Google News publishers know all about the wonders and horrors of First Click Free.

Google News wants to include prestigious newspapers and let users click through to the stories which matched keyword searches.

Some newspapers still want to operate on a subscription model. 

First Click Free for News is a method whereby Google gets access to the full content of publishers' news stories, getting to peer through a pay wall/subscription page and where Google News users get to read the first story they click to for free.

After the first story the reader is challenged for a subscription.

There are pros and cons to First Click Free. One big pro is that the green (subscription) warning beside the story headline in Google News vanishes and so traffic surges upwards as a result.

One con is that savvy readers can abuse the system to read a lot more than just one story for free.

In October, Google rolled out First Click Free for Web Search. This takes the First Click Free for News and applies it to the normal search results.

This means a wider range of sites which might not be eligible for Google News but which may desire a subscription model can allow Google to ethically see and index all their content, let users peak at the content but then fall back on subscription model.

Sites that provide diets, recipes, poems, gossip, transcripts, lyrics, sport predictions, satirical news, daily jokes, etc, might all benefit from First Click Free for Web Search. These sites would opt-in to Google's First Click Free for Web Search by being willing to write off their Yahoo and MSN Live traffic.

There may well be many sites in the UK willing to do put all their search eggs in Google's basket but social media traffic should also be considered.

Many URLs are passed around via Twitter, Facebook, StumbleUpon, Digg and their clones. In fact these sites are a good method of ‘social discovery' and often play a key role in introducing quality content to a wider audience of social media participants.

Only time will tell whether content sites opt into First Click Free for Web Search, enjoy the revenue stream from a subscription model and Google traffic but sacrifice Yahoo, MSN and social media traffic in return, or whether content sites keep their pay walls down. 

Andrew Girdwood is Head of Search for bigmouthmedia .


The views of the author do not necessarily represent those of the publisher.

Andrew Girdwood

Published 11 November, 2008 by Andrew Girdwood

Andrew Girdwood is Head of Media Technologies at Signal and a guest blogger for Econsultancy. He can be found on Twitter here.

41 more posts from this author

You might be interested in

Comments (3)



Bit of a conundrum isn't it. From a consumer point of view it's a good thing as you get more content for free. From a publisher point of view however Google really is yielding a whole lot of influence over the industry purely because of the traffic volumes they can send. Obviously Google benefits from publishers scrapping subscriptions and following an ad supported model, and whilst I'm not suggesting that this is an attempt to force such a change it's easy to see how the dots could be joined.

almost 10 years ago



Why would this force a site to give up traffic from other search engines exactly? There's nothing to stop publishers from allowing other search crawlers through and then allowing visitors referred from those search engines' results pages.

over 9 years ago

Andrew Girdwood

Andrew Girdwood, Head of Media Technology at Signal

Most search engines would probably consider that cloaking Kevin. They dislike sites that show the crawler one version of the page and the users a different one.

over 9 years ago

Save or Cancel

Enjoying this article?

Get more just like this, delivered to your inbox.

Keep up to date with the latest analysis, inspiration and learning from the Econsultancy blog with our free Digital Pulse newsletter. You will receive a hand-picked digest of the latest and greatest articles, as well as snippets of new market data, best practice guides and trends research.