{{ searchResult.published_at | date:'d MMMM yyyy' }}

Loading ...
Loading ...

Enter a search term such as “mobile analytics” or browse our content using the filters above.

No_results

That’s not only a poor Scrabble score but we also couldn’t find any results matching “”.
Check your spelling or try broadening your search.

Logo_distressed

Sorry about this, there is a problem with our search at the moment.
Please try again later.

Duplicate content is one of those SEO issues that can be a real pain to deal with. While Google says it doesn't 'penalize' duplicate content unless the duplicate content is clearly the result of malicious behavior, that doesn't stop webmasters and SEOs from worrying about it.

While such worries may be overblown, there are legitimate reasons why duplicate content can become problematic.

Fortunately, Google, Yahoo and Microsoft have come together and agreed to respect a 'canonical tag' that enables webmasters to specify the canonical, or original, URL of the page.

The best part: implementing this tag is easy. By placing the following tag between the <head></head> tags, search engines will know what the canonical URL is:

<link rel="canonical" href="http://www.yourwebsite.com/some-page" />

So, for instance, if you have a page, http://www.yourwebsite.com/product-name/ whose content is also accessible through http://www.yourwebsite.com/new-products/product-name/ and http://www.yourwebsite.com/featured-products/product-name/, adding <link rel="canonical" href="http://www.yourwebsite.com/product-name" /> between the head tags on the pages that contain the duplicate content will ensure that the major search engines know which page is the original.

In the case of Google, PageRank and other juice-carrying characteristics are transferred to the page specified in the canonical URL.

While the use of canonical tags is not required and is not a directive, it's a hint that Google says it will "honor strongly".

Other Google-specific details:

  • Both relative and absolute paths can be used.
  • Content does not need to be 100% duplicate. Google understands that there may be slight differences between pages.
  • Canonical tags can point to a URL that is a redirect. Google will try to follow the redirect as it normally would.
  • Google is "lenient" when it comes to contradictory canonical tags but suggests that all tags be consistent for best results.
  • Canonical tags can be used to point to URLs on a subdomain but Google will not respect canonical tags pointing to a different domain.

The fact that Google, Yahoo and Microsoft have all accepted the use of the canonical tag (a relatively rare occurrence), if your website has duplicate content issues, putting this to use looks to be worthwhile.

Patricio Robles

Published 13 February, 2009 by Patricio Robles

Patricio Robles is a tech reporter at Econsultancy. Follow him on Twitter.

2393 more posts from this author

Comments (2)

Avatar-blank-50x50

Sean

Good news for the weekend, i guess its time to relax for all the ecommerce website owners

over 7 years ago

Avatar-blank-50x50

introspective

I used to publish my articles, but now I wander should I stop doing this, because the risk of duplicate content penalty. Should I stop publish my articles on article directories?

about 7 years ago

Comment
No-profile-pic
Save or Cancel
Daily_pulse_signup_wide

Enjoying this article?

Get more just like this, delivered to your inbox.

Keep up to date with the latest analysis, inspiration and learning from the Econsultancy blog with our free Daily Pulse newsletter. Each weekday, you ll receive a hand-picked digest of the latest and greatest articles, as well as snippets of new market data, best practice guides and trends research.