slow bloggingRecently, an underground rethinking of blogging practice began to hit the headlines; that of Slow Blogging. In a nutshell, this is where blog-posts are generated over a length of time with the aim to display a deep knowledge of the subject matter, rather than churning out quick content at a regular pace.

Displaying a thorough understanding of their services, products and industry can be highly beneficial to the promotional and marketing activities of many businesses, but at what speed should we really be blogging?

The original Slow Blog Manifesto was created back in 2006 by Todd Sieling, a technology consultant from Vancouver, who wrote that:

 Slow Blogging is a rejection of immediacy... An affirmation that not all things worth reading are written quickly.

Over time, this notion has been picked up across the internet and more recently, brought to mainstream attention, online and offline, by the likes of the Guardian and the New York Times.

Firstly, I have a slight issue with the idea that there are only two speeds of blogging. It’s not necessarily a hare and tortoise race, although blogs can be loosely separated into two different areas, in terms of content generation. Some posts require commitment to sourcing comments, researching and editing, whereas others are short insights, breaking news or quick opinions that need to catch a user’s attention. Unsurprisingly, there’s no official industry rule as to how long any of this can take in terms of posting online.

What is becoming clearer, however, is that the likes of Twitter, Jaiku and, to a lesser extent, sites like FriendFeed and Tumblr, are all aiding the speed at which content is pushed out into the web. With content spreading so rapidly through these so-called ‘microblogs’, it can result in huge volumes of traffic being driven to a website or static blog.

I wouldn’t exactly claim that these tools are destroying blogging. Instead I am very much of the opinion that they are evolving the blog landscape. Econsultancy’s fourth biggest referrer of traffic is Twitter, which is impressive, especially when you consider the figures involved, and much of this lands directly on our main blog content.

For me, the second issue lies with how it can be construed that blogging slowly (albeit thoroughly), can possibly have a positive effect on SEO ranking. As anyone with the slightest understanding of how search engines work will tell you, blogs can often be extremely beneficial for helping to boost SEO rankings. Interestingly, what is often unnoticed by those interested in blogging at a snail’s pace for commercial purposes is that Section 5 of the original manifesto recognises this:

Slow Blogging is a response to and a rejection of Pagerank. Pagerank, the ugly-beautiful monster that sits behind the many folded curtains of Google, deciding the question of authority and relevance to your searches. Blog early, blog often, and Google will reward you. Condition your creative self to the secret frequency, and find yourself adored by Google; you will appear where everybody looks - in the first few pages of results. Follow your own pace and find your works never found; refuse Pagerank its favours and your work is pulled as if by riptide into the deep waters of undifferentiated results.

So, Slow Blogging, as a concept, really is “a rejection of immediacy”, which is bad news for direct marketers who are seriously considering this as an approach to boosting their SEO activity. If you’re dedicated to posting on a frequent basis, then you will be ranked quickly and more highly, depending on a few other factors, such as content quality, it doesn’t overly depend on how much thought and time you’ve given a blog, as the likes of Google won’t ever understand your personal pains in achieving a Man Booker-winning, word-perfect textual work of art.

That’s not to say content isn’t important. I raised the important issue of good copywriting a while ago, and the facts still haven’t changed: Research repeatedly shows that web pages following best practice for online copywriting out-perform those that aren’t by over 100%; a great proportion of which is attributed to natural search ranking.

Ideally, it’s the freshness (and relevance) of content the search engines are looking for, and as most people know, this is a lot easier to manage through blogging, rather than constantly updating and changing the text on a website.

Surprisingly, one of the most overlooked tactics of using a blog is that once a search engine recognises regular content updates, links to other sites or sub-domains can be tactically added which are then crawled. Whilst measurements are in place by the likes of Google to prevent the sneaky tactic of multiple link-posting, formatting a blog to have a few permanent links in the side-bar or header can have a noticeably positive impact. Falling back on copywriting, I’m always surprised by the number of people who fail to realise that a blog can be optimised, which can have enormous benefits on SEO.

But this steers us away from ideas of speed. I’m very much of the belief that blogging slowly and spending time creating single posts over days or even weeks has no real SEO value. The odds of being caught long or short-tail on a blog that’s being updated once a week is extremely thin. Anything more than that, then the odds are likely to become almost non-existent.

