{{ searchResult.published_at | date:'d MMMM yyyy' }}

Loading ...
Loading ...

Enter a search term such as “mobile analytics” or browse our content using the filters above.

No_results

That’s not only a poor Scrabble score but we also couldn’t find any results matching “”.
Check your spelling or try broadening your search.

Logo_distressed

Sorry about this, there is a problem with our search at the moment.
Please try again later.

That the newspaper business is ailing isn't exactly news. With some newspapers closing altogether and others doing what they can to deal with still-declining revenue, it's clear that the newspaper industry needs to adapt.

The internet is increasingly the medium that newspapers are turning to as they try to adapt but it's not a quick fix.

Newspapers not only need to find ways to cut operating costs while maintaining quality, they have to come up with completely new business models.

This is perhaps the biggest challenge newspapers face. With advertising looking like a shaky source of revenue given the economic climate, newspapers are increasingly looking at paid content.

But as I mentioned before, paid content isn't going to be a panacea. Take the New York Times for instance. It once charged for content and then decided that free was the way to go. If it decides to charge once again, it's likely that the Times will find going from free to paid to be a hard sell, especially having already gone from paid to free when times were better.

But The New York Times isn't the only newspaper grappling with finding the perfect business model.

Now Hearst Corp. is looking to charge for some of its content.

According to an internal memo from Hearst newspapers president Steven Swartz:

Exactly how much paid content to hold back from our free sites will be a judgment call made daily by our management, whose mission should be to run the best free Web sites in our markets without compromising our ability to get a fair price from consumers for the expensive, unique reporting and writing that we produce each day.

What is a 'fair price'? That obviously depends on what Hearst Corp. is offering.

And that's where I think the problems begin. This isn't just about the medium (web versus print); it's about the content.

There are so many options out there and so much news content has been commoditized that I believe average newspapers (especially local dailies) are going to have a hard time getting people to open up their wallets.

So what should newspapers do? I think they have to do what every online publisher does: figure out where the value is.

In the case of the average newspaper, I don't think news content is enough. They have to provide more value if they want consumers to pay. Like what? I'm not sure. Perhaps it's access to special deals and coupons from local businesses. Perhaps it's delivery of news on devices like the iPhone and Kindle, which Hearst is considering.

Whatever the case, I think Hearst's Swartz missed the point when he wrote:

We must continue to ask readers to pay more for their subscriptions. Our print subscribers don’t pay us enough today that we can say they are actually paying for content. Rather, we only ask readers to pay for a portion of the cost of printing the paper on newsprint and delivering it to the reader’s doorstep. We must gradually, but persistently, change this practice. We ask our readers to pay for their subscriptions on the Kindle today, and we must begin doing the same thing on the iPhone and other advanced smart phones and reading devices that allow us to create a user experience worth paying for.

He might be right (that consumers aren't paying enough) but try telling that to them. When you want to charge for something that has been free (or charge more for something that you feel you've been undercharging for), explanations about cost and 'better user experiences' rarely alone cut it.

Patricio Robles

Published 2 March, 2009 by Patricio Robles

Patricio Robles is a tech reporter at Econsultancy. Follow him on Twitter.

2403 more posts from this author

Comments (1)

Avatar-blank-50x50

Craig

Jeff Bezos said in a conversation with Piers Morgan that in 5 years there would be no more print newspapers.  Which would seem to confirm what Marc Andreesen also said recently.

Shame, of course, that Bezos and Morgan spoke in 2000, and Kindle (his replacement for the printed word) is only now a (very niche) reality...

One day print will cease to become an effective medium, but it will be after we are all dead. Of course that won't stop the Newspaper Sector from having a bad time of it just now.  Especially, the regional titles that don't have the reach, budget, or even the gravitas to remain relevant - indeed, Douglas Fraser is discussing the future of regional press in the context of Scotland on the Beeb today (http://www.bbc.co.uk/blogs/thereporters/douglasfraser/). 

Bloggers, tweeters or "online publishers" shouldn't necessarily count on being the beneficiaries mind...

over 7 years ago

Comment
No-profile-pic
Save or Cancel
Daily_pulse_signup_wide

Enjoying this article?

Get more just like this, delivered to your inbox.

Keep up to date with the latest analysis, inspiration and learning from the Econsultancy blog with our free Daily Pulse newsletter. Each weekday, you ll receive a hand-picked digest of the latest and greatest articles, as well as snippets of new market data, best practice guides and trends research.