsletter. You will receive a hand-picked digest of the latest and greatest articles, as well as snippets of new market data, best practice guides and trends research.