{{ searchResult.published_at | date:'d MMMM yyyy' }}

Loading ...
Loading ...

Enter a search term such as “mobile analytics” or browse our content using the filters above.


That’s not only a poor Scrabble score but we also couldn’t find any results matching “”.
Check your spelling or try broadening your search.


Sorry about this, there is a problem with our search at the moment.
Please try again later.

An article in the FT this week attempted to cast some light on the most influential blogs in the UK and Europe, though the methodology used to calculate the blog rankings leaves a little to be desired.

The piece was based on a study conducted by blog search engine Technorati and Edelman, the PR firm, but instead of using traditional metrics such as reach and audience share, it used the number of inbound links to determine a blog’s ‘influence’.

So what’s wrong with that?

Well, firstly it is certainly a case of grabbing the lowest hanging fruit. Technorati publishes a list of the ‘top 100 blogs’, using inbound links as the basis for positioning. Edelman, for the record, has an exclusive and slightly mysterious deal with Technorati, to drill down into its data across multiple territories.

One of the biggest issues with Technorati is the sheer number of spam blogs (aka splogs) which populate its listings. Splogs, more often than not, tend to automatically suck up content from RSS feeds and republish along with a link to the original article. A cheap link. Quantity, it seems, beats quality. Should splog links really boost a blog’s ‘influence’? I think not.

The other issue with link-based methodology is that blog networks, such as Weblogs Inc, consistently link to their own stable of websites every time a new post is published (just look in the right-hand sidebar of Autoblog to see what I mean). A new page, a bunch of new links… sort of link nepotism. There’s nothing wrong with this of course, but I'm guessing that it helps boost ‘influence’ rankings. The rich get richer, buddy.

Finally, and somewhat obviously, the longer a blog has been online the more links it is likely to have. So influence might simply be a synonym for ‘been around a while’. It figures, but when you listen to what Hugh 'Gapingvoid' Macleod says (the number one UK blogger, according to this study), it becomes clear that the research is flawed.

Gapingvoid is a much-loved blog that is at least five years old, during which time Hugh has amassed more than 9,000 links. Lots of people like his cartoons, which are great... 

Hugh on blogging ROI

Yet Hugh himself admits that he “doesn’t feel particularly influential these days. My focus has shifted away from the blogosphere a lot in the last year”. That's from the cartoonist's mouth, but doesn't at all tally with what Technorati/Edelman are saying.

Given that this study is based on low-hanging fruit, and perhaps bruised sploggy fruit at that, is it in any way accurate? Well if we’re into link counting then yes. But in terms of influence? It is a 'maybe' at best, if you work in online PR, and possibly a 'no' if you're a media planner.

Later today I'll publish some research we've done on UK blogs, which will unearth metrics such as unique users and page impressions.

Chris Lake

Published 13 October, 2006 by Chris Lake

Chris Lake is CEO at EmpiricalProof, and former Director of Content at Econsultancy. Follow him on Twitter, Google+ or connect via Linkedin.

582 more posts from this author

Comments (4)

Ian Delaney

Ian Delaney, Crimson Business

I believe Technorati rankings are only based on the last 180 days' links. So you can't get lazy and expect to keep your ranking (sadly).

Also, Hugh's cartoon widget for posting his stuff on your blog sidebar is a great way to generate qualifying links without the user even needing to look at or comment on the cartoon. That points to another anomaly in the rankings.

about 10 years ago

Chris Lake

Chris Lake, CEO at Empirical Proof

Wow, Hugh is doing really well on that basis... I guess this proves that we all need WIDGETS!


about 10 years ago


Heather Hopkins, Director at Hitwise

Another thing to consider is in which markets the blogs are influential. The Technorati rankings are language specific now (with Edelman), but the UK blogs that rank highest in many cases get lots of links from the US. This is not a bad thing, but it is important to consider when thinking about influence.

Also, whilst a high ranking can be very satisfying, most bloggers (myself included) are interested in engaging with a particular audience, rather than the masses.

One of the things that make blogs and blogging so satisfying and powerful as a medium is that you don't need a mass audience. A knitting blog could be hugely successful by connecting a community.

about 10 years ago


Robert Schettino, CMO at BuzzLogic

umm....influential on what exactly? It is unlikely anyone is influential on every topic. Many of us may be influential on a specific topic, at a specific moment in time.
Influence is contextual and dynamic -- nonspecific, generic lists of influencers makes little sense. So this study is puzzling.

about 10 years ago

Save or Cancel

Enjoying this article?

Get more just like this, delivered to your inbox.

Keep up to date with the latest analysis, inspiration and learning from the Econsultancy blog with our free Daily Pulse newsletter. Each weekday, you ll receive a hand-picked digest of the latest and greatest articles, as well as snippets of new market data, best practice guides and trends research.