There is nothing wrong with being a slow writer who thoroughly does their research and puts together some great content, but posting this content at a slow pace is far from being best practice. The main objective of a blog is to convey a message or opinion and I think it’s very fair to say that by ensuring you are consistently producing good quality, relevant blog content, then you should begin to experience an improvement in search engine results and an increased understanding amongst users about your business.

Jake Hird

Published 11 February, 2009 by Jake Hird

Jake Hird is Econsultancy Australia's Director of Research and Education. Follow him on Twitter and Google+, connect with him on LinkedIn or see what he's keeping an eye on via diigo

126 more posts from this author

You might be interested in

Comments (6)

Save or Cancel


I've faced this confict myself. 

I've always taken the view that I would rather express my opinions less often but have something interesting and meaningful so say that people may want to read.

over 9 years ago



Ordinarily I would agree, but arguably the highest quality blog I read is Occam's Razor by Avinash Kaushik.  Pretty much all of his posts are well worth reading but he doesn't post very often, once a week is perhaps on the generous side.  I suspect however that he still enjoys very high status within the analytics community and his blog hasn't suffered from this approach.

Of course that may be the exception rather than the rule as most of the blogs I follow do post more regularly than this.

over 9 years ago


Mike Teasdale

Good post!  

Totally agree with the comment above that Occam's Razor is a great example of a 'slow blog'.  But I'm not sure you're right in the argument that frequency of posting helps page rank - my sense is that one well-argued, well-researched, authoritative posting will in time do better from an SEO point of view than 100 churned out posts.

Occam's Razor has a page rank of five - one better than my blog, which frankly is infinitely worse.  The difference is that many of the individual postings on Avinash's blog maintain a page rank of four or five, whereas my posts tend to hover rather modestly around the zero mark!

Personally I'd much rather follow a blog where the author is waiting until he has interesting things to say.

over 9 years ago

Doug Kessler

Doug Kessler, Director at VelocitySmall Business Multi-user

I'm in.

Anything that slows this thing down can't be bad.

Less is more (more or less).

over 9 years ago

Jake Hird

Jake Hird, Director of Research and Education at Econsultancy

Thanks for the comments so far, guys.

I'm sure that there are bloggers out there who post at a relatively slow rate and still see good SEO; however, I'm taking a more generic, broad approach to the concepts I mentioned.

It still doesn't remove the fact that a lot of businesses, who are trying to increase their online presence, fail to understand how blogging can have a place in this. Some dismiss blogging altogether, which I personally think is a a bit naive; not just for SEO reasons, but also the issues I touched upon about engaging with users and showing understanding, reactions and opions of the industry their business sits in.

I think this highlights the original point I was trying to make: That there are no specific industry guidelines about this and you need to find your own balance as to what works best for you.

over 9 years ago



What's amazing to me is the presumption that anything here represents anything new or insightful. There is virtually no difference here between a real-life social context in which some people speak up often (possibly forming ideas as they speak), and those who take their time (maybe to formulate their thoughts) and speak less often.

Some people who speak frequently are still fascinating, but these are the minority. Most of us, if we're going to have useful input to a conversation and not just spew forth with ideas we had pre-formed, are going to require a bit more time. Others will take even longer, and may appear to be completely disconnected until, after a long period, bring forth comments and insights that others simply never considered. These people, in my experience, are the most interesting ones to listen to, and tend to take the time to present their thoughts in the most interesting and entertaining ways.

So, pay attention to SEO (or other metrics that I find similarly useless) all you want. It's the beauty contest of worth for many companies. As for me, I'm inclined to worry about having something useful to say, and will go ahead and labor over posts for days or weeks, trying to capture the presentation that I'm after. The rush to be first rarely rewards the victor with long-term success. - Tim

P.S. Given the conclusions of this article, I'm inclined to think that you wrote it quickly, without giving it too much thought. I suppose that's the definition of irony.

over 9 years ago

Save or Cancel

Enjoying this article?

Get more just like this, delivered to your inbox.

Keep up to date with the latest analysis, inspiration and learning from the Econsultancy blog with our free Digital Pulse newsletter. You will receive a hand-picked digest of the latest and greatest articles, as well as snippets of new market data, best practice guides and trends research.