At some point, when you start a new business you come face to face with an interesting question: what the heck are we doing?

Chances are you had some idea of what you were doing before you started on your journey. You saw a problem. You thought you had a brilliant solution. You know the story.

But once you're off the ground, your new company's identity becomes a more formal affair. The details start to matter and you have to place your business in the context of the real world that it's competing in.

FriendFeed was conceived of as "a service that makes it easy to share with friends online". It hasn't taken the world by storm but it's a relatively popular service that, according to, pulls in just under a million US uniques per month. Whether FriendFeed ever achieves massive success and tons of revenue isn't clear but, in my limited trials of it, I found that it appeared to do just what it says it does: help people share interesting online content amongst friends.

Yesterday, FriendFeed launched a massive redesign that literally changed the face of the service. If you think that its new 'real-time' focus looks a little bit like Twitter, you're not alone. I thought the same thing when I read the announcement and saw it.

I'm not a psychic and I'm not an active member of the FriendFeed community so I don't know if FriendFeed's redesign will turn out to be an overwhelming success or a complete flop. But the redesign did remind me of all the businesses that try to be something they're not. I couldn't help but think that FriendFeed was possibly making a huge mistake by taking a page out of Twitter's book since I always saw the services as being far more unique than similar; one (Twitter) was just more popular than the other. Probably to FriendFeed's consternation given the past comparisons/competition.

In my opinion, businesses shouldn't pretend to be something they're not and they can't try to change their identities to simply be more fashionable. While some might argue that FriendFeed is merely adapting to the market (something all businesses have to do at some point), I disagree.

There's nothing inherently wrong with doing well what you set out to do. Even if it turns out that the market for what you do is smaller than the market for another company that some have compared to yours, that doesn't mean that you should chase somebody else's pot of gold.

In the case of FriendFeed and Twitter, who knows what the future holds. As much as I love Twitter (when it's not fail whaling), I still wouldn't bet any money on its staying power or ability to monetize. If I was in charge of FriendFeed, I'd think long and hard before trying to follow too closely in Twitter's footprints.

Photo credit: Zitona « [09] via Flickr.

Patricio Robles

Published 1 May, 2009 by Patricio Robles

Patricio Robles is a tech reporter at Econsultancy. Follow him on Twitter.

2641 more posts from this author

You might be interested in

Comments (4)



On the plus side it makes my tweets look good. Unravelling shortened URLs (but keeping the link in tact for statistics), embedding YouTube Videos and making #hashtags clickable.

about 9 years ago

James Wakeman

James Wakeman, Unsure

Think the same can be said of some of Facebook's recent feature additions: real-time & mobile status updates. I too have no problem with copying good ideas, but you should at least try to introduce a new twist on the original concept; otherwise it just smacks of 'ooh, wish we'd thought of that'.

about 9 years ago

david carralon

david carralon, Head of SEO EMEA & APAC at Career Builder

about 9 years ago

david carralon

david carralon, Head of SEO EMEA & APAC at Career Builder

I agree that facebook is playing copycat lately with the 'what are you doing now' thingy, but other ones are doing it too to lesser extent eg: linked in. I feel this post is also applicable to real life small and medium businesses that are initially set to sell only a small set products and services eg: 'web design and development' and end up selling all sorts of things (seo, branding, offline print design, hosting, etc), despite some of those solutions being sloppy.

I agree it is best to do less but good and keep your target market happy and satisfied.

about 9 years ago

Save or Cancel

Enjoying this article?

Get more just like this, delivered to your inbox.

Keep up to date with the latest analysis, inspiration and learning from the Econsultancy blog with our free Digital Pulse newsletter. You will receive a hand-picked digest of the latest and greatest articles, as well as snippets of new market data, best practice guides and trends research